Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 2/2020

18-10-2019

Test–retest reliability of ICECAP-A in the adult Danish population

Auteurs: Annette Willemoes Holst-Kristensen, Kirsten Fonager, Kjeld Møller Pedersen

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the test–retest reliability of Investigating Choice Experiments Capability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) in the adult Danish population.

Methods

The original English ICECAP-A was translated into Danish by forward–backwards translation using the guidelines by Beaton et al. Three hundred and-thirty-two participants with mean age of 57 years participated in a Web-based study. Data concerning relative and absolute agreement were analysed by the intra-class correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman plot with limits of agreement. The overall and item consistency was investigated by weighted kappa statistics from baseline to 2-week follow-up. Logistic regression was used to study the effect of the sociodemographic characteristics with inconsistent responses as the dependent binary variable. The independent variables were age, sex, education, income, and region of residence at baseline.

Results

The baseline ICECAP-A preference-based index score was 0.84, and at follow-up, 0.83. The ICC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.826–0.884), and limits of agreement were 0.164 and − 0.151. The kappa coefficient ranges from 45 to 65%, between random and perfect agreement. The logistic regression to analyse inconsistent responses showed no significant association between the overall index score and sociodemographic characteristics, and no clear pattern was found concerning the individual item inconsistency.

Conclusions

Evidence regarding the reliability of the Danish version of ICECAP-A is satisfactory for both the index score agreement and the individual item consistency and is a reliable measure to be used in a Danish context and future health economic evaluations.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
The corresponding author obtained permission to translate and use ICECAP-A into the Danish version by the ICECAP team, University of Birmingham.
 
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., & Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: The ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research,21(1), 167–176.CrossRef Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., & Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: The ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research,21(1), 167–176.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
go back to reference Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice (1st ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice (1st ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Smith, R., Lorgelly, P., Al-Janabi, H., Venkatapuram, S., & Coast, J. (2012). The capability approach: An alternative evaluation paradigm for health economics? In A. M. Jones (Ed.), The Elgar companion to health economics (2nd ed., pp. 415–424). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Smith, R., Lorgelly, P., Al-Janabi, H., Venkatapuram, S., & Coast, J. (2012). The capability approach: An alternative evaluation paradigm for health economics? In A. M. Jones (Ed.), The Elgar companion to health economics (2nd ed., pp. 415–424). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
5.
go back to reference Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
go back to reference Culyer, A. J. (1989). The Normative economics finance and of health provision. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,5(1), 34–58.CrossRef Culyer, A. J. (1989). The Normative economics finance and of health provision. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,5(1), 34–58.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
go back to reference Weinstein, M. C., Torrance, G., & Mcguire, A. (2009). QALYs: The basics. Value In Health,12(1), S5–S9.CrossRef Weinstein, M. C., Torrance, G., & Mcguire, A. (2009). QALYs: The basics. Value In Health,12(1), S5–S9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Makai, P., Brouwer, W. B. F., Koopmanschap, M. A., Stolk, E. A., & Nieboer, A. P. (2014). Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: A systematic review. Social Science and Medicine,102, 83–93.CrossRef Makai, P., Brouwer, W. B. F., Koopmanschap, M. A., Stolk, E. A., & Nieboer, A. P. (2014). Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: A systematic review. Social Science and Medicine,102, 83–93.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cookson, R. (2005). QALYs and the capability approach. Health Economics,14(8), 817–829.CrossRef Cookson, R. (2005). QALYs and the capability approach. Health Economics,14(8), 817–829.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford India. Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford India.
14.
go back to reference Al-Janabi, H., Peters, T. J., Brazier, J., Bryan, S., Flynn, T. N., Clemens, S., et al. (2013). An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure. Quality of Life Research,22(7), 1831–1840.CrossRef Al-Janabi, H., Peters, T. J., Brazier, J., Bryan, S., Flynn, T. N., Clemens, S., et al. (2013). An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure. Quality of Life Research,22(7), 1831–1840.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mitchell, P. M., Venkatapuram, S., Richardson, J., Iezzi, A., & Coast, J. (2017). Are quality-adjusted life years a good proxy measure of individual capabilities? Pharmaco Economics,35(6), 637–646.CrossRef Mitchell, P. M., Venkatapuram, S., Richardson, J., Iezzi, A., & Coast, J. (2017). Are quality-adjusted life years a good proxy measure of individual capabilities? Pharmaco Economics,35(6), 637–646.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Louviere, J. J., Flynn, T. N., & Marley, A. A. (2015). Best-worst scaling, theory method and applications (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Louviere, J. J., Flynn, T. N., & Marley, A. A. (2015). Best-worst scaling, theory method and applications (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Flynn, T. N., Huynh, E., Peters, T. J., Al-Janabi, H., Clemens, S., Moody, A., et al. (2013). Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK genrel population tariff. Health Economics,24(3), 258–269.CrossRef Flynn, T. N., Huynh, E., Peters, T. J., Al-Janabi, H., Clemens, S., Moody, A., et al. (2013). Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK genrel population tariff. Health Economics,24(3), 258–269.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine,25(24), 3186–3191.CrossRef Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine,25(24), 3186–3191.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales, a practical guide to their development and use (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales, a practical guide to their development and use (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
go back to reference Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine,15(2), 155–163.CrossRef Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine,15(2), 155–163.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research,8(99), 135–160.CrossRef Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research,8(99), 135–160.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brenner, H., & Kliebsch, U. (1996). Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology,7(2), 199–202.CrossRef Brenner, H., & Kliebsch, U. (1996). Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology,7(2), 199–202.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics,33(1), 159–174.CrossRef Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics,33(1), 159–174.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., Peters, T. J., Bryan, S., & Coast, J. (2015). Test-retest reliability of capability measurement in the UK general population. Health Economics,24(5), 625–630.CrossRef Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., Peters, T. J., Bryan, S., & Coast, J. (2015). Test-retest reliability of capability measurement in the UK general population. Health Economics,24(5), 625–630.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Engel, L., Mortimer, D., Bryan, S., Lear, S. A., & Whitehurst, D. G. T. (2017). An Investigation of the overlap between the ICECAP-A and five preference-based health-related quality of life instruments. Pharmaco Economics,35(7), 741–753.CrossRef Engel, L., Mortimer, D., Bryan, S., Lear, S. A., & Whitehurst, D. G. T. (2017). An Investigation of the overlap between the ICECAP-A and five preference-based health-related quality of life instruments. Pharmaco Economics,35(7), 741–753.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Edward Brazier, J., Rowen, D., Lloyd, A., & Karimi, M. (2019). Future directions in valuing benefits for estimating QALYs: Is time up for the EQ-5D? Value in Health,22, 62–68.CrossRef Edward Brazier, J., Rowen, D., Lloyd, A., & Karimi, M. (2019). Future directions in valuing benefits for estimating QALYs: Is time up for the EQ-5D? Value in Health,22, 62–68.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Karimi, M., Brazier, J., & Basarir, H. (2016). The capability approach: A critical review of its application in health economics. Value in Health,19(6), 795–799.CrossRef Karimi, M., Brazier, J., & Basarir, H. (2016). The capability approach: A critical review of its application in health economics. Value in Health,19(6), 795–799.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Test–retest reliability of ICECAP-A in the adult Danish population
Auteurs
Annette Willemoes Holst-Kristensen
Kirsten Fonager
Kjeld Møller Pedersen
Publicatiedatum
18-10-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02331-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2020

Quality of Life Research 2/2020 Naar de uitgave