Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promoting the development of preschool children’s emergent literacy skills: a randomized evaluation of a literacy-focused curriculum and two professional development models

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, there have been few causally interpretable evaluations of the impacts of preschool curricula on the skills of children at-risk for academic difficulties, and even fewer studies have demonstrated statistically significant or educationally meaningful effects. In this cluster-randomized study, we evaluated the impacts of a literacy-focused preschool curriculum and two types of professional development on the emergent literacy skills of preschool children at-risk for educational difficulties. Forty-eight preschools were randomly assigned to a business-as-usual control, a literacy-focused curriculum with workshop-only professional development, or a literacy-focused curriculum with workshop plus in-class mentoring professional development conditions. An ethnically diverse group of 739 preschool children was assessed on language and literacy outcomes. Results revealed significant and moderate effects for the curriculum and small, mostly nonsignificant, effects of professional development across child outcomes and classroom measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the Perry Preschool Project (e.g., Schweinhart, Barnes, & Weikart, 1993) is often cited as evidence for the efficacy of the High/Scope Curriculum, the design of that study limits internally valid conclusions about differences between children exposed to the High/Scope Curriculum and children who had no preschool. Although often described as a randomized study, post-randomization manipulation of the sample reintroduced potential selection biases into the results. Moreover, because children in the control group received no preschool experience and because children in the High/Scope group also received weekly home visits as a part of the experimental conditions, any observed differences between children in the High/Scope condition and children in the control condition cannot be unambiguously attributed to the curriculum even if internally valid conclusions were possible.

  2. English-language assessments were used in this study to provide a common outcome metric by which to measure the impacts of the intervention. Because almost all instructional activities were conducted in English, regardless of children’s language background, these measures also provide the most direct measure of child outcomes. Moreover, in California and elsewhere, educational outcomes of interest are English-language outcomes.

  3. Although the curriculum did not target phonological short-term memory or lexical access, and we, therefore, did not anticipate any measured impacts on these measures, we included all of the subtests of the P-CTOPPP to provide descriptive information on the full spectrum of phonological processing skills.

  4. Despite the large number of children who were Spanish-speaking English language learners in the Los Angeles sites, most of the preschool personnel were monolingual English speakers, and virtually all of the instructional activities in the preschool centers were conducted in English.

  5. Use of multi-level modeling analysis is required because children within the same preschool site are likely to be similar to each other in measured outcomes, particularly by the end of a school year after being exposed to the same teacher, classroom activities, and classroom context. This can create a “clustering” effect in which variability between children within a preschool site is reduced (generally indexed by the intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]), resulting in a reduction in the size of the error term in an analysis, which inflates the significance level of an inferential test of the differences between means. Multi-level analyses adjust the inferential tests by accounting for the “cluster variable” in the model (in the reported analyses for this study, by treating preschool site as a random factor in the model). Analyses using classrooms as a random factor, either alone or with preschool center, did not alter the results. Children were not “clustered” within small-groups because small-group membership in LEPC classrooms was not assigned and is intended to vary across the school year as children’s skills change.

  6. Any pre-existing group differences are controlled in the analyses through the use of the nonverbal cognitive ability covariate, which was unlikely to be affected by exposure to the curriculum.

  7. Additional analyses were conducted to examine what, if any, influences the curriculum in use before the study had on outcomes. As with the site variable, there were no statistically significant experimental group by original curriculum interactions. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences for scores of children in control classrooms using High/Scope versus Creative Curriculum.

