Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

12-06-2018

Can the e-OAKHQOL be an alternative to measure health-related quality of life in knee osteoarthritis?

Auteurs: Maud Wieczorek, Christine Rotonda, Jonathan Epstein, Francis Guillemin, Anne-Christine Rat

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2018

Abstract

Objective

To assess the validity of the e-OAKHQOL questionnaire and analyze whether the answers were affected by the form of administration (electronic vs. paper).

Methods

Two samples of patients with knee osteoarthritis were constituted. The first was recruited by general practitioners. Patients could choose to respond to the electronic or paper version. The second included subjects who responded to the paper version and were matched with respondents to the electronic version in the first sample. The OAKHQOL questionnaire measures health-related quality of life in five dimensions (43 items): physical activity, mental health, pain, social functioning, and social support. Validity was assessed by the classical test theory (CTT) and a Rasch measurement model (partial credit model).

Results

The electronic form was preferred by 471 (89.7%) patients: 345 were matched to respondents of the paper version. The percentage of missing responses was lower with the electronic than paper form (1.6 vs. 2.0%, p = .01). Rasch analysis revealed four items with underfitting. Internal consistency was excellent for physical activity (PSI = 0.96) and mental health (PSI = 0.93) but was slightly < 0.85 for the other dimensions. The top–down purification highlighted the significance of DIF by gender in the pain dimension and by form of questionnaire in the mental health dimension.

Conclusion

CTT and Rasch analysis demonstrated acceptable measurement properties for the five dimensions of the e-OAKHQOL, so it may be a valuable alternative to the paper form for measuring HRQoL.

vorige artikel Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluations of the Turkish version of Parkinson Fatigue Scale

volgende artikel The preliminary measurement properties of the person-centred community care inventory (PERCCI)

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Cross, M., Smith, E., Hoy, D., Nolte, S., Ackerman, I., Fransen, M., et al. (2014). The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: Estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 73(7), 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763.CrossRefPubMed

Guillemin, F., Rat, A. C., Mazieres, B., Pouchot, J., Fautrel, B., Euller-Ziegler, L., et al. (2011). Prevalence of symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: A two-phase population-based survey1. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 19(11), 1314–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.004.CrossRefPubMed

Rat, A.-C., Baumann, C., Guillemin, F., & Pouchot, J. (2010). Qualité de vie en rhumatologie. EMC—Appareil locomoteur, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0246-0521(10)46822-9.CrossRef

Rat, A.-C., Coste, J., Pouchot, J., Baumann, M., Spitz, E., Retel-Rude, N., et al. (2005). OAKHQOL: A new instrument to measure quality of life in knee and hip osteoarthritis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.011.CrossRefPubMed

Rat, A.-C., Pouchot, J., Coste, J., Baumann, C., Spitz, E., Retel-Rude, N., et al. (2006). Development and testing of a specific quality-of-life questionnaire for knee and hip osteoarthritis: OAKHQOL (OsteoArthritis of Knee Hip Quality Of Life). Joint Bone Spine, 73(6), 697–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.01.027.CrossRefPubMed

Goetz, C., Ecosse, E., Rat, A.-C., Pouchot, J., Coste, J., & Guillemin, F. (2011). Measurement properties of the osteoarthritis of knee and hip quality of life OAKHQOL questionnaire: An item response theory analysis. Rheumatology, 50(3), 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq357.CrossRefPubMed

Guillemin, F., Rat, A.-C., Goetz, C., Spitz, E., Pouchot, J., & Coste, J. (2016). The Mini-OAKHQOL for knee and hip osteoarthritis quality of life was obtained following recent shortening guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.010.CrossRefPubMed

Greenwood, M. C., Hakim, A. J., Carson, E., & Doyle, D. V. (2006). Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology, 45(1), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei100.CrossRefPubMed

Salaffi, F., Gasparini, S., & Grassi, W. (2009). The use of computer touch-screen technology for the collection of patient-reported outcome data in rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison with standardized paper questionnaires. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 27(3), 459–468.PubMed

10.

Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. Value in Health, 11(2), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., Lundy, J. J., Sloan, J. A., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2009). Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report. Value in Health, 12(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Spangenberg, L., Glaesmer, H., Boecker, M., & Forkmann, T. (2015). Differences in Patient Health Questionnaire and Aachen Depression Item Bank scores between tablet versus paper-and-pencil administration. Quality of Life Research, 24(12), 3023–3032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1040-5.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Viswanathan, M. (2005). Measurement error and research design. SAGE.

14.

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. SAGE.

15.

Guillemin, F., Rat, A.-C., Roux, C. H., Fautrel, B., Mazieres, B., Chevalier, X., et al. (2012). The KHOALA cohort of knee and hip osteoarthritis in France. Joint Bone Spine, 79(6), 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.03.011.CrossRefPubMed

16.

McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4(4), 293–307.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Karin Schermelleh-Engel, H. M. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(8), 23–74.

18.

Petrillo, J., Cano, S. J., McLeod, L. D., & Coon, C. D. (2015). Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: A comparison of worked examples. Value in Health, 18(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.005.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Fang, W.-H., Huang, G.-S., Chang, H.-F., Chen, C.-Y., Kang, C.-Y., Wang, C.-C., et al. (2015). Gender differences between WOMAC index scores, health-related quality of life and physical performance in an elderly Taiwanese population with knee osteoarthritis. British Medical Journal Open, 5(9), e008542. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008542.CrossRef

20.

Gautier, A., Kubiak, C., & Collin, J.-F. (2005). Qualité de vie: une évaluation positive. Baromètre santé, 2005, 45–64.

21.

Kovac, S. H., Mikuls, T. R., Mudano, A., & Saag, K. G. (2006). Health-related quality of life among self-reported arthritis sufferers: Effects of race/ethnicity and residence. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 15(3), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-3213-0.CrossRef

22.

Kawano, M. M., Araújo, I. L. A., Castro, M. C., & Matos, M. A. (2015). Assessment of quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira, 23(6), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220152306150596.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Bindawas, S. M., Vennu, V., & Al Snih, S. (2015). Differences in health-related quality of life among subjects with frequent bilateral or unilateral knee pain: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative Study. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 45(2), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Perrot, S., & Bertin, P. (2013). “Feeling better” or “feeling well” in usual care of hip and knee osteoarthritis pain: Determination of cutoff points for patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) at rest and on movement in a national multicenter cohort study of 2414 patients with painful osteoarthritis. Pain, 154(2), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.017.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis & Rheumatism, 57(8), 1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108.CrossRef

26.

Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (2013). Rasch models in health. Wiley.

27.

Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions. 16(2), 878

28.

Tennant, A., & Pallant, J. F. (2007). DIF matters: A practical approach to test if differential item functioning makes a difference. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20, 1082–1084.

29.

Tennant, A. (2017). A matter of convergence: Classical and modern approaches to scale development. Perceived Health and Adaptation in Chronic Disease 1, 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155074-11 CrossRef

30.

Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q ₃: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616677520.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2009). The COSMIN checklist manual. Amsterdam: VU University Medical Centre. Retrieved from http://www.cosmin.nl/images/upload/files/COSMIN%20checklist%20manual%20v9.pdf.

33.

Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.PubMed

34.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L. J., Velikova, G., & Sharpe, M. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

He, Q., & Wheadon, C. (2012). The effect of sample size on item parameter estimation for the partial credit model. Retrieved from http://cerp.aqa.org.uk/sites/default/files/pdf_upload/CERP_RP_QH_11122008.pdf.

36.

Zwick, R. (2012). A review of ETS Differential Item Functioning Assessment procedures: Flagging rules, minimum sample size requirements and criterion refinement. ETS Research Report Series, 2012(1), i-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2012.tb02290.x.CrossRef

37.

Luckett, T., Butow, P. N., & King, M. T. (2009). Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions. Psycho-Oncology, 18(11), 1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1545.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Bennett, A. V., Jensen, R. E., & Basch, E. (2012). Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62(5), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21150.CrossRef

39.

Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., & Selby, P. J. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078.CrossRef

40.

Hilarius, D. L., Kloeg, P. H., Gundy, C. M., & Aaronson, N. K. (2008). Use of health-related quality-of-life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: A community hospital-based intervention study. Cancer, 113(3), 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23623.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Varricchio, C. G., & Ferrans, C. E. (2010). Quality of life assessments in clinical practice. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 26(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2009.11.003.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Aaronson, N. K., & Snyder, C. (2008). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Proceedings of an International Society of Quality of Life Research conference. Quality of Life Research, 17(10), 1295–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9422-6.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Barton, J. L., & Katz, P. (2016). The patient experience: Patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology. Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North America, 42(2), xv–xvi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2016.02.001.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Can the e-OAKHQOL be an alternative to measure health-related quality of life in knee osteoarthritis?
Auteurs: Maud Wieczorek
Christine Rotonda
Jonathan Epstein
Francis Guillemin
Anne-Christine Rat
Publicatiedatum: 12-06-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1914-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2018

A systematic review of the quality of reporting of simulation studies about methods for the analysis of complex longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data

Exploring the lived experience of migrants dying away from their country of origin

Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a reply to Ribi et al.

A population-based analysis of life satisfaction and social support among children of diverse backgrounds in British Columbia, Canada

Risky sexual behavior: the indirect effects between parent–child relationship quality and quality of life in emerging adults

Trials with patient-reported outcomes registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)