Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-08-2014 | Brief Communication

The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity

Auteurs: Marco Monticone, Simona Ferrante, Silvano Ferrari, Calogero Foti, Raffaele Mugnai, Paolo Pillastrini, Barbara Rocca, Carla Vanti

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2014

Abstract

Purpose

To create an Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (PBAPI-I) and evaluate its psychometric properties.

Methods

The PBAPI was culturally adapted in accordance with international standards. The psychometric testing included factor analysis, investigating reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test/retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC), and exploring construct validity by comparing the PBAPI-I with a pain numerical rating scale (NRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (Pearson’s correlation).

Results

One hundred and sixty-seven subjects with chronic low back pain (83 % compliance) completed the tool. Factor analysis revealed a three-factor (Time, Mystery and Self-Blame), 16-item solution (explained variance: 80 %). The questionnaire was internally consistent (α = 0.91–0.96), and its stability was good (ICCs = 0.73–0.82). As expected, the construct validity estimates indicated that the Time and Mystery subscales moderately correlated with the NRS (r = 0.33–0.54), RMDQ (r = 0.34–0.47), PCS (r = 0.37–0.49) and TSK (r = 0.30–0.43), whereas the correlations between the Self-Blame subscale and the same measures were poorer. The correlations with the HADS were moderate and poor (anxiety: r = 0.37–0.05; depression: r = 0.39–0.07). Maladaptive coping strategies were more related to pain beliefs than adaptive strategies.

Conclusion

The PBAPI-I has good psychometric properties that replicate those of other versions.

vorige artikel Development and psychometric properties of the Maastricht Personal Autonomy Questionnaire (MPAQ) in older adults with a chronic physical illness

volgende artikel Reliability and validity of the Iranian version of the QAPACE in adolescents

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Williams, D. A., & Thorn, B. E. (1989). An empirical assessment of pain beliefs. Pain, 36, 351–358.PubMedCrossRef

Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M. (1994). Correlates of improvement in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 172–179.PubMedCrossRef

Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Huger, P. (1987). The development and preliminary validation of an instrument to assess patients’ attitudes towards pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 31, 393–400.PubMedCrossRef

Strong, J., Ashton, R., & Chant, D. (1992). The measurement of attitudes towards and beliefs about pain. Pain, 48, 227–236.PubMedCrossRef

Herda, C. A., Siegeris, K., & Basler, H. D. (1994). The Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: Further evidence for a 4-factor structure. Pain, 57, 85–90.PubMedCrossRef

Williams, D. A., Robinson, M. E., & Geisser, M. E. (1994). Pain beliefs: Assessment and utility. Pain, 59, 71–78.PubMedCrossRef

Morley, S., & Wilkinson, L. (1995). The Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: A British replication. Pain, 61, 427–433.PubMedCrossRef

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 3186–3189.CrossRef

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health, 8(2), 94–104.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34–42.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Huskinson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. Lancet, 2, 1127–1131.CrossRef

12.

Padua, R., Padua, L., Ceccarelli, E., Romanini, E., Zanoli, G., Bondì, R., et al. (2002). Italian version of the Roland disability questionnaire, specific for low back pain: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. European Spine Journal, 11(2), 126–129.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

13.

Monticone, M., Baiardi, P., Ferrari, S., Foti, C., Mugnai, R., Pillastrini, P., et al. (2012). Development of the Italian version of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Quality of Life Research, 21(6), 1045–1050.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Monticone, M., Giorgi, I., Baiardi, P., Barbieri, M., Rocca, B., & Bonezzi, C. (2010). Development of the Italian version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK-I. Cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35(12), 1241–1246.

15.

Costantini, M., Musso, M., & Viterbori, P. (1999). Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: Validity of the Italian version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Supportive Care in Cancer, 7(3), 121–127.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Monticone, M., Ferrante, S., Giorgi, I., Galandra, C., Rocca, B., & Foti, C. (2013). Development of the Italian version of the 42-item Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, CPCI-I: Cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity. Quality of Life Research, 22(6), 1459–1465.

17.

Wong, W. S., Williams, D. A., Mak, K. H., & Fielding, R. (2011). Assessing attitudes toward and beliefs about pain among Chinese patients with chronic pain: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (ChPBPI). Journal of Pain and Symptoms Management, 42(2), 308–318.CrossRef

Titel: The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity
Auteurs: Marco Monticone
Simona Ferrante
Silvano Ferrari
Calogero Foti
Raffaele Mugnai
Paolo Pillastrini
Barbara Rocca
Carla Vanti
Publicatiedatum: 01-08-2014
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0621-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2014

Anchoring vignettes for health comparisons: an analysis of response consistency

Depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and cardiac event-free survival in patients with heart failure: a mediation analysis

Understanding the relative importance of preserving functional abilities in Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and Germany

Conceptualizing and prioritizing clinical trial outcomes from the perspectives of people with Parkinson’s disease versus health care professionals: a concept mapping study

Positive and negative aspects of well-being as correlates of breast reconstruction decision

Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with celiac disease: patient-driven data from focus group interviews