References

  • Abrams & Company. (2000). Let’s Begin with the Letter People. Waterbury, CT: Abrams & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B. M., & Burgess, S. R. (2003). Preschool phonological sensitivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 470–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. S., Lonigan, C. J., Whitehurst, G. J., & Epstein, J. N. (1994). Accelerating language development through picture-book reading: Replication and extension to a videotape training format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assel, M. A., Landry, S. H., Swank, P. R., & Gunnewig, S. (2006). An evaluation of curriculum, setting, and mentoring on the performance of children enrolled in pre-kindergarten. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 463–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S., Jung, K., Yarosz, D. J., Thomas, J., Hornbeck, A., Stechuk, R., et al. (2008). Educational effects of the Tools of the Mind curriculum: A randomized trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the Mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A. (1995). Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L., & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M. R., Roberts, J. E., Riggins, R., Zeisel, S. A., Neebe, E., & Bryant, D. (2000). Relating quality of child care to early cognitive and language development longitudinally. Child Development, 71, 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. R., Marsh, H. W., Sheppard, M. J., & Sheppard, J. L. (1985). Seven-year longitudinal study of the early prediction of reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. F. (1991a). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 805–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. F. (1991b). Sound Foundations. Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia: Leyden Educational Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. F. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A one year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1995). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 488–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, D. L., Armstrong, K., Cohen, R., & Todd, M. (2006). Indirect impact: How early childhood educator training and coaching impacted the acquisiton of literacy skills in preschool students. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 27, 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K., & Brady, J. P. (2006). Toward effective support for language and literacy through professional development. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 141–170). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K., & Caswell, L. (2007). Building support for language and early literacy in preschool classrooms through in-service professional development: Effects of the Literacy Environment Enrichment Program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, D. T., Colker, L. J., & Heroman, C. (2002). The Creative Curriculum for Preschool (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (2001). Much too soon. Education Next, 1(2), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, J. E., Bracken, S. S., Fuchs-Eisenberg, A., Spira, E. G., Katz, S., & Shaller, G. (2007). Evaluation of curricular approaches to enhance preschool early literacy skills. Journal of Literacy Research, 39, 471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. E., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disabilities: A longitudinal, individual growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, P. H., Kaplan, R. G., Cannon, J., Cordero, M. I., Eisenband, J. G., Galanter, M., et al. (2006). Helping early childhood educators to teach mathematics. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 171–202). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E., Lefebvre, P., & Greenberg, J. (2007). The effects of in-service education to promote emergent literacy in child care centers: A feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. H., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, M., & Weikart, D. P. (2002). Educating young children (2nd ed.). Ypsilanti, MI: High Scope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B., Larzelere, R., St. Clair, L., Corr, M., Fichter, C., & Egertson, H. (2006). The impact of HeadsUp! Reading on early childhood educators’ literacy practices and preschool children’s literacy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., McCoy, A., Pistorino, C., Wilkinson, A., Burghardtm, J., Clark, M., et al. (2007). National evaluation of Early Reading First: Final report to Congress. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. (2004). The impact of after-school programs: Interpreting the results of four recent evaluations. Working paper, W. T. Grant Foundation, NY.

  • Landry, S. H., & Fischel, J. E. (2008). Impact of language enhancement interventions on young children’s early literacy skills. In Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 211–231). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

  • Landry, S. H., Swank, P. R., Smith, K. E., Assel, M. A., & Gunnewig, S. B. (2006). Enhancing early literacy skills for preschool children: Bringing a professional development model to scale. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 306–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S., Fuller, B., Kagan, S. L., & Carrol, B. (2004). Child care in poor communities: Early learning effects of type, quality, and stability. Child Development, 75, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J. (2003). Development and promotion of emergent literacy skills in preschool children at-risk of reading difficulties. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 23–50). Timonium, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J. (2004). Evaluation of Components of a Pre-Literacy Intervention with Children At-Risk. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.

  • Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., & Anthony, J. L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36, 596–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., Anthony, J. L., & Barker, T. A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in two- to five-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J., Clancy-Menchetti, J., Phillips, B. M., McDowell, K., & Farver, J. M. (2005). Literacy Express: A preschool curriculum. Tallahassee, FL: Literacy Express.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J., & Phillips, B. M. (2007). Research-based instructional strategies for promoting children’s early literacy skills. In Encyclopedia of language and literacy development. Retrieved from Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network Web site: http://www.literacyencyclopedia.ca/index.php?fa=items.show&topicId=224.

