Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2019

17-11-2018

Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide

Auteurs: Eric K. H. Chan, Todd C. Edwards, Kirstie Haywood, Sean P. Mikles, Louise Newton

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice is increasing. Following the creation of a ‘User’s Guide to Implementing PRO Assessment in Clinical Practice’ by the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), volunteers from ISOQOL sought to create a Companion Guide to assist health care providers with the scientific and practical considerations involved in implementing and using PRO measures in clinical care by using information from real-world case studies. This paper summarizes the key issues presented in the Companion Guide.

Methods

Ten respondents, who were members of the ISOQOL’s CP-SIG and worked in various clinical areas, participated in a survey or telephone interview. Participants were from Canada (n = 2), Denmark (n = 1), England (n = 2), Holland (n = 1), and the United States (n = 4).

Results

Based on the information provided by respondents, a Companion Guide was produced, organized according to the nine questions presented in the User’s Guide. An additional section for key take-home messages was also provided. This guide provides examples of issues and considerations related to the implementation of PRO measures in clinical practice.

Conclusions

Respondents provided insight into their experiences and emphasized that PRO initiatives were likely to be more successful if there is purposeful, designed integration into clinical practice, meaningful substantive engagement with all stakeholders and access to necessary organizational resources. The ability to leverage existing technology as well as realistic and stakeholder consensus-driven expectations for planning and timing were also key to the successful implementation of PRO measures.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Chen, J., Ou, L., & Hollis, S. J. (2013). A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Services Research, 13, 211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen, J., Ou, L., & Hollis, S. J. (2013). A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Services Research, 13, 211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724.CrossRefPubMed Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P., & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23(6), 508–518.CrossRefPubMed Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P., & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23(6), 508–518.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., Carrivick, S., Magnall, J., & Skevington, S. M. (2009). Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: A national survey of practitioners. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 423–433.CrossRefPubMed Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., Carrivick, S., Magnall, J., & Skevington, S. M. (2009). Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: A national survey of practitioners. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 423–433.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lohr, K. N., & Zebrack, B. J. (2009). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Challenges and opportunities. Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 99–107.CrossRefPubMed Lohr, K. N., & Zebrack, B. J. (2009). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Challenges and opportunities. Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 99–107.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Valderas, J. M., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., Guyatt, G., Ferrans, C. E., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2008). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17, 179–193.CrossRefPubMed Valderas, J. M., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., Guyatt, G., Ferrans, C. E., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2008). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17, 179–193.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. (2006). Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: Draft guidance. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(1), 79.CrossRef U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. (2006). Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: Draft guidance. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(1), 79.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. (2005). Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. London: European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. (2005). Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. London: European Medicines Agency.
11.
go back to reference World Health Organization WH. (2001). International classification of functioning. Disability: ICF. World Health Organization. World Health Organization WH. (2001). International classification of functioning. Disability: ICF. World Health Organization.
12.
go back to reference Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Jama, 273(1), 59–65.CrossRefPubMed Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Jama, 273(1), 59–65.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The triple aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759–769.CrossRefPubMed Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The triple aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759–769.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide
Auteurs
Eric K. H. Chan
Todd C. Edwards
Kirstie Haywood
Sean P. Mikles
Louise Newton
Publicatiedatum
17-11-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2048-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2019

Quality of Life Research 3/2019 Naar de uitgave