Abstract
In this paper, two scales are examined for the measurement of self-regulation. The item content is evaluated for its specific usefulness for measuring self-regulation of obesity patients. Qualitative facet analysis (QFA), an application of Guttmann’s Facet Theory, is used to investigate whether item content sufficiently covers the intended content area. This form of content analysis constitutes a systematic, effective and critical tool for improving the content validity of questionnaires. It discovers topics that are underrepresented or overrepresented. The method offers a way to clarify the relationship between concrete item phrases and the desired content as defined by construct and theory. It allows the researcher to improve his or her understanding of the items as a stimulus and of the similarities of items, and allows the formulation of a possible structure for confirmative factor analysis. Various ways to improve the content of both scales are identified.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borg I., Shye S.: Facet Theory: Form and Content. Sage, London (1995)
Cohen, E.H.: Facet Theory Bibliography. Facet Theory Association, Ljubljana–Jerusalem. Available online at: www.psy.mq.edu.au/FTA (2004). Accessed 8 September 2006
Cronbach L.J., Meehl P.E.: Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281–302 (1955)
Foa U.G.: The contiguity principle in the structure of interpersonal relations. Hum. Relat. 11, 229–238 (1958)
Foa U.G.: New developments in facet design and analysis. Psychol. Rev. 72, 262–274 (1965)
Guttman L.: The mapping sentence for assessing values. In: Levy, S.(eds) Louis Guttman on Theory and Methodology: Selected Writings, pp. 44–55. Aldershot, Dartmouth (1994)
Larsen, J.K.: Psychological predictors of outcome after gastric banding for morbid obesity. Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands (2004)
Leventhal H., Leventhal E.A., Contrada R.J.: Self-regulation, health, and behavior: a perceptual-cognitive approach. Psychology and Health 13, 717–733 (1998)
Levy S.: Louis Guttman on Theory and Methodology: Selected Writings. Aldershot, Dartmouth (1994)
Moss-Morris R., Weinman J., Petrie K.J., Horne R., Cameron L.D., Buick D.: The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol. Health 17, 1–16 (2002)
Rotter J.B.: Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol. Monogr. 80, 1–28 (1966)
Rotter J.B.: Internal versus external control of reinforcement: a case history of a variable. Am. Psychol. 45, 489–493 (1989)
Shye, S. (ed.): Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1978)
Shye, S., Elizur, D., Hoffman, M.: Introduction to Facet Theory: content design and intrinsic data analysis in behavioural research. Appl. Soc. Res. Methods Seri. 35. Sage, London (1994)
Weinman, J. Petrie K.J., Moss-Morris R., Horne R.: The illness perception questionnaire: new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness. Psychol. Health 11, 431–445 (1996)
Zijlstra H., Larsen J.K., van Ramshorst B., Geenen R.: The association between weight loss and self- regulation cognitions before and after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for obesity: a longitudinal study. Surgery 139, 334–339 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Landsheer, J.A., Boeije, H.R. In search of content validity: facet analysis as a qualitative method to improve questionnaire design. Qual Quant 44, 59–69 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9179-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9179-6