Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

01-08-2012 | Brief Communication

Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire in chronic pain patients

Auteurs: Sungkun Cho, Elaine M. Heiby, Lance M. McCracken, Dong-Eon Moon, Jang-Han Lee

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2012

Abstract

Purpose

Accepting pain rather than trying to control it has been the focus of recent pain management research. Pain acceptance often has been assessed using the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ). This study aimed to evaluate the factor structure and other psychometric properties of a Korean language version of the CPAQ (KCPAQ).

Methods

This study used two archival data sets collected over two different time periods at the same site in Korea, generating two samples (Total N = 361).

Results

Exploratory factor analysis using sample 1 (N = 182) provided support for the same two-factor structure as the original English CPAQ. Confirmatory factor analysis using sample 2 (N = 179) demonstrated the adequacy of the two-factor model obtained from sample 1. Samples 1 and 2 were combined for the reliability and validity analyses. The results indicated that the KCPAQ has good internal consistency and test–retest stability. The KCPAQ was significantly correlated with pain intensity, pain-related anxiety, depressive symptoms, physical adjustment, and psychosocial adjustment.

Conclusion

The KCPAQ has reliability and construct validity support for the measurement of pain acceptance in a Korean patient sample with chronic pain.

vorige artikel Construction and international validation of CIVIQ-14 (a short form of CIVIQ-20), a new questionnaire with a stable factorial structure

volgende artikel Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea

Kim, S. H., Bae, G. R., & Lim, H. S. (2006). Prevalence and risk factors of fibromyalgia syndrome and chronic widespread pain in two communities in Korea-First report in Korean. Journal of the Korean Rheumatism Association, 13, 18–25.

Turk, D. C., & Okifuji, A. (2002). Psychological factors in chronic pain: Evolution and revolution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 678–690.PubMedCrossRef

McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: Component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159–166.PubMedCrossRef

Reneman, M. F., Dijkstra, A., Geertzen, J. H. B., & Dijkstra, P. U. (2010). Psychometric properties of chronic pain acceptance questionnaires: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 14, 457–465.PubMedCrossRef

McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2003). Coping or acceptance: What to do with chronic pain? Pain, 105, 197–204.PubMedCrossRef

McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2006). A comparison of the relative utility of coping and acceptance-based measures in a sample of chronic pain sufferers. European Journal of Pain, 10, 23–29.PubMedCrossRef

McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Gauntlett-Gilbert, J. (2007). A prospective investigation of acceptance and control-oriented coping with chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 339–349.PubMedCrossRef

McCracken, L. M., & Vowles, K. E. (2005). Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1335–1346.PubMedCrossRef

Vowles, K. E., Wetherell, J. L., & Sorrell, J. T. (2009). Targeting acceptance, mindfulness, and valued-based action in chronic pain: Findings of two preliminary trials of an outpatient group-based intervention. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16, 49–58.CrossRef

10.

Vowles, K. E., McCracken, L. M., McLeod, C., & Eccleston, C. (2008). The chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis and identification of patient subgroups. Pain, 140, 284–291.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Wicksell, R. K., Olsson, G. L., & Melin, L. (2009). The chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ)—further validation including a confirmatory factor analysis and a comparison with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. European Journal of Pain, 13, 760–768.PubMedCrossRef

12.

McCracken, L. M., Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., & Eccleston, C. (2010). Acceptance of pain in adolescents with chronic pain: Validation of an adapted assessment instrument and preliminary correlation analyses. European Journal of Pain, 14, 316–320.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Nilges, P., Köster, B., & Schmidt, C. O. (2007). Pain acceptance–concept and validation of a German version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. Schmerz, 21, 60–67.CrossRef

14.

Rodero, B., Garcia-Campayo, J., Casanueva, B., del Hoyo, Y. L., Serrano-Blanco, A., & Luciano, J. V. (2010). Validation of the Spanish version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) for the assessment of acceptance in fibromyalgia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 37–46.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Ning, M. C., Ming, T. W., Mae, J. Y., & Ping, C. P. (2008). Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in Cantonese-speaking Chinese patients. Journal of Pain, 9, 823–832.PubMedCrossRef

16.

McCracken, L. M., & Dhingra, L. (2002). A short version of the pain anxiety symptoms scale (PASS-20): Preliminary development and validity. Pain Research and Management, 7, 45–50.PubMed

17.

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Fish, R. A., McGuire, B., Hogan, M., Morrison, T. G., & Stewart, I. (2010). Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain, 149, 435–443.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Ahn, B. C. (2010). Changes in sex roles in Korean society: The present state and responses. Society and Social Theory, 17, 257–277.

21.

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research Evaluation 2005; 10. Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7.

Titel: Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire in chronic pain patients
Auteurs: Sungkun Cho
Elaine M. Heiby
Lance M. McCracken
Dong-Eon Moon
Jang-Han Lee
Publicatiedatum: 01-08-2012
Uitgeverij: Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0010-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2012

The associations among coping, nadir CD4+ T-cell count, and non-HIV-related variables with health-related quality of life among an ambulatory HIV-positive patient population

Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties

Comparison of hypothetical and experienced EQ-5D valuations: relative weights of the five dimensions

Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea

Dizziness impairs health-related quality of life

Quality of life in panic disorder: looking beyond symptom remission