  • Lonigan, C. J., Schatschneider, C., & Westberg, L. (2008a). Identification of children’s skills and abilities linked to later outcomes in reading, writing, and spelling. In Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 55–106). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

  • Lonigan, C. J., Schatschneider, C., & Westberg, L. (2008b). Impact of code-focused interventions on young children’s early literacy skills. In Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 107–151). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

  • Lonigan, C. J., Shanahan, T., & Cunningham, A. (2008c). Impact of shared-reading interventions on young children’s early literacy skills. In Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 153–171). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

  • Lonigan, C. J., Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. (2005b). Preschool Comprehensive Test of Phonological and Print Processing. Tallahassee, FL: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J., Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. (2007). Test of Preschool Early Literacy. Austin, TX: ProEd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J., & Whitehurst, G. J. (1998). Relative efficacy of parent and teacher involvement in a shared-reading intervention for preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcon, R. A. (1993). Socioemotional versus academic emphasis: Impact on kindergartners’ development and achievement. Early Child Development and Care. Special Issue: Enhancing young children’s lives, 96, 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcon, R. A. (1999). Differential impact of preschool models on development and early learning of inner-city children: A 3-cohort study. Developmental Psychology, 35, 358–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, K. L., Field, C. C., & Clifford, R. M. (2006). Defining and measuring professional development in early childhood research. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 21–48). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center on Educational Statistics. (2007). The Nation’s report card: Reading 2007. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2007/2007496.pdf.

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • National Institute of Child Health, Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2000). The relation of child care to cognitive and language development. Child Development, 71, 960–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health, Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2003). Does quality of child care affect child outcomes at age 4–1/2? Developmental Psychology, 39, 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (1999). The long-term effects of small classes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee Class Size Experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. E. (1999). Teachers learning Ladders to Literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., et al. (2001). The relation of preschool child-care quality to children’s cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72, 1534–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. M., Clancy-Menchetti, J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2008). Successful phonological awareness instruction with preschool children: Lessons from the classroom. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C. (2006). Standardized observation and professional development: A focus on individualized implementation and practices. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 231–254). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piasta, S. B., Purpura, D. J., & Wagner, R. (2009). Developing emergent literacy skills: The impact of alphabet instruction. Reading & Writing (in press).

  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, S. L., & Ramey, C. T. (2006). Creating and sustaining a high-quality workforce in child care, early intervention, and school readiness programs. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 351–368). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, I. S., & Bryant, P. (1990). Social background, phonological awareness, and children’s reading. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D., Hresko, W., & Hammill, D. (2001). Test of Early Reading Ability (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 27. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. W., & Dickinson, D. K. (2002). Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation (ELLCO) Toolkit, Research Edition. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, K. (2006). Completing the model: Connecting early child care worker professional development with child outcomes. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 137–140). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D., & Byler, P. (2004). The Early Childhood Classroom Observation Measure. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 375–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D., Feiler, R., Daniels, D., & Milburn, S. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children’s achievement and motivation. Child Development, 66, 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Boston: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333–355). Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health, Human Services, Administration for Children, Families. (2005). Head Start Impact Study: First year findings. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1998). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, Texas: ProEd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Hecht, S. A. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterford Institute Inc. (2001). Waterford Early Reading Program (R) Level I. New York: Pearson School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J. (1996). Language processes in context: Language learning in children reared in poverty. In L. B. Adamson & M. A. Romski (Eds.), Research on communication and language disorders: Contribution to theories of language development. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J. (2001). Much too late. Education Next, 1(2), 9, 16-19.

  • Whitehurst, G. J., Arnold, D. H., Epstein, J. N., Angell, A. L., Smith, M., & Fischel, J. E. (1994). A picture book reading intervention in daycare and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 30, 679–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., et al. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24, 552–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, V. C., Cook, T. D., Barnett, W. S., & Jung, K. (2008). An effectiveness-based evaluation of five state pre-kindergarten programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 122–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright Group, & McGraw Hill. (2001). Doors to Discovery: A new pre-kindergarten program. Bothell, WA: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V., & Pond, R. (2002). Preschool Language Scale (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by an Interagency Education Research Initiative grant (REC-0128970) to JoAnn M. Farver and Christopher J. Lonigan through the National Science Foundation. The views expressed herein have neither been reviewed nor endorsed by the granting agency. We wish to acknowledge the significant contributions to this project by Stephanie Eppe, Kimberly McDowell, and Patricia Byler, and we thank the teachers, schools, children, and research assistants involved in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Lonigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lonigan, C.J., Farver, J.M., Phillips, B.M. et al. Promoting the development of preschool children’s emergent literacy skills: a randomized evaluation of a literacy-focused curriculum and two professional development models. Read Writ 24, 305–337 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9214-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9214-6

Keywords

Navigation