Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2015 | Brief Communication

The Dutch Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): a reliability and validation study

Auteurs: Marloes Thoomes-de Graaf, Gwendolijne G. M. Scholten-Peeters, Edwin Duijn, Yasmaine Karel, Bart W. Koes, Arianne P. Verhagen

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2015

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Dutch Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI-D).

Background

The SPADI is recommended and frequently used. However, the validity and reliability of the SPADI-D are unknown.

Methods

The study population consisted of patients consulting a physical therapist for shoulder pain. We assessed construct validity, using known groups, convergent validity (SDQ) and divergent validity (EQ5D) for which the mean difference or Spearman correlations coefficients were calculated. The factor structure was assessed using principal component factor analysis, and we calculated Cronbach’s alpha and the ICC to assess the reliability.

Results

A total of 356 patients and a randomly selected group of 74 subjects for the reliability analysis were included. There was a significant difference between extreme groups (a high/low level of pain and work absence/presence) in SPADI score. The correlation between the SPADI and the SDQ was 0.69, with the EQ5D mobility-item 0.25 and with the depression-item 0.14. The SPADI consisted of one factor according to principal component factor analysis, which showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94 for the total score), and the test–retest reliability was good (ICC = 0.89).

Conclusion

The Dutch SPADI is a valid and reliable questionnaire for patients in primary care in assessing functional disability.

vorige artikel Development and validation of the Somali WHOQOL-BREF among refugees living in the USA

volgende artikel Defining novel health-related quality of life domains in lung transplantation: a qualitative analysis

Feleus, A., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M., Miedema, H. S., Verhaar, J. A., & Koes, B. W. (2008). Management in non-traumatic arm, neck and shoulder complaints: Differences between diagnostic groups. European Spine Journal, 17(9), 1218–1229.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

van der Windt, D. A., van der Heijden, G. J., de Winter, A. F., Koes, B. W., Deville, W., & Bouter, L. M. (1998). The responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 57(2), 82–87.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Mintken, P. E., Glynn, P., & Cleland, J. A. (2009). Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 18(6), 920–926.PubMedCrossRef

Paul, A., Lewis, M., Shadforth, M. F., Croft, P. R., Van Der Windt, D. A., & Hay, E. M. (2004). A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63(10), 1293–1299.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Roach, K. E., Budiman-Mak, E., Songsiridej, N., & Lertratanakul, Y. (1991). Development of a Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Arthritis Care & Research, 4(4), 143–149.CrossRef

Jamnik, H., & Spevak, M. K. (2008). Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: Validation of slovene version. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 31(4), 337–341.PubMedCrossRef

Christiansen, D. H., Andersen, J. H., & Haahr, J. P. (2013). Cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the Danish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(4), 355–360.PubMedCrossRef

Ekeberg, O. M., Bautz-Holter, E., Tveita, E. K., Keller, A., Juel, N. G., & Brox, J. I. (2008). Agreement, reliability and validity in 3 shoulder questionnaires in patients with rotator cuff disease. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9, 68.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Bot, S. D., Terwee, C. B., van der Windt, D. A., Bouter, L. M., Dekker, J., & de Vet, H. C. (2004). Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63(4), 335–341.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

10.

Jansen, M. J., Brooijmans, F., Geraets, J. J. X. R., Lenssen, A. F., Ottenheijm, R. P. G., Penning, L. I. F., et al. (2011). KNGF Evidence Statement Subacromiale klachten. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie, 121(1).

11.

Karel, Y. H., Scholten-Peeters, W. G., Thoomes-de Graaf, M., Duijn, E., Ottenheijm, R. P., Koes, B. W., et al. (2013). Current management and prognostic factors in physiotherapy practice for patients with shoulder pain: Design of a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14(1), 62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

12.

de Winter, A. F., van der Heijden, G. J., Scholten, R. J., van der Windt, D. A., & Bouter, L. M. (2007). The Shoulder Disability Questionnaire differentiated well between high and low disability levels in patients in primary care, in a cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(11), 1156–1163.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Lamers, L. M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P. F., Krabbe, P. F., & Busschbach, J. J. (2006). The Dutch tariff: Results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics, 15(10), 1121–1132.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales a practical guide to the development and use. Oxford: Oxford university press.

