Skip to main content
Log in

Factor analysis of the Big Five Questionnaire using polychoric correlations in children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the Big Five Questionnaire for children (BFQ-C) (C. Barbaranelli et al., Manuale del BFQ-C. Big Five Questionnaire Children, O.S. Organizazioni, Firenze, 1998) is an ordinal scale, its dimensionality has often been studied using factor analysis with Pearson correlations. In contrast, the present study takes this ordinal metric into account and examines the dimensionality of the scale using factor analysis based on a matrix of polychoric correlations. The sample comprised 852 subjects (40.90% boys and 59.10% girls). As in previous studies the results obtained through exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional instability and openness). However, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis were consistent with both a four and five-factor structure, the former showing a slightly better fit and adequate theoretical interpretation. These data confirm the need for further research as to whether the factor ‘Openness’ should be maintained as an independent factor (five-factor model), or whether it would be best to omit it and distribute its items among the factors ‘Extraversion’ and ‘Conscientiousness’ (four-factor model).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aluja A., García O. and García L. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman’s three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg’s 50 bipolar adjectives. Pers. Individ. Diff. 33: 713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. and Rabasca A. (1998). Manuale del BFQ-C Big Five Questionnaire Children. O.S. Organizazioni Speciali, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaranelli C., Caprara G., Rabasca A. and Pastorelli C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Pers. Individ. Diff. 34: 645–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara J., Barbaranelli C., Borgogni L. and Perugini M. (1993). The big five questionnaire: a new questionnaire to assess the five-factor model. Pers. Individ. Diff. 15: 281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco M.A., Holgado F.P. and Del Barrio M.V. (2005). Dimensionalidad del cuestionario de los cinco grandes (BFQ-N) en población infantil española. Psicothema 17: 275–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Barrio, M.V., Carrasco, M.A.: Personalidad y diferencias por sexo y edad. In: Proceedings of the Actas del II Congreso Nacional SEIDI, Barcelona, 23–26 April 2003a

  • Del Barrio, M.V., Carrasco, M.A.: Personalidad y emociones infantiles. In Abstracts of the 29th Interamerican Congress of Psychology, Lima, 13–18 July 2003b

  • Digman J.M. (1997). Higher order factors of the big five. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 1246–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Struct. Equation Model. 9: 327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollan C.V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 4 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 47: 309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck H.J. (1992). A reply to Costa and McCrae: P or A and C the role of theory. Pers. Individ. Diff. 13: 867–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg L.R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: derivation of big five factor scores from each of six samples. J. Pers 69: 709–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilley W. and Uhlig G. (1993). Factor analysis and ordinal data. Education 114: 258–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog K.G. and Sörbom D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s Reference Guide. SSI, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampen J. and Swyngedouw M. (2000). The ordinal controversy revisited. Qual. Quant. 34: 87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb M., Chiang S., Wessels H., Broberg A. and Hwang C. (2002). Emergence and construct validation of the Big Five factors in early childhood: a longitudinal analysis of their ontogeny in Sweden. Child Dev. 73: 1517–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly B. (2000). Multivariate Statistical Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Markey P., Markey Ch., Tinsley B. and Ericksen A. (2002). A preliminary validation of preadolescents’ self-reports using the five factor model of personality. J. Res. Pers. 36: 173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maydeu A. and D’Zurilla T.J. (1995). A factor analysis of the social problem-solving inventory using polychoric correlations. Eur. J. Psychol.Assess. 11: 98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T. Jr.: Personality in Adulthood. New York (1990)

  • McCrae R.R. and Costa P.T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am. Psychol. 52: 509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervielde I., Buyst V. and Fruyt F. (1995). The validity of the Big Five as a model for teachers’ ratings of individual differences among children aged 4–12 years. Pers. Individ. Diff. 18: 525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervielde I. and De Fruyt F. (2000). The big five personality factors as a model for the structure of children’s peer nominations. Eur. J. Pers. 14: 91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montag I. and Levin J. (1994). The five-factor personality model in applied settings. Euro. J. Pers. 8: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén B. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and other non normal variables. In: Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models., pp. 1. Sage, NP

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggino A. (2000). The big three or the big five? A replication study. Pers. Individ. Diff. 28: 879–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte R. and De Bruyn E. (2004). Comparison of the giant three and the big five in early adolescents. Pers. Individ. Diff. 36: 1353–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Pablo Holgado-Tello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holgado-Tello, F.P., Carrasco-Ortiz, M.Á., del Barrio-Gándara, M.V. et al. Factor analysis of the Big Five Questionnaire using polychoric correlations in children. Qual Quant 43, 75–85 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9085-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9085-3

Keywords

Navigation