Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

21-02-2017

Differential item functioning of the patient-reported outcomes information system (PROMIS^®) pain interference item bank by language (Spanish versus English)

Auteurs: Sylvia H. Paz, Karen L. Spritzer, Steven P. Reise, Ron D. Hays

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2017

Abstract

Background

About 70% of Latinos, 5 years old or older, in the United States speak Spanish at home. Measurement equivalence of the PROMIS^® pain interference (PI) item bank by language of administration (English versus Spanish) has not been evaluated.

Methods

A sample of 527 adult Spanish-speaking Latinos completed the Spanish version of the 41-item PROMIS^® pain interference item bank. We evaluate dimensionality, monotonicity and local independence of the Spanish-language items. Then we evaluate differential item functioning (DIF) using ordinal logistic regression with item response theory scores estimated from DIF-free “anchor” items.

Results

One of the 41 items in the Spanish version of the PROMIS^® PI item bank was identified as having significant uniform DIF.

Conclusions

English- and Spanish-speaking subjects with the same level of pain interference responded differently to 1 of the 41 items in the PROMIS^® PI item bank. This item was not retained due to proprietary issues. The original English language item parameters can be used when estimating PROMIS^® PI scores.

vorige artikel Item bias detection in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using structural equation modeling: comparison with other item bias detection methods

volgende artikel Minimal impact of response shift for SF-12 mental and physical health status in homeless and vulnerably housed individuals: an item-level multi-group analysis

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Jensen, M. P., et al. (2010). Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain, 150(1), 173–182 (PubMed).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-04.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2016.

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/facts-for-features/2015/cb15-ff18.htm. Accessed 27 July 2016.

http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/pdf/cb13ff-19sp_hispanicheritage.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2016.

http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/05/12/english-proficiency-on-the-rise-among-latinos/. Accessed 27 July 2016.

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1179–1194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cella, D., Hernandez, L., Bonomi, A. E., Corona, M., Vaquero, M., Shiomoto, G., et al. (1998). Spanish language translation and initial validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy quality-of-life instrument. Medical Care, 36, 1407–1418.CrossRefPubMed

http://www.nihpromis.org/measures/translations. Accessed 27 July 2016.

https://us.toluna.com/. Accessed 27 July 2016.

10.

http://dgim.ucsf.edu/diversity/SASH_manual.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2016.

11.

Reeve, B.B., Hays, R.D., Bjorner, J.B., et al. (2007). PROMIS Cooperative Group. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–S31 (PubMed PMID: 17443115)

12.

Embretson, S., Reise, S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists (1st edn). Hove: Psychology Press

13.

MPlus: Muthen & Muthen. http://www.statmodel.com/.

14.

Morales, L. S., Flowers, C., Gutierrez, P., et al. (2006). Item and scale differential functioning of the mini-mental state exam assessed using the differential item and test functioning (DFIT) framework. Medical Care, 44, S143–S151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Samejima F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17.

16.

Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In van der Linden W. J. & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). New York: SpringerCrossRef

17.

Bjorner, J. B., Smith, K. J., Stone, C., & Sun, X. (2007). IRTFIT: A macro for item fit and local dependence tests under IRT models. Lincoln: Quality Metric Incorporated

18.

Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S-χ2: an item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289–298.CrossRef

19.

Teresi, J.A., Kleinman, M., Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2000). Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures. Statistics in Medicine, 15–30, 1651–1683 (PubMed PMID: 10844726).

20.

Liu, H., Cella, D. F., Gershon, R., Shen, J., Morales, L. S., Riley, W., et al. (2010). Representativeness of the PROMIS internet panel. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1169–1178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Gershon, R. C., Rothrock, N., Hanrahan, R., Bass, M., & Cella, D. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of applied measurement, 11(3), 304–314 (PubMed PMID: 20847477; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3686485) PubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). Lordif: an R Package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8), 1–30 (PubMed PMID: 21572908; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3093114) CrossRef

23.

https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lordif/lordif.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2016.

24.

Hays, R. D., Liu, H., & Kapteyn, A. (2015). Use of internet panels to conduct surveys. Behavior Research Methods, 47(3), 685–690.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Crins, M.H.P., Roorda, L.D., Smits, N., et.al. (2015). Calibration and validation of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pain interference item bank in patients with chronic pain. PLOS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134094.PubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Differential item functioning of the patient-reported outcomes information system (PROMIS®) pain interference item bank by language (Spanish versus English)
Auteurs: Sylvia H. Paz
Karen L. Spritzer
Steven P. Reise
Ron D. Hays
Publicatiedatum: 21-02-2017
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1499-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2017

Quality of life and uncertainty in Crohn’s disease

Health literacy and logical inconsistencies in valuations of hypothetical health states: results from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study

Patient versus general population health state valuations: a case study of non-specific low back pain

The PROMIS fatigue item bank has good measurement properties in patients with fibromyalgia and severe fatigue

Cost of informal care for patients with cardiovascular disease or diabetes: current evidence and research challenges

Quality of life improves in children and adolescents during a community-based overweight and obesity treatment