Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 4/2017

20-10-2016

Patient-reported outcome measures in older people with hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability

Auteurs: K. L. Haywood, J. Brett, E. Tutton, S. Staniszewska

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Hip fracture is the most common serious injury of older people, often resulting in reduced mobility and loss of independence. However, guidance for the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) does not exist: we describe the first review to apply internationally endorsed criteria in support of PROM quality and acceptability in this group, and make recommendations for future applications.

Methods

Systematic literature searches of major databases (1980–2015) to identify published evidence of the application and quality of clearly defined measures. Evidence of measurement and practical properties, and the extent of active patient involvement, was sought. Study and PROM quality was assessed against recommended criteria.

Results

Seventy-one articles relating to 28 PROMs (Generic n = 12; Specific n = 16) were included. The SF-36 (v1) and EuroQoL EQ-5D 3L were the most widely evaluated measures with acceptable evidence of measurement properties, but limited evaluations of practical properties or relevance to this group. Evidence was mostly limited for the remaining measures. Hypothesized associations between variables were infrequently evaluated. Evidence of data quality, test–retest reliability, responsiveness, interpretation, acceptability and feasibility was also limited. Active patient involvement in PROM development or evaluation was not reported. There was limited evaluation of proxy completions.

Conclusions

The paucity of robust evaluations is disappointing and prevents clear recommendations for PROM-based assessment. Further research must urgently seek to identify which outcomes really matter to this group. Future PROM selection must be underpinned by research which focuses on methodological quality, including issues of acceptability, relevance, feasibility of application, and proxy completion, whilst seeking to actively incorporate the perspective of patients and their advocates.
volgende artikel Assessment of quality of life in advanced, metastatic prostate cancer: an overview of randomized phase III trials
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
2.
Johnell, O., & Kanis, J. A. (2004). An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporosis International, 15, 897–902.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Ahmad, M. A., Xypnitos, F. N., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2011). Measuring hip outcomes: Common scales and checklists. Injury, 42(3), 259–264.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hutchings, L., Fox, R., & Chesser, T. (2011). Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: How are we measuring outcome? Injury, 42(11), 1205–1213.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Ahmed, S., Berzon, R., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2012). The use of patient reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care, 50(12), 1060–1070.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Basch, E., Abernethy, A. P., Mullins, C. D., et al. (2012). Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(34), 4229–4255.CrossRef
8.
Basch, E. (2012). Beyond the FDA PRO guidance: Steps toward integrating meaningful patient reported outcomes into regulatory trials and US drug labels. Value in Health, 15, 401–403.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Barham, L., & Devlin, N. (2011). Patient reported outcome measures: Implications for nursing. Nursing Standard, 25(18), 42–45.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Bryant, D. M., Sanders, D. W., Coles, C. P., Petrisor, B. A., Jeray, K. J., & Laflamme, G. Y. (2009). Selection of outcome measures for patients with hip fracture. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 23(6), 434–441.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115–1123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Nilsdotter, A., & Bremander, A. (2011). Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris hip score (HHS), hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), Oxford hip score (OHS), Lequesne index of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) hip and knee questionnaire. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11), S200–S207.CrossRef
13.
Elbers, R. G., Reitberg, M. B., van Wegen, E. E., Verhoef, J., Kramer, S., Terwee, C. B., et al. (2012). Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: A systematic review of measurement properties. Quality of Life Research, 21(6), 925–944.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Straus, S., Glasziou, M., Richardson, W., & Haynes, R. (2010). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach it (4th ed.). Churchill Livinstone: Elsevier.
15.
Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Haywood, K. L., Staniszewska, S., & Chapman, S. (2012). Quality and acceptability of patient reported outcome measures in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis (CFS/ME): A structured review. Quality of Life Research, 21(2), 35–52.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2014). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (5th ed.). USA: Oxford University Press.
18.
19.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Haywood, K. L., Collins, S., & Crawley, E. (2014). Assessing severity of illness and outcomes of treatment in children with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis (CFS/ME): A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40(6), 806–824.
21.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Staniszewska, S., Haywood, K. L., Brett, J., & Tutton, L. (2012). Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: Evolution not revolution. Patient, 5(2), 79–87.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Mattsson, P., Alberts, A., Dahlberg, G., Sohlman, M., Hyldahl, H. C., & Larsson, S. (2005). Resorbable cement for the augmentation of internally-fixed unstable trochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomised multicentre study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 87(9), 1203–1209.CrossRef
24.
Conijn, A. P., Jens, S., Terwee, C. B., Breek, J. C., & Koelemay, M. J. W. (2015). Assessing the quality of available patient reported outcome measures for intermittent claudication: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 49(3), 316–334.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Nelson, E., Wasson, J., Kirk, J., Keller, A., Clark, D., Dietrich, A., et al. (1987). Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(Suppl 1), 55S–69S.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Backett, E. M., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1980). A quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 34(4), 281–286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Burkhardt, C., & Naderson, K. (2003). The quality of life scale: Reliability, validity and utilisation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 60.CrossRef
28.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales—a users’ manual. Boston: The Health Institute.
29.
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.CrossRefPubMed
30.
WHOQOL. Group. (1998). WHOQOL manual. Division of mental health and prevention of substance abuse.
31.
Group TE. (1990). EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 16(3), 199–208.CrossRef
32.
Torrence, G. W., Feeny, D. H., Furlong, W. J., Barr, R. D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Q. (1996). Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Medical Care, 34, 702–722.CrossRef
33.
Feeney, D., Furlong, W., Torrence, G. W., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2002). Multiattribute and single attribute utility functions for Health Utility Index Mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40, 113–128.CrossRef
34.
Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. R. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based index from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Coast, J., Flynn, T. N., Natarajan, L., et al. (2008). Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 874–882.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Charnley, J. (1972). Long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 54, 61–76.
37.
Harris, W. H. (1969). Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation in acetabular fractures treatment by mold arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 51, 737–755.CrossRef
38.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Carr, A., & Murray, D. (1996). Oxford hip score: Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 78, 185–190.CrossRef
39.
Silverman, S. L. (2000). The Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire (OPAQ): A reliable and valid disease-targeted measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in osteoporosis. Quality of Life Research, 9, 767–774.CrossRef
40.
Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Campbell, J., & Stitt, L. (1988). Validation study of the WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. The Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology, 1, 95–108.
41.
Brink, T. L., Yesavage, J. A., Lum, O., Heersema, P., Adey, M. B., & Rose, T. L. (1982). Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clinical Gerontologist, 1, 37–44.CrossRef
42.
43.
44.
Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.PubMed
45.
Baker, N. L., Cook, M. N., Arrighi, H. M., & Bullock, R. (2011). Hip fracture risk and subsequent mortality among Alzheimer’s disease patients in the United Kingdom, 1988–2007. Age and Ageing, 40(1), 49–54.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Pfeiffer, E., Johnson, T. M., & Chiofolo, R. C. (1981). Functional assessment of elderly subjects in four service settings. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 29, 433–437.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Macaulay, W., Nellans, K. W., Garvin, K. L., Iorio, R., Healy, W. L., Rosenwasser, M. P., et al. (2008). Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: Winner of the Dorr award. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 23(6), 2–8.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Jette, A. M., & Cleary, P. D. (1986). Functional disability assessment. Physical Therapy, 67, 1854–1859.CrossRef
