Skip to main content
Log in

Changing Friend Selection in Middle School: A Social Network Analysis of a Randomized Intervention Study Designed to Prevent Adolescent Problem Behavior

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescent friendships that promote problem behavior are often chosen in middle school. The current study examines the unintended impact of a randomized school-based intervention on the selection of friends in middle school, as well as on observations of deviant talk with friends 5 years later. Participants included 998 middle school students (526 boys and 472 girls) recruited at the onset of middle school (age 11–12 years) from three public middle schools participating in the Family Check-up model intervention. The current study focuses only on the effects of the SHAPe curriculum—one level of the Family Check-up model—on friendship choices. Participants nominated friends and completed measures of deviant peer affiliation. Approximately half of the sample (n = 500) was randomly assigned to the intervention, and the other half (n = 498) comprised the control group within each school. The results indicate that the SHAPe curriculum affected friend selection within school 1 but not within schools 2 or 3. The effects of friend selection in school 1 translated into reductions in observed deviancy training 5 years later (age 16–17 years). By coupling longitudinal social network analysis with a randomized intervention study, the current findings provide initial evidence that a randomized public middle school intervention can disrupt the formation of deviant peer groups and diminish levels of adolescent deviance 5 years later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, R. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R., & Beattie, I. R. (1999). High school experience and the risk of adult incarceration. Criminology, 37, 515–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, P. (2015). Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle. Social Networks, 40, 163–173. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521.

  • Burk, W. J., Van Der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2011). Alcohol use and friendship dynamics: Selection and socialization in early-, middle-, and late-adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York.

  • Davis, J. A. (1970). Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. American Sociological Review, 35, 843–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Ha, T., & Véronneau, M.-H. (2012). An ecological analysis of the effect of deviant peer clustering on sexual promiscuity, problem behavior, and childbearing from early adolescence to adulthood: An enhancement of the life history framework. Developmental Psychology, 48, 703–717. doi:10.1037/a0027304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). Intervening in adolescent problem behavior: A family-centered approach. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Kavanagh, K., Schneiger, A., Nelson, S., & Kaufman, N. K. (2002). Preventing early adolescent substance use: A family-centered strategy for the public middle school. Prevention Science, 3, 191–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., Winter, C. E., & Bullock, B. M. (2004). Adolescent friendship as a dynamic system: Entropy and deviance in the etiology and course of male antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 651–663. doi:10.1023/B:JACP.0000047213.31812.21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Owen, L. D. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of friendship and substance use: Bidirectional influence from adolescence to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 38, 480–491. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.38.4.480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Van Ryzin, M. J. (2011). Peer contagion dynamics in problem behavior and violence: Implications for intervention and policy. International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development Bulletin, 60, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Kavanagh, K. A. (2012). Everyday parenting: A professional's guide to building family management skills. Research Press: Champaign, IL, U.S.

  • Dodge, K. A., & McCourt, S. N. (2010). Translating models of antisocial behavioral development in efficacious intervention policy to prevent adolescent violence. Developmental Psychology, 52, 277–285. doi:10.1002/dev.20440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Swain-Campbell, N. R. (2002). Cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence and young adulthood. Addiction, 97, 1123–1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford-Smith, M., Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & McCord, J. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 255–265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Granic, I., & Dishion, T. J. (2003). Deviant talk in adolescent friendships: A step toward measuring pathogenic attractor process. Social Development, 12, 314–334. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, T., Dishion, T. J., Overbeek, G., Burk, W. J., & Engels, R. C. (2014). The blues of adolescent romance: Observed affective interactions in adolescent romantic relationships associated with depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 551–562. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9808-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436. doi:10.1086/226792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Ragan, D. T., Wallace, L., Gest, S. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Moody, J. (2013). Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: Influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 500–512. doi:10.1111/jora.12059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31, 548–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piehler, T. F., & Dishion, T. J. (2007). Interpersonal dynamics within adolescent friendships: Dyadic mutuality, deviant talk, and patterns of antisocial behavior. Child Development, 78, 1611–1624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Preciado, P. (2012). Manual for Siena version 4.0. Technical report. Oxford, England: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College.

  • Skiba, R. J., Peterson, R. L., & Williams, T. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary interventions in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ryzin, M. J., & Dishion, T. J. (2013). From antisocial behavior to violence: A model for the amplification role of coercive joining in adolescent friendships. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 661–669. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399–412. doi:10.1111/jora.12070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contribution of the Project Alliance staff, Portland public schools, and participating youths and families.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

Thomas J. Dishion received support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA07031) and (DA13773). Mark Van Ryzin received support from a grant awarded to Elizabeth A. Stormshak from the National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH20012).

Ethical Approval

The current study has been conducted in accordance with APA ethical guidelines for the participation of human subjects and a University Institutional Review Board approved the study that the data were drawn from.

Informed Consent

Informed consent procedures for human subjects were employed in accordance with APA ethical guidelines for the participation of human subjects and a University Institutional Review Board approved the informed consent procedures used in the current study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn DeLay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeLay, D., Ha, T., Van Ryzin, M. et al. Changing Friend Selection in Middle School: A Social Network Analysis of a Randomized Intervention Study Designed to Prevent Adolescent Problem Behavior. Prev Sci 17, 285–294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0605-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0605-4

Keywords

Navigation