Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2013

01-12-2013

Psychometric evaluation of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire and Visual Function Questionnaire Utility Index in patients with non-infectious intermediate and posterior uveitis

Auteurs: Rupali K. Naik, Katharine S. Gries, Anne M. Rentz, Jonathan W. Kowalski, Dennis A. Revicki

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) and Visual Function Questionnaire Utility Index (VFQ-UI) in patients with non-infectious intermediate and posterior uveitis.

Methods

Secondary analysis of pooled data from a 26-week, multicenter, masked, randomized, sham-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the NEI VFQ-25, the EQ-5D, and SF-36. Internal consistency reliability, reproducibility, convergent validity, and known groups of BCVA and vitreous haze severity were assessed. Clinically significant difference was assessed using anchor-based and distribution-based methods.

Results

The study included 224 subjects with non-infectious intermediate (80.4 %) or posterior uveitis (19.6 %). The NEI VFQ-25 and the VFQ-UI demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.87–0.94) and test–retest reliability (ICCs 0.58–0.88). Spearman’s product–moment rank correlations between the NEI VFQ-25 and VFQ-UI scores and the SF-6D, EQ-5D, and BCVA ranged from small to moderate. There was a significant association between visual functioning and known groups of visual acuity (p < 0.05). Clinical significance, using the anchor-based method (difference between visual acuity groups ≥10–<15 letter better and no change), was 10.2 for change from baseline to week 26 for the NEI VFQ-25 composite score and 0.05 for the VFQ-UI. Using the distribution-based method, the clinical significance was 3.86 for the composite score and 0.04 for the VFQ-UI.

Conclusion

The NEI VFQ-25 and the VFQ-UI are reliable and valid measures of vision-related functioning and preference-based status in patients with non-infectious intermediate and posterior uveitis.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Durrani, O. M., Meads, C. A., & Murray, P. I. (2004). Uveitis: A potentially blinding disease. Ophthalmologica, 218(4), 223–236.PubMedCrossRef Durrani, O. M., Meads, C. A., & Murray, P. I. (2004). Uveitis: A potentially blinding disease. Ophthalmologica, 218(4), 223–236.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Markomichelakis, N. N., Halkiadakis, I., Pantelia, E., Peponis, V., Patelis, A., Theodossiadis, P., et al. (2004). Patterns of macular edema in patients with uveitis: Qualitative and quantitative assessment using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology, 111(5), 946–953.PubMedCrossRef Markomichelakis, N. N., Halkiadakis, I., Pantelia, E., Peponis, V., Patelis, A., Theodossiadis, P., et al. (2004). Patterns of macular edema in patients with uveitis: Qualitative and quantitative assessment using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology, 111(5), 946–953.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schiffman, R. M., Jacobsen, G., & Whitcup, S. M. (2001). Visual functioning and general health status in patients with uveitis. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119(6), 841–849.PubMedCrossRef Schiffman, R. M., Jacobsen, G., & Whitcup, S. M. (2001). Visual functioning and general health status in patients with uveitis. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119(6), 841–849.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mangione, C. M., Lee, P. P., Gutierrez, P. R., Spritzer, K., Berry, S., & Hays, R. D. (2001). Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119(7), 1050–1058.PubMedCrossRef Mangione, C. M., Lee, P. P., Gutierrez, P. R., Spritzer, K., Berry, S., & Hays, R. D. (2001). Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119(7), 1050–1058.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lowder, C., Belfort, R, Jr, Lightman, S., Foster, C. S., Robinson, M. R., Schiffman, R. M., et al. (2011). Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Archives of Ophthalmology, 129(5), 545–553.PubMedCrossRef Lowder, C., Belfort, R, Jr, Lightman, S., Foster, C. S., Robinson, M. R., Schiffman, R. M., et al. (2011). Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Archives of Ophthalmology, 129(5), 545–553.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rentz, A. M., Kowalski, J. W., Walt, J., Hays, R. D., Brazier, J. E., Yu, R., Lee, P., Bressler, N. M., & Revicki, D. A. (submitted.). Developing a preference-based single index for the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. Arch Opth. Rentz, A. M., Kowalski, J. W., Walt, J., Hays, R. D., Brazier, J. E., Yu, R., Lee, P., Bressler, N. M., & Revicki, D. A. (submitted.). Developing a preference-based single index for the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. Arch Opth.
7.
go back to reference Kowalski, J. W., Rentz, A. M., Walt, J., Lloyd, A., Young, D., Chen, W. H., Bressler, N. M., Lee, P., Brazier, J. E., Hays, R. D., & Revicki, D. A. (2011). Development of a classification system for health states from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. Quality of life research. August 04, 2011. (Epub ahead of print). Kowalski, J. W., Rentz, A. M., Walt, J., Lloyd, A., Young, D., Chen, W. H., Bressler, N. M., Lee, P., Brazier, J. E., Hays, R. D., & Revicki, D. A. (2011). Development of a classification system for health states from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. Quality of life research. August 04, 2011. (Epub ahead of print).
8.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A users manual. Boston: The Health Institute. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A users manual. Boston: The Health Institute.
9.
go back to reference Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.PubMedCrossRef Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1, 4.PubMedCrossRef Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1, 4.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fryback, D. G., Dunham, N. C., Palta, M., Hanmer, J., Buechner, J., Cherepanov, D., et al. (2007). US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Medical Care, 45(12), 1162–1170.PubMedCrossRef Fryback, D. G., Dunham, N. C., Palta, M., Hanmer, J., Buechner, J., Cherepanov, D., et al. (2007). US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Medical Care, 45(12), 1162–1170.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Brooks, R., Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2003). The measurement and validation of health status suing EQ-5D: A European perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Brooks, R., Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2003). The measurement and validation of health status suing EQ-5D: A European perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ferris, F. L, 3rd, Kassoff, A., Bresnick, G. H., & Bailey, I. (1982). New visual acuity charts for clinical research. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 94(1), 91–96.PubMed Ferris, F. L, 3rd, Kassoff, A., Bresnick, G. H., & Bailey, I. (1982). New visual acuity charts for clinical research. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 94(1), 91–96.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hays, R. D., & Revicki, D. (2005). Reliability and validity (including responsiveness). In P. Fayers & R. D. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 25–40). New York: Oxford University Press. Hays, R. D., & Revicki, D. (2005). Reliability and validity (including responsiveness). In P. Fayers & R. D. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 25–40). New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
go back to reference Gritz, D. C., & Wong, I. G. (2004). Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in northern California: The northern California epidemiology of uveitis study. Ophthalmology, 111, 491–500.PubMedCrossRef Gritz, D. C., & Wong, I. G. (2004). Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in northern California: The northern California epidemiology of uveitis study. Ophthalmology, 111, 491–500.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Medical Care, 27, S178–S189.PubMedCrossRef Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Medical Care, 27, S178–S189.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Liang, M. J., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G. (1990). Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care, 28, 632–642.PubMedCrossRef Liang, M. J., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G. (1990). Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care, 28, 632–642.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109.PubMedCrossRef Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chan, C. C., Inrig, T., Molloy, C. B., Stone, M. A., & Derzko-Dzulynsky, L. (2012). Prevalence of inflammatory back pain in a cohort of patients with anterior uveitis. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 153, 1025–1030.PubMedCrossRef Chan, C. C., Inrig, T., Molloy, C. B., Stone, M. A., & Derzko-Dzulynsky, L. (2012). Prevalence of inflammatory back pain in a cohort of patients with anterior uveitis. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 153, 1025–1030.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Frick, K. D., Drye, L. T., Kempen, J. H., Dunn, J. P., Holland, G. N., Latkany, P., et al. (2012). Associations among visual acuity and vision- and health-related quality of life among patients in the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 53, 1169–1176.PubMedCrossRef Frick, K. D., Drye, L. T., Kempen, J. H., Dunn, J. P., Holland, G. N., Latkany, P., et al. (2012). Associations among visual acuity and vision- and health-related quality of life among patients in the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 53, 1169–1176.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nussenblatt, R. B., & Whitcup, S. M. (2004). Uveitis: Fundamentals and clinical practice (3rd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby. Nussenblatt, R. B., & Whitcup, S. M. (2004). Uveitis: Fundamentals and clinical practice (3rd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric evaluation of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire and Visual Function Questionnaire Utility Index in patients with non-infectious intermediate and posterior uveitis
Auteurs
Rupali K. Naik
Katharine S. Gries
Anne M. Rentz
Jonathan W. Kowalski
Dennis A. Revicki
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0412-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2013

Quality of Life Research 10/2013 Naar de uitgave