49.
Lawton, M. P., Moss, M., Fulcomer, M., & Kleban, M. H. (1982). A research and service oriented multilevel assessment instrument. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 91–99.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Katz, J. N., Phillips, C. B., Poss, R., Harrast, J. J., Fossel, A. H., Liang, M. H., et al. (1995). The validity and reliability of a total hip arthroplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American, 77(10), 1528–1534.CrossRef
51.
Fillenbaum, G. G., & Smyer, M. A. (1981). The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. Journal of Gerontology, 36(4), 426–434.CrossRef
52.
Jones, C. A., & Feeney, D. H. (2005). Agreement between patient and proxy responses of health-related quality of life after hip fracture. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 53, 1227–1233.CrossRef
53.
Jones, C. A., & Feeny, D. H. (2006). Agreement between patient and proxy responses during recovery after hip fracture: Evidence for the FIM instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(10), 1382–1387.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Parsons, N., Griffin, X. L., Achten, J., & Costa, M. L. (2014). Outcome assessment after hip fracture: Is EQ-5D the answer? Bone & Joint Research, 3(3), 69–75.CrossRef
55.
Borgquist, L., Nilsson, L. T., Lindelöw, G., Wiklund, I., & Thorngren, K. G. (1992). Perceived health in hip-fracture patients: A prospective follow-up of 100 patients. Age and Aging, 21(2), 109–116.CrossRef
56.
Tidermark, J., Zethraeus, N., Svensson, O., Tornkvist, H., & Ponzer, S. (2002). Quality of life related to fracture displacement among elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 16, 34–38.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Tidermark, J., Bergstrom, G., Svensson, O., Tornkvist, H., & Ponzer, S. (2003). Responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and SF-36 in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Quality of Life Research, 12(8), 1069–1079.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Van Balen, R., Essink-Bot, M. L., Steyerberg, E., Cools, H., & Habbema, D. F. (2003). Quality of life after hip fracture: A comparison of four health status measures in 208 patients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(10), 507–519.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Inngul, C., Hedbeck, C.-J., Blomfeldt, R., Lapidus, G., Ponzer, S., & Enocson, A. (2013). Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: A four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. International Orthopaedics, 37(12), 2457–2464.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Cranney, A. B., Coyle, D., Hopman, W. M., Hum, V., Power, B., & Tugwell, P. S. (2005). Prospective evaluation of preferences and quality of life in women with hip fractures. The Journal of Rheumatology, 32(12), 2393–2399.PubMed
61.
Latham, N. K., Mehta, V., Nguyen, A. M., Jette, A. M., Olarsch, S., Papanicolaou, D., et al. (2008). Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: Which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(11), 2146–2155.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Jones, C. A., Pohar, S. L., Feeny, D. H., & Eng, K. (2014). Longitudinal construct validity of the Health Utilities Indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in hip fracture. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23(3), 805–813.CrossRef
63.
Mendelsohn, M. E., Leidl, D. S., Overend, T. J., & Petrella, R. J. (2003). Specificity of functional mobility measures in older adults after hip fracture: A pilot study. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(10), 766–774.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Tidermark, J., & Bergström, G. (2007). Responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Quality of Life Research, 16(2), 321–330.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Hobart, J. C., & Cano, S. J. (2010). Effect sizes can be misleading: Is it time to change the way we measure change? Quality of Life Research, 19, 41.
66.
Griffin, X. L., Parsons, N., Achten, J., Fernandez, M., & Costa, M. L. (2015). Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population: The Warwick hip trauma evaluation—a prospective cohort study. The Bone & Joint Journal, 97-B(3), 372–382. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​97B3.​35738.CrossRef
67.
Buecking, B., Struewer, J., Waldermann, A., Horstmann, K., Schubert, N., Balzer-Geldsetzer, M., et al. (2014). What determines health-related quality of life in hip fracture patients at the end of acute care?—a prospective observational study. Osteoporosis International, 25(2), 475–484. doi:10.​1007/​s00198-013-2415-5. Epub 2013 Jun 20.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Mishra, V., Thomas, G., & Sibly, T. F. (2004). Results of displaced subcapital fractures treated by primary total hip replacement. Injury, 35(2), 157–160.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Randell, A. J., Nguyen, T. V., Bhalerao, N., Silverman, S. L., Sambrook, P. N., & Eisman, J. A. (2000). Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: A prospective study. Osteoporosis International, 11, 460–466.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Rohde, G., Haugeberg, G., Mengshoel, A. M., Moum, T., & Wahl, A. K. (2010). Two-year changes in quality of life in elderly patients with low-energy hip fractures. A case-control study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11, 226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
