Abstract
Adolescent friendships that promote problem behavior are often chosen in middle school. The current study examines the unintended impact of a randomized school-based intervention on the selection of friends in middle school, as well as on observations of deviant talk with friends 5 years later. Participants included 998 middle school students (526 boys and 472 girls) recruited at the onset of middle school (age 11–12 years) from three public middle schools participating in the Family Check-up model intervention. The current study focuses only on the effects of the SHAPe curriculum—one level of the Family Check-up model—on friendship choices. Participants nominated friends and completed measures of deviant peer affiliation. Approximately half of the sample (n = 500) was randomly assigned to the intervention, and the other half (n = 498) comprised the control group within each school. The results indicate that the SHAPe curriculum affected friend selection within school 1 but not within schools 2 or 3. The effects of friend selection in school 1 translated into reductions in observed deviancy training 5 years later (age 16–17 years). By coupling longitudinal social network analysis with a randomized intervention study, the current findings provide initial evidence that a randomized public middle school intervention can disrupt the formation of deviant peer groups and diminish levels of adolescent deviance 5 years later.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, R. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47–72.
Arum, R., & Beattie, I. R. (1999). High school experience and the risk of adult incarceration. Criminology, 37, 515–540.
Block, P. (2015). Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle. Social Networks, 40, 163–173. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.10.005.
Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521.
Burk, W. J., Van Der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2011). Alcohol use and friendship dynamics: Selection and socialization in early-, middle-, and late-adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89–98.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York.
Davis, J. A. (1970). Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. American Sociological Review, 35, 843–851.
Dishion, T. J., Ha, T., & Véronneau, M.-H. (2012). An ecological analysis of the effect of deviant peer clustering on sexual promiscuity, problem behavior, and childbearing from early adolescence to adulthood: An enhancement of the life history framework. Developmental Psychology, 48, 703–717. doi:10.1037/a0027304.
Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). Intervening in adolescent problem behavior: A family-centered approach. New York: Guilford.
Dishion, T. J., Kavanagh, K., Schneiger, A., Nelson, S., & Kaufman, N. K. (2002). Preventing early adolescent substance use: A family-centered strategy for the public middle school. Prevention Science, 3, 191–201.
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.
Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., Winter, C. E., & Bullock, B. M. (2004). Adolescent friendship as a dynamic system: Entropy and deviance in the etiology and course of male antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 651–663. doi:10.1023/B:JACP.0000047213.31812.21.
Dishion, T. J., & Owen, L. D. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of friendship and substance use: Bidirectional influence from adolescence to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 38, 480–491. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.38.4.480.
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180.
Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.
Dishion, T. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412.
Dishion, T. J., & Van Ryzin, M. J. (2011). Peer contagion dynamics in problem behavior and violence: Implications for intervention and policy. International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development Bulletin, 60, 6–11.
Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Kavanagh, K. A. (2012). Everyday parenting: A professional's guide to building family management skills. Research Press: Champaign, IL, U.S.
Dodge, K. A., & McCourt, S. N. (2010). Translating models of antisocial behavioral development in efficacious intervention policy to prevent adolescent violence. Developmental Psychology, 52, 277–285. doi:10.1002/dev.20440.
Elliott, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Swain-Campbell, N. R. (2002). Cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence and young adulthood. Addiction, 97, 1123–1135.
Gifford-Smith, M., Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & McCord, J. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 255–265.
Granic, I., & Dishion, T. J. (2003). Deviant talk in adolescent friendships: A step toward measuring pathogenic attractor process. Social Development, 12, 314–334. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00236.
Ha, T., Dishion, T. J., Overbeek, G., Burk, W. J., & Engels, R. C. (2014). The blues of adolescent romance: Observed affective interactions in adolescent romantic relationships associated with depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 551–562. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9808-y.
Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1–13.
Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436. doi:10.1086/226792.
Osgood, D. W., Ragan, D. T., Wallace, L., Gest, S. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Moody, J. (2013). Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: Influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 500–512. doi:10.1111/jora.12059.
Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31, 548–553.
Piehler, T. F., & Dishion, T. J. (2007). Interpersonal dynamics within adolescent friendships: Dyadic mutuality, deviant talk, and patterns of antisocial behavior. Child Development, 78, 1611–1624.
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59, 1–17.
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Preciado, P. (2012). Manual for Siena version 4.0. Technical report. Oxford, England: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College.
Skiba, R. J., Peterson, R. L., & Williams, T. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary interventions in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 295–315.
Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.
Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393.
Van Ryzin, M. J., & Dishion, T. J. (2013). From antisocial behavior to violence: A model for the amplification role of coercive joining in adolescent friendships. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 661–669. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12017.
Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399–412. doi:10.1111/jora.12070.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the contribution of the Project Alliance staff, Portland public schools, and participating youths and families.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
ᅟ
Funding
Thomas J. Dishion received support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA07031) and (DA13773). Mark Van Ryzin received support from a grant awarded to Elizabeth A. Stormshak from the National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH20012).
Ethical Approval
The current study has been conducted in accordance with APA ethical guidelines for the participation of human subjects and a University Institutional Review Board approved the study that the data were drawn from.
Informed Consent
Informed consent procedures for human subjects were employed in accordance with APA ethical guidelines for the participation of human subjects and a University Institutional Review Board approved the informed consent procedures used in the current study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeLay, D., Ha, T., Van Ryzin, M. et al. Changing Friend Selection in Middle School: A Social Network Analysis of a Randomized Intervention Study Designed to Prevent Adolescent Problem Behavior. Prev Sci 17, 285–294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0605-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0605-4