Abstract
Although there are a number of research-validated substance use prevention programs available for wide-scale dissemination, very little is known about the factors that influence adoption of evidence-based prevention programs in schools. We tested a model of the mechanisms of program adoption in schools that was guided by diffusion of innovations and social ecological theories. Cross-sectional data were collected from a sample of school district and county office of education tobacco use prevention education coordinators throughout California. Structural equation modeling was used to test the effects of community and organizational variables on the adoption of prevention programs via school administrators’ beliefs and the organization’s receipt of funding for the program. Results supported the hypothesis that the process of adoption begins with forming beliefs about the program, leading to adoption through the receipt of funding. In addition, we found direct effects of various community- and organizational-level factors on beliefs, receipt of funding, and adoption. These results are likely to inform policies that affect school districts’ use of evidence-based substance use prevention programming, which should ultimately lead to reductions in negative health outcomes among adolescents. Specifically, this study identifies various factors that could be targeted for improvement to enhance evidence-based program adoption. To our knowledge, this is the first study to empirically elucidate the process of adoption of evidence-based tobacco prevention programs in schools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beets, M., Flay, B., Vuchinich, S., Acock, A., Li, K.-K., & Allred, C. (2008). School climate and teachers’ beliefs and attitudes associated with implementation of the Positive Action program: A diffusion of innovations model. Prevention Science, 9, 264–275.
Bentler, P. M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 825–829.
Blake, S. M., Ledsky, R. A., Sawyer, R. J., Goodenow, C., Banspach, S., Lohrmann, D. K., et al. (2005). Local school district adoption of state-recommended policies on HIV prevention education. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 40, 239–248.
California Department of Education. (2001). Getting results: Developing safe and healthy kids update 2. Sacramento: Healthy Kids Program Office, California Department of Education.
California Department of Education. (2011a). County offices of education. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/sd/co/coes.asp.
California Department of Education. (2011b). Tobacco Use Prevention Education (TUPE) competitive grant applicants. Sacramento: Prepared by the Safe and Healthy Kids Program Office, California Department of Education.
California HealthyKids Resource Center. (2010). Research validated titles. Retrieved from http://www.californiahealthykids.org/c/@MxTzHUbt3Nbj2/Pages/searchres.html.
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. (2009). Identifying and selecting evidence-based interventions revised guidance document for the strategic prevention framework state incentive grant program. HHS Pub. No. (SMA)09-4205. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Cho, H., Hallfors, D. D., Iritani, B. J., & Hartman, S. (2009). The influence of “No Child Left Behind” legislation on drug prevention in US schools. Evaluation Review, 33, 446–463.