71.
Hall, S. E., Williams, J. A., Senior, J. A., Goldswain, P. R., & Criddle, R. A. (2000). Hip fracture outcomes: Quality of life and functional status in older adults living in the community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 30(3), 327–332.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Shepherd, S. M., & Prescott, R. J. (1996). Use of standardised assessment scales in elderly hip fracture patients. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 30(4), 335–343.PubMed
73.
Griffiths, F., Mason, V., Boardman, F., Dennick, K., Haywood, K., et al. (2015). Evaluating recovery following hip fracture: A qualitative study of what is important to patients. BMJ Open, 5(1), e005406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
74.
Haywood, K., Brett, J., Salek, S., Marlett, N., Penman, C., Shklarov, S., et al. (2015). Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: What’s important and why should we care? Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1069–1076.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Seitz, D. P., Adunuri, N., Gill, S. S., & Rochon, P. A. (2011). Prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment among older adults with hip fractures. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 12, 556–564.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Allan, L. M., Ballard, C. G., Rowan, E. N., & Kenny, R. A. (2009). Incidence and prediction of falls in dementia: A prospective study in older people. PLoS One, 4(5), e5521.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77.
Jones, C. A., & Feeny, D. H. (2006). Agreement between patient and proxy responses during recovery after hip fracture: Evidence for the FIM Instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1382–1387.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Fitzpatrick, R., Davey, C., Buxton, M. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2(14).
79.
Binder, E. F., Brown, M., & Sinacore, D. R. (2004). Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 292(7), 837–846.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Pusic, A. L., Chen, C. M., Cano, S., Klassen, A., McCarthy, C., Collins, E. D., et al. (2007). Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120(4), 823–837.CrossRefPubMed
81.
Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliography study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ, 324(7351), 1417.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
82.
83.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
84.
Boonen, S., Autier, P., Barette, M., Vanderschueren, D., Lips, P., & Haentjens, P. (2004). Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: A prospective controlled study. Osteoporosis International, 15, 87–94.CrossRefPubMed
85.
Haywood, K. L., Griffin, X. L., Achten, J., & Costa, M. L. (2014). Developing a care outcome set for hip fracture trials. The Bone & Joint Journal, 96-B(8), 1016–1023.CrossRef
86.
Connell, J., O’Cathain, A., & Brazier, J. (2014). Measuring quality of life in mental health: Are we asking the right questions? Social Science and Medicine, 120, 12–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
87.
Duppils, G. S., & Wikblad, K. (2004). Cognitive function and health-related quality of life after delirium in connection with hip surgery: A six-month follow-up. Orthopaedic Nursing, 23(3), 195–203.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Patient-reported outcome measures in older people with hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability
Auteurs
K. L. Haywood
J. Brett
E. Tutton
S. Staniszewska
Publicatiedatum
20-10-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1424-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2017

Quality of Life Research 4/2017 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Testing whether patients with diabetes and healthy people perceive the meaning of the items in the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire similarly: a differential item functioning analysis

OriginalPaper

Mental health and health-related quality of life of Chinese college students who were the victims of dating violence

OriginalPaper

Testing the psychometric properties of Kidscreen-27 with Irish children of low socio-economic status

OriginalPaper

Dating violence, quality of life and mental health in sexual minority populations: a path analysis

OriginalPaper

When global rating of change contradicts observed change: Examining appraisal processes underlying paradoxical responses over time

OriginalPaper

Assessment of health-related quality of life, mental health status and psychological distress based on the type of pharmacotherapy used among patients with depression