Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intention to Enact and Enactment of Gatekeeper Behaviors for Suicide Prevention: an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention was evaluated on a college campus to examine the impact of training on gatekeeper enactment of behaviors in support of suicide prevention and identify predictors of enactment of gatekeeper behaviors. Trained gatekeepers (N = 216) displayed greater perceived knowledge and self-efficacy for suicide prevention and reported higher rates of self-reported actual gatekeeper behaviors, including inquiring about suicidal ideation and referring for mental health treatment when they encountered someone in distress, compared to their untrained counterparts (N = 169). Consistent with the Theory of Planned Behavior, SEM results indicated that attitudes, self-efficacy, and perceived knowledge explained intentions to engage in gatekeeper behaviors, accounting for 59% of the variance in intentions to inquire about suicidal ideation and supporting the role of attitudes and perceived behavioral control in intentions to act. These intentions explained self-reported actual gatekeeper behaviors among participants who encountered someone in distress, with each one-point increase in intention associated with nearly twice the likelihood of both inquiring about suicidal ideation and referring someone for mental health care. On the other hand, self-reported situational barriers were associated with a decreased likelihood of referral behavior, indicating the role of actual behavioral control over volitional actions. Findings support the value of gatekeeper training for promoting factors that influence the likelihood of action on behalf of suicide prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Due to the number of variables and space restrictions, the results of the individual measurement models are not reported. Information about these models is available upon request from the first author.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26, 1113–1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2014). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.

  • Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Albright, G. (2013). Kognito interactive: At risk for college students. In Using virtual role-play with avatars to build gatekeeper skills among college students and student leaders Retrieved from http://resources.kognito.com/us/kognito_study_student_version.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H, Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36, 1065–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. H., Wyman, P. A., Brinales, J. M., & Gibbons, R. D. (2007). The role of randomized trials in testing interventions for the prevention of youth suicide. International Review of Psychiatry, 19, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, J. T., Carson, A. J., Sharpe, M., & Lawrie, S. M. (2003). Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 33, 395–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). WISQARS leading causes of death reports: National and regional. Retrieved from: http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/leadcaus10_us.html

  • Cooke, R., & French, D. P. (2008). How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior predict intentions and attendance at screening programs? A meta-analysis. Psychology & Health, 23, 745–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W., Matthieu, M. M., Lezine, D., & Knox, K. L. (2010). Does a brief suicide prevention gatekeeper training program enhance observed skills? Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 31, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W. F., Seaburn, D., Gibbs, D., Schmeelk-Cone, K., White, A. M., & Caine, E. D. (2011). Does practice make perfect? A randomized control trial of behavioral rehearsal on suicide prevention gatekeeper skills. Journal of Primary Prevention, 32, 195–211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goldston, D. B., Walrath, C. M., McKeon, R., Puddy, R. W., Lubell, K. M., Potter, L. B., & Rodi, M. S. (2010). The Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Suicide Prevention Program. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 40, 245–256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdi, E., Price, S., Qassem, T., Amin, Y., & Jones, D. (2008). Suicides not in contact with mental health services: Risk indicators and determinants of referral. Journal of Mental Health, 17, 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indelicato, N. A., Mirsu-Paun, A., & Griffin, W. D. (2011). Outcomes of a suicide prevention gatekeeper training on a university campus. Journal of College Student Development, 52, 350–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, M., Elias, B., Katz, L. Y., Belik, S. L., Deane, F. P., Enns, M. W., & Sareen, J. (2009). Gatekeeper training as a preventative intervention for suicide: A systematic review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 260–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the n:Q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 128–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. A., & Parsons, M. E. (2012). Adolescent suicide prevention in a school setting use of a gatekeeper program. NASN School Nurse, 27, 312–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, D. P., Schut, L. J., Puddy, R. W., Williams, L., Stephens, R. L., & McKeon, R. (2009). Tennessee lives count: Statewide gatekeeper training for youth suicide prevention. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimes-Dougan, B., Klingbeil, D. A., & Meller, S. J. (2013). The impact of universal suicide-prevention programs on the help-seeking attitudes and behaviors of youths. Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 34, 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger, K. (2002). Decision-based evaluation. In K. Kraiger (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development (pp. 331–375). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamis, D. A., Underwood, M., & D'Amore, N. (2016). Outcomes of a suicide prevention gatekeeper training program among school personnel. Crisis. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000414.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, S. (2013). A comprehensive review of mental health gatekeeper-trainings for adolescents and young adults. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 26, 305–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthieu, M. M., Chen, Y., Schohn, M., Lantinga, L. J., & Knox, K. L. (2009). Educational preferences and outcomes from suicide prevention training in the veteran’s health administration: One-year follow-up with healthcare employees in upstate New York. Military Medicine, 174, 1123–1131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. T., Cigularov, K. P., Chen, P. Y., Martinez, J. M., & Hindman, J. (2011). The effects of situational obstacles and social support on suicide-prevention gatekeeper behaviors. Crisis, 32, 264–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinnett, P. (1995). QPR: Ask a question, save a life. Spokane, Washington: The QPR Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinnett, P. (2014). QPR: Ask a question, save a life. Spokane, Washington: The QPR Institute Retrieved from www.qprinstitute.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, C., Waalen, J. K., & Haelstromm, E. (2003). Many helping hearts: An evaluation of peer gatekeeper training in suicide risk assessment. Death Studies, 27, 321–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Services Health Administration (2014). SAMHSA’s National Registry for Evidence-based Programs and Practices. Retrieved from http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/ViewAll.aspx

  • Teo, A. R., Andrea, S. B., Sakakibara, R., Motohara, S., Matthieu, M. M., & Fetters, M. D. (2016). Brief gatekeeper training for suicide prevention in an ethnic minority population: A controlled intervention. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, T. L., & Witt, J. (2009). The short-term effectiveness of a suicide prevention gatekeeper training program in a college setting of residence life advisers. Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 131–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Topa, G., & Moriano, J. A. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and smoking: Meta-analysis and SEM model. Substance Abuse & Rehabilitation, 1, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walrath, C., Garraza, L., Reid, H., Goldston, D. B., & McKeon, R. (2015). Impact of the Garrett Lee Smith Youth Suicide Prevention Program on suicide mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 986–993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, P. A., Brown, C. H., Inman, J., Cross, W., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Guo, J., & Pena, J. B. (2008). Randomized trial of a gatekeeper program for suicide prevention: One-year impact on secondary school staff. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 76, 104–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, P. A., Brown, C. H., LoMurray, M., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Petrova, M., Yu, Q., & Wang, W. (2010). An outcome evaluation of the Sources of Strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1653–1661.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yakunina, E. S., Rogers, J. R., Waehler, C. A., & Werth, J. L. (2010). College students' intentions to seek help for suicidal ideation: Accounting for the help-negation effect. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 40, 438–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by a grant from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan E. Walch.

Ethics declarations

Funding and Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

This research was supported in part by work funded through a campus suicide prevention grant (award# U79SM060495) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The study design, implementation, analysis, interpretation, and reporting were conducted independently from funding obligations, and SAMHSA had no role in the research or the preparation of this report. The authors declare that they have no other potential conflicts of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and Informed Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuhlman, S.T.W., Walch, S.E., Bauer, K.N. et al. Intention to Enact and Enactment of Gatekeeper Behaviors for Suicide Prevention: an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Prev Sci 18, 704–715 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0786-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0786-0

Keywords

Navigation