15.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 22.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

16.

Hallman, D. M., Ekman, A. H., & Lyskov, E. (2014). Changes in physical activity and heart rate variability in chronic neck-shoulder pain: Monitoring during work and leisure time. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 87(7), 735–744.

17.

Roh, Y. H., Noh, J. H., Oh, J. H., Baek, G. H., & Gong, H. S. (2012). To what degree do shoulder outcome instruments reflect patients’ psychologic distress? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 470(12), 3470–3477.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

18.

O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402.CrossRef

19.

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Patil, V. H., Surendra, N. S., Sanjay, M., & Donovan, T. (2008). “Parallel analysis engine to aid determining number of factors to retain computer software. http://smishra.faculty.ku.edu/parallelengine.htm; utility developed as part of Patil, Vivek H., Surendra N. Singh, Sanjay Mishra, and Todd Donovan. (2008). “Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: A case for abandoning the ‘eigenvalue greater than one’ criterion”. Journal of Business Research, 61 (2), 162–170.

21.

Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.CrossRef

22.

de Vet, H. C., Ader, H. J., Terwee, C. B., & Pouwer, F. (2005). Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1203–1218. (dicussion 1219–1221, 1223–1204).PubMedCrossRef

23.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Staples, M. P., Forbes, A., Green, S., & Buchbinder, R. (2010). Shoulder-specific disability measures showed acceptable construct validity and responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(2), 163–170.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Cloke, D. J., Lynn, S. E., Watson, H., Steen, I. N., Purdy, S., & Williams, J. R. (2005). A comparison of functional, patient-based scores in subacromial impingement. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 14(4), 380–384.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Hill, C. L., Lester, S., Taylor, A. W., Shanahan, M. E., & Gill, T. K. (2011). Factor structure and validity of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in a population-based study of people with shoulder symptoms. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

27.

Tveita, E. K., Sandvik, L., Ekeberg, O. M., Juel, N. G., & Bautz-Holter, E. (2008). Factor structure of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 9, 103.

28.

MacDermid, J. C., Solomon, P., & Prkachin, K. (2006). The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7, 12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

29.

Roddey, T. S., Olson, S. L., Cook, K. F., Gartsman, G. M., & Hanten, W. (2000). Comparison of the University of California—Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and the simple shoulder test with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: Single-administration reliability and validity. Physical Therapy, 80(8), 759–768.PubMed

30.

Bicer, A., & Ankarali, H. (2010). Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: A validation study in Turkish women. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(11), 865–870.PubMed

31.

Tveita, E. K., Ekeberg, O. M., Juel, N. G., & Bautz-Holter, E. (2008). Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9, 161.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

32.

Jeldi, A. J., Aseer, A. L., Dhandapani, A. G., & Roach, K. E. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Indian (Tamil) version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 30(2), 99–104.

33.

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (pro) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health, 8(2), 94–104.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Kooijman, M., Barten, J., Swinkels, I., & Veenhof, C. J. (2010). En trendcijfers 2006–2010 fysiotherapie. Landelijke Informatievoorziening Paramedische Zorg. Utrecht: NIVEL. http://www.nivel.nl/lipz

Titel: The Dutch Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): a reliability and validation study
Auteurs: Marloes Thoomes-de Graaf
Gwendolijne G. M. Scholten-Peeters
Edwin Duijn
Yasmaine Karel
Bart W. Koes
Arianne P. Verhagen
Publicatiedatum: 01-06-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0879-1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2015

The emotional distress of children with cancer in China: an item response analysis of C-Ped-PROMIS Anxiety and Depression short forms

Population norms for the EQ-5D index scores using Singapore preference weights

Evaluating quality of life and response shift from a couple-based perspective: a study among patients with colorectal cancer and their partners

Development of the Alcohol Quality of Life Scale (AQoLS): a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess health-related quality of life in alcohol use disorder

The relationship among caregiving characteristics, caregiver strain, and health-related quality of life: evidence from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin

Girls’ quality of life prior to detention in relation to psychiatric disorders, trauma exposure and socioeconomic status