Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2017

22-12-2016

Improving measures of work-related physical functioning

Auteurs: Christine M. McDonough, Pengsheng Ni, Kara Peterik, Elizabeth E. Marfeo, Molly E. Marino, Mark Meterko, Elizabeth K. Rasch, Diane E. Brandt, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To expand content of the physical function domain of the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB), developed for the US Social Security Administration’s (SSA) disability determination process.

Methods

Newly developed questions were administered to 3532 recent SSA applicants for work disability benefits and 2025 US adults. Factor analyses and item response theory (IRT) methods were used to calibrate and link the new items to the existing WD-FAB, and computer-adaptive test simulations were conducted.

Results

Factor and IRT analyses supported integration of 44 new items into three existing WD-FAB scales and the addition of a new 11-item scale (Community Mobility). The final physical function domain consisting of: Basic Mobility (56 items), Upper Body Function (34 items), Fine Motor Function (45 items), and Community Mobility (11 items) demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties.

Conclusions

The WD-FAB offers an important tool for enhancement of work disability determination. The FAB could provide relevant information about work-related functioning for initial assessment of claimants; identifying denied applicants who may benefit from interventions to improve work and health outcomes; enhancing periodic review of work disability beneficiaries; and assessing outcomes for policies, programs and services targeting people with work disability.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2007). The future of disability in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2007). The future of disability in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
2.
go back to reference Institute on Disability. (2016). 2015 annual disability statistics compendium. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire. Institute on Disability. (2016). 2015 annual disability statistics compendium. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire.
3.
go back to reference Social Security Administration. (2014). Annual statistical report on the Social Security Disability Insurance program. Accessed April 21, 2016. Social Security Administration. (2014). Annual statistical report on the Social Security Disability Insurance program. Accessed April 21, 2016.
4.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2007). Improving the social security disability decision process. Washington. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2007). Improving the social security disability decision process. Washington.
5.
go back to reference Haley, S., Ni, P., Jette, A., et al. (2009). Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 461–471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haley, S., Ni, P., Jette, A., et al. (2009). Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 461–471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference McDonough, C. M., Jette, A. M., Ni, P., et al. (2013). Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: Item pool construction and factor analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(9), 1653–1660.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDonough, C. M., Jette, A. M., Ni, P., et al. (2013). Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: Item pool construction and factor analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(9), 1653–1660.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Ni, P. S., McDonough, C. M. J. A., Bogusz, K., Marfeo, E. E., Rasch, E. K., Brandt, D. E., et al. (2013). Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for Social Security Administration disability determination. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1661–1669.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ni, P. S., McDonough, C. M. J. A., Bogusz, K., Marfeo, E. E., Rasch, E. K., Brandt, D. E., et al. (2013). Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for Social Security Administration disability determination. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1661–1669.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Marino, M. E., Meterko, M., Marfeo, E. E., et al. (2015). Work-related measures of physical and behavioral health function: Test–retest reliability. Disability and Health Journal, 8(4), 652–657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marino, M. E., Meterko, M., Marfeo, E. E., et al. (2015). Work-related measures of physical and behavioral health function: Test–retest reliability. Disability and Health Journal, 8(4), 652–657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Meterko, M., Marfeo, E. E., McDonough, C. M., et al. (2015). Work disability functional assessment battery: Feasibility and psychometric properties. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(6), 1028–1035.CrossRefPubMed Meterko, M., Marfeo, E. E., McDonough, C. M., et al. (2015). Work disability functional assessment battery: Feasibility and psychometric properties. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(6), 1028–1035.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Marfeo, E. E. H. S., Jette, A. M., Eisen, S. E., et al. (2013). A conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for Social Security work disability evaluation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1645–1652.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marfeo, E. E. H. S., Jette, A. M., Eisen, S. E., et al. (2013). A conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for Social Security work disability evaluation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1645–1652.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva.
12.
go back to reference Rivers D. (2006). Sample matching: Representative sampling from internet panels. A white paper on the advantages of the sample matching methodology. Palo Alto, CA: Polimetrix, Inc. Rivers D. (2006). Sample matching: Representative sampling from internet panels. A white paper on the advantages of the sample matching methodology. Palo Alto, CA: Polimetrix, Inc.
13.
go back to reference Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
go back to reference Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.CrossRefPubMed Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17(Suppl), 1–100.CrossRef Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17(Suppl), 1–100.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289–298.CrossRef Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289–298.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thissen, D. (2009). The MEDPRO Project: An SBIR project for a comprehensive IRT and CAT software system-IRT software. Paper presented at GMAC conference on computerized adaptive testing, Minneapolis, MN. Thissen, D. (2009). The MEDPRO Project: An SBIR project for a comprehensive IRT and CAT software system-IRT software. Paper presented at GMAC conference on computerized adaptive testing, Minneapolis, MN.
20.
go back to reference Scientific Software International. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL. Scientific Software International. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL.
21.
go back to reference Langer, M. (2008). A reexamination of Lord’s Wald test for differential item functioning using item response theory and modern error estimation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. Langer, M. (2008). A reexamination of Lord’s Wald test for differential item functioning using item response theory and modern error estimation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
22.
go back to reference Woods, C., Cai, L., & Wang, M. (2013). The Langer-improved Wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: Evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 532–547.CrossRef Woods, C., Cai, L., & Wang, M. (2013). The Langer-improved Wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: Evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 532–547.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Edelen, M., Stucky, B., & Chandra, A. (2015). Quantifying ‘problematic’ DIF within an IRT framework: Application to a cancer stigma index. Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 95–103.CrossRefPubMed Edelen, M., Stucky, B., & Chandra, A. (2015). Quantifying ‘problematic’ DIF within an IRT framework: Application to a cancer stigma index. Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 95–103.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347–360.CrossRef Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347–360.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Improving measures of work-related physical functioning
Auteurs
Christine M. McDonough
Pengsheng Ni
Kara Peterik
Elizabeth E. Marfeo
Molly E. Marino
Mark Meterko
Elizabeth K. Rasch
Diane E. Brandt
Alan M. Jette
Leighton Chan
Publicatiedatum
22-12-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1477-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Quality of Life Research 3/2017 Naar de uitgave