Skip to main content
Log in

Phonemic awareness development in 2.5- and 3.5-year-old children: an examination of emergent, receptive, knowledge and skills

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health has deemed illiteracy a national health crisis based on reading proficiency rates among American children. In 2002, the National Early Literacy Panel identified six pre-reading skills that are most crucial precursors to reading mastery and predict future reading outcomes. Of those skills, phonological awareness, and in particular phonemic awareness, is the strongest independent predictor of early reading outcomes. However, limited research has addressed the development of these component skills due in part to the fact that many of the measures used to assess sub-skills such as phonemic awareness are oral production measures that cannot easily be administered with children under the age of five, and are not designed to detect implicit or emerging knowledge. To address this limitation, we developed and administered two receptive measures of phonemic awareness to 2.5- and 3.5-year-old children. We found evidence for the emergence of this component skill earlier in ontogeny than is currently acknowledged in the literature. Overall, children performed at above chance rates on measures of receptive phonemic awareness at the level of the individual phoneme as early as 2.5-years-old. Results are discussed in terms of the need for a paradigm shift in prevailing models of how phonological awareness develops, as well as the potential to identify children at-risk for reading failure at an earlier point in ontogeny than is currently feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B. M., & Burgess, S. R. (2003). Phonological sensitivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 470–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1981). Visual memory and phonological skills in reading and spelling backwardness. Psychological Research, 43(2), 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A Causal connection. Nature, 30, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardillo, G. C. (2010). Predicting the predictors: Individual differences in longitudinal relationships between infant phonetic perception, toddler vocabulary, and preschooler language and phonological awareness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71(10) B. (UMI No: 3421541). Retrieved August 20, 2011 from Dissertation and Theses database.

  • Castles, A., Wilson, K., & Coltheart, M. (2011). Early orthographic influences on phonemic awareness tasks: Evidence from a preschool training study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., & Hogan, T. P. (2003). Language basis of reading disabilities and implications for early identification and remediation. Reading Psychology, 24(3–4), 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Children’s literacy environments and early word recognition skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories: User’s guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, I., Libenson, A., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2010). Sensitivity to linguistic stress, phonological awareness, and early reading ability in preschoolers. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005). Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the ‘critical period’. Language Learning and Development, 1(3–4), 273–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankwiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., Anthony, J. L., & Barker, T. A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metsala, J. L. (1999). The development of phonemic awareness in learning disabled children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(1), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, S. (1997). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35, 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress (2015). The Nation’s Report Card: 2015 Mathematics and reading assessments. (Report No. NCES 2015136). Retrieved February 5, 2016 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015136.

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS. (2010). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (NA). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read (Report No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1989). Prediction of reading dysfunction from familial and individual differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, W. G. M., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van Leeuwe, J. F. J. (2009). The predictive power of phonemic awareness and naming speed for early Dutch word recognition. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackerle-Hollman, A. K., Schmitt, B. A., Bradfield, T. A., Rodriguez, M. C., & McConnell, S. R. (2015). Redefining individual growth and development indicators: Phonological awareness. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(5), 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgeson, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological awareness and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2002). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandi Biscoe Kenner.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Word lists: receptive phoneme blending and segmenting measures

Blending task stimuli

Training auditory stimuli

Training picture pair stimuli

 /g//ʌ//m/

 Gum, watch

 /p//ɒ//t/

 Pot, door

Test trial stimuli lists

Initial phoneme lists

Final phoneme lists

Target auditory stimulus

Picture pair stimuli

Target auditory stimulus

Picture pair stimuli

/s/ɒ/k/

Sock, lock

/k/aʊ/tʃ/

Couch, cows

/w/ɪə//l/

Seal, wheel

/k/eɪ/k/

Cake, cage

/k/æ/n/

Can, fan

/d/ɒ/l/

Dog, doll

/f/ɪ/ʃ/

Dish, fish

/b/ɪə/tʃ/

Beach, beak

/k/æ/t/

Cat, bat

/k/əʊ/m/

Comb, coat

/h/əʊ/z/

Hose, nose

/m/eɪ/l/

Man, mail

/w/ʌ/n

One, sun

/b/əʊ/l/ 

Bowl, boat

/g/uː/s/

Goose, juice

/b/ʌ/s/

Bus, bug

Segmenting task stimuli

Training auditory stimuli

Training picture stimuli

 /w//ɒ//tʃ/ ; /g//ʌ//m/

 Gum or watch

 /p/ /ɒ/ /t/ ; /d/ɔː/

 Pot or door

Test trial stimuli lists

Initial phoneme trials

Final phoneme trials

Target auditory stimuli

Picture stimulus

Target auditory stimuli

Picture stimulus

/h/əʊ/z/; /n/əʊ/z/

Hose or nose

/k/əʊ/m/; /k/əʊ/t/

Comb or coat

/w/ʌ//n/; /s/ʌ/n/

One or sun

/b/ʌ/g/; /b/ʌ/s/

Bus or bug

/k/æ/t/; /b//æ//t/

Cat or bat

/b/əʊ/t/; b/əʊ/l

Boat or bowl

/g/uː/s/; /ʤ/uː/s/

Goose or juice

/m/eɪ/l/; /m/eə/n/

Mail or man

/k/æ/n/; /f/æ/n/

Can or fan

/d/ɒ/g/; /d/ɒ/l/

Dog or doll

/f/ɪ/ʃ/; /d/ɪ/ʃ/

Fish or dish

/k/aʊ/tʃ/; /k/aʊ/z/

Couch or cows

/l/ɒ/k/; /s/ɒ/k/

Lock or sock

/b/ɪə/tʃ/; /b/ɪə/k/

Beach or beak

/w/ɪə/l/; /s/ɪə/l/

Wheel or seal

/k/eɪ/k/; /k/eɪ/ʤ/

Cake or cage

Appendix 2

See Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Peabody picture vocabulary test-4th edition (PPVT-4) sample page

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kenner, B.B., Terry, N.P., Friehling, A.H. et al. Phonemic awareness development in 2.5- and 3.5-year-old children: an examination of emergent, receptive, knowledge and skills. Read Writ 30, 1575–1594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9738-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9738-0

Keywords

Navigation