Abstract
This study examined associations of neighborhood structural factors (census-based measures, socioeconomic disadvantage, and residential stability); self-reported measures of general and substance use-specific risk factors across neighborhood, school, peer, and family domains; and sociodemographic factors with substance use among 9th grade students. Data drawn from the Seattle Social Development Project, a theory-driven longitudinal study originating in Seattle, WA, were used to estimate associations between risk factors and past month cigarette smoking, binge drinking, marijuana use, and polysubstance use among students (N = 766). Results of logistic regression models adjusting for neighborhood clustering and including all domains of risk factors simultaneously indicated that neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of cigarette smoking, binge drinking, and polysubstance use, but not marijuana use. In fully controlled models, substance use-specific risk factors across neighborhood, school, peer, and family domains were also associated with increased likelihood of substance use and results differed by the outcome considered. Results highlight substance-specific risk factors as an intervention target for reducing youth substance use and suggest that further research is needed examining mechanisms linking neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and youth substance use.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Some SSDP participants received a social development intervention during elementary school (Hill et al. 2016). Sensitivity tests controlling for the intervention in all domain models produced substantively similar results.
References
Anderson, P., De Bruijn, A., Angus, K., Gordon, R., & Hastings, G. (2009). Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 44(3), 229–243.
Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni Jr., A. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The communities that care youth survey. Evaluation Review, 26(6), 575–601.
Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Meacham, M. C., Young, S. E., & Hawkins, J. D. (2011). Strategies for characterizing complex phenotypes and environments: General and specific family environmental predictors of young adult tobacco dependence, alcohol use disorder, and co-occurring problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118(2), 444–451.
Blum, R. W., Beuhring, T., Shew, M. L., Bearinger, L. H., Sieving, R. E., & Resnick, M. D. (2000). The effects of race/ethnicity, income, and family structure on adolescent risk behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 90(12), 1879.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513.
Bryden, A., Roberts, B., McKee, M., & Petticrew, M. (2012). A systematic review of the influence on alcohol use of community level availability and marketing of alcohol. Health & Place, 18(2), 349–357.
Cambron, C., Guttmannova, K., & Fleming, C. B. (2017). State and national contexts in evaluating cannabis laws: A case study of Washington state. Journal of Drug Issues, 47(1), 74–90.
Cambron, C., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R. F., Guttmannova, K., & Hawkins, J. D. (2018). Neighborhood, family, and peer factors associated with early adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(2), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0728-y.
Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Newcomb, M. D., & Abbott, R. D. (1996). Modeling the etiology of adolescent substance use: A test of the social development model. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(2), 429–455.
Catalano, R. F., Fagan, A. A., Gavin, L. E., Greenberg, M. T., Irwin, C. E., Ross, D. A., & Shek, D. T. (2012). Worldwide application of prevention science in adolescent health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1653–1664.
Cavazos-Rehg, P. A., Krauss, M. J., Sowles, S. J., & Bierut, L. J. (2016). Marijuana-related posts on Instagram. Prevention Science, 17(6), 710–720.
Chilenski, S. M., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The importance of the community context in the epidemiology of early adolescent substance use and delinquency in a rural sample. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3–4), 287–301.
D’Amico, E. J., Miles, J., & Tucker, J. S. (2015). Gateway to curiosity: Medical marijuana ads and intention and use during middle school. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 1(1).
Diez Roux, A. V., & Mair, C. (2010). Neighborhoods and health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186(1), 125–145.
Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in intervention and public policy for youth. Social Policy Report. Volume 20, Number 1. Society for Research in Child Development.
Drope, J., Liber, A. C., Cahn, Z., Stoklosa, M., Kennedy, R., Douglas, C. E., et al. (2018). Who's still smoking? Disparities in adult cigarette smoking prevalence in the United States. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(2), 106–115.
Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2002). A multilevel analysis of neighborhood context and youth alcohol and drug problems. Prevention Science, 3(2), 125–133.
Dunne, T., Bishop, L., Avery, S., & Darcy, S. (2017). A review of effective youth engagement strategies for mental health and substance use interventions. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60(5), 487–512.
Elmore, K. C., Scull, T. M., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (2017). Media as a “super peer”: How adolescents interpret media messages predicts their perception of alcohol and tobacco use norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 376–387.
Epstein, M., Hill, K. G., Bailey, J. A., & Hawkins, J. D. (2013). The effect of general and drug-specific family environments on comorbid and drug-specific problem behavior: A longitudinal examination. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1151.
Fagan, A. A., Wright, E. M., & Pinchevsky, G. M. (2015). A multi-level analysis of the impact of neighborhood structural and social factors on adolescent substance use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 153, 180–186.
Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Lee, M. H., Johnson, R., Milam, A. J., Duncan, A., Reboussin, B. A., et al. (2015). Neighborhood environment and marijuana use in urban young adults. Prevention Science, 16(2), 268–278.
Gardner, M., Barajas, R. G., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2010). Neighborhood influences on substance use etiology: Is where you live important. Handbook of drug use etiology: Theory, methods, and empirical findings (pp. 423–441).
Hanson, M. D., & Chen, E. (2007). Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: A review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30(3), 263.
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64.
Hawkins, J. D., Jenson, J. M., Catalano, R., Fraser, M. W., Botvin, G. J., Shapiro, V., . . . Leslie, L. K. (2015). Unleashing the power of prevention: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.
