Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 5/2013

01-06-2013 | Brief Communication

Adaptation into Spanish of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and preliminary validation in a student sample

Auteurs: María Andrée López, Andrea Gabilondo, Miquel Codony, Carlos García-Forero, Gemma Vilagut, Pere Castellví, Montse Ferrer, Jordi Alonso

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

There is growing interest in the assessment of positive mental health as a global indicator of societal wealth. We aimed to adapt the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being scale (WEMWBS) into Spanish and to perform a preliminary evaluation of its metric properties.

Methods

Forward and back-translations and cognitive debriefing were carried out. University students (n = 148) were recruited to evaluate the final Spanish version, following the UK original study. Distribution of WEMWBS responses, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, and factor structure were assessed.

Results

Only 4 (out of 14) items of the initial Spanish version were not rated as conceptually and linguistically equivalent to the original and were modified. The final version was clear and comprehensible. Global score’s Cronbach’s alpha (0.90), item-total score correlations (0.44–0.76), and test–retest ICC (0.84) were all satisfactory. Moderate to high correlations (r = 0.45–0.70) were observed between the WEMWBS and validity scales. Preliminary confirmatory factor analyses did not support the hypothesis of a single factor.

Conclusions

A conceptually equivalent Spanish version of the WEMWBS was obtained with high internal consistency, good test–retest reliability, and similar construct validity as the original instrument. Further validity and factorial studies are necessary in larger and more heterogeneous samples.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.PubMedCrossRef Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108.PubMedCrossRef Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gable, S., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and Why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110.CrossRef Gable, S., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and Why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence NDaMHWHO. (2003). Investing in mental health. Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence NDaMHWHO. (2003). Investing in mental health.
8.
go back to reference Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.PubMedCrossRef Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Keyes, C. L., Dhingra, S. S., & Simoes, E. J. (2010). Change in level of positive mental health as a predictor of future risk of mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2366–2371.PubMedCrossRef Keyes, C. L., Dhingra, S. S., & Simoes, E. J. (2010). Change in level of positive mental health as a predictor of future risk of mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2366–2371.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tennant, R., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). Monitoring positive mental health in Scotland: Validating the Affectometer 2 scale and developing the Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-being Scale for the UK. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland. Tennant, R., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). Monitoring positive mental health in Scotland: Validating the Affectometer 2 scale and developing the Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-being Scale for the UK. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland.
11.
go back to reference Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 63.PubMedCrossRef Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 63.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stewart-Brown, S., & Jamohamed, K. (2008). Warwick-Edinburg mental well-being Scale: User guide. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland. Stewart-Brown, S., & Jamohamed, K. (2008). Warwick-Edinburg mental well-being Scale: User guide. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland.
13.
go back to reference Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kelley, T. L. (1942). The reliability coefficient. Psychometrika, 7, 75–85.CrossRef Kelley, T. L. (1942). The reliability coefficient. Psychometrika, 7, 75–85.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, misuse and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.PubMedCrossRef Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, misuse and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bentler, P. M. (2008). Alpha, dimension-free and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137–143.CrossRef Bentler, P. M. (2008). Alpha, dimension-free and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137–143.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Helms, J., Henze, K., Sass, T., & Mifsud, V. (2006). Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 630–660.CrossRef Helms, J., Henze, K., Sass, T., & Mifsud, V. (2006). Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 630–660.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 231–240.PubMed Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 231–240.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Cohen, A. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cohen, A. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
go back to reference Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (1998–2010) (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (1998–2010) (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
21.
go back to reference Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 625–641.CrossRef Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 625–641.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jackson, D. L. (2001). Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 205–223.CrossRef Jackson, D. L. (2001). Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 205–223.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 15.PubMedCrossRef Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 15.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Adaptation into Spanish of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and preliminary validation in a student sample
Auteurs
María Andrée López
Andrea Gabilondo
Miquel Codony
Carlos García-Forero
Gemma Vilagut
Pere Castellví
Montse Ferrer
Jordi Alonso
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0238-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2013

Quality of Life Research 5/2013 Naar de uitgave