Henriksen, L., Schleicher, N. C., Feighery, E. C., & Fortmann, S. P. (2010). A longitudinal study of exposure to retail cigarette advertising and smoking initiation. Pediatrics, 126(2), 232–238.
Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D., & Guo, J. (2005). Family influences on the risk of daily smoking initiation. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3), 202–210.
Hill, K. G., Woodward, D., Woelfel, T., Hawkins, J. D., & Green, S. (2016). Planning for long-term follow-up: Strategies learned from longitudinal studies. Prevention Science, 17(7), 806–818.
Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafò, M. (2012). Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1248(1), 107–123.
Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, R. A. (1998). A national portrait of family structure and adolescent drug use. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 633–645.
Jackson, N., Denny, S., & Ameratunga, S. (2014). Social and socio-demographic neighborhood effects on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of multi-level studies. Social Science & Medicine, 115, 10–20.
Jackson, N., Denny, S., Sheridan, J., Zhao, J., & Ameratunga, S. (2016). The role of neighborhood disadvantage, physical disorder, and collective efficacy in adolescent alcohol use: A multilevel path analysis. Health & Place, 41, 24–33.
Jenson, J. M., & Bender, K. (2014). Preventing child and adolescent problem behavior: Evidence-based strategies in schools, families, and communities.
Karriker-Jaffe, K. J. (2011). Areas of disadvantage: A systematic review of effects of area-level socioeconomic status on substance use outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(1), 84–95.
Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Guo, J., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2000). The dynamics of alcohol and marijuana initiation: Patterns and predictors of first use in adolescence. American Journal of Public Health, 90(3), 360.
Lee, J. O., Hill, K. G., Guttmannova, K., Bailey, J. A., Hartigan, L. A., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2012). The effects of general and alcohol-specific peer factors in adolescence on trajectories of alcohol abuse disorder symptoms from 21 to 33 years. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 121(3), 213–219.
Lee, J. G., Henriksen, L., Rose, S. W., Moreland-Russell, S., & Ribisl, K. M. (2015). A systematic review of neighborhood disparities in point-of-sale tobacco marketing. American Journal of Public Health, 105(9), e8–e18.
Lonczak, H. S., Huang, B., Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., Abbott, R. D., et al. (2001). The social predictors of adolescent alcohol misuse: A test of the social development model. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(2), 179–189.
Moore, H., Jones-Webb, R., Toomey, T., & Lenk, K. (2008). Alcohol advertising on billboards, transit shelters, and bus benches in inner-city neighborhoods. Contemporary Drug Problems, 35(2–3), 509–532.
Morrison, C., Gruenewald, P. J., Freisthler, B., Ponicki, W. R., & Remer, L. G. (2014). The economic geography of medical cannabis dispensaries in California. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(3), 508–515.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2013). Mplus 7.11. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Office of Surgeon General. (2016). Facing addiction in America: The surgeon general’s report on alcohol, drugs, and health. Washington, D.C.
Rudolph, K. E., Sofrygin, O., Schmidt, N. M., Crowder, R., Glymour, M. M., Ahern, J., & Osypuk, T. L. (2018). Mediation of neighborhood effects on adolescent substance use by the school and peer environments. Epidemiology, 29(4), 590–598.
Ryan, S. M., Jorm, A. F., & Lubman, D. I. (2010). Parenting factors associated with reduced adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44(9), 774–783.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing" neighborhood effects": Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 443–478.
Toumbourou, J. W., Stockwell, T., Neighbors, C., Marlatt, G., Sturge, J., & Rehm, J. (2007). Interventions to reduce harm associated with adolescent substance use. The Lancet, 369(9570), 1391–1401.
Van Ryzin, M. J., Fosco, G. M., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). Family and peer predictors of substance use from early adolescence to early adulthood: An 11-year prospective analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 37(12), 1314–1324.
Viner, R. M., Ozer, E. M., Denny, S., Marmot, M., Resnick, M., Fatusi, A., & Currie, C. (2012). Adolescence and the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1641–1652.
Wodtke, G. T., Elwert, F., & Harding, D. J. (2016). Neighborhood effect heterogeneity by family income and developmental period 1. American Journal of Sociology, 121(4), 1168–1222.
Zhang, X., Martinez-Donate, A. P., Kuo, D., Jones, N. R., & Palmersheim, K. A. (2012). Trends in home smoking bans in the USA, 1995–2007: Prevalence, discrepancies and disparities. Tobacco Control, 21(3), 330–336.
Funding
Data collection for this study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5R01DA003721 and 5R01DA033956). Support came from a National Poverty Research Center Dissertation Fellowship awarded by the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin–Madison with funding from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Cooperative Agreement number AE00103. Support for this study also came from the National Cancer Institute (award numbers F32CA232796 and P30CA042014) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (award numbers R24HD042828 and T32HD007543). The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policy of any agency of the Federal government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
R. F. Catalano is on the board of Channing Bete Company, distributer of prevention programs. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Washington and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(XLSX 596 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cambron, C., Kosterman, R., Rhew, I.C. et al. Neighborhood Structural Factors and Proximal Risk for Youth Substance Use. Prev Sci 21, 508–518 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01072-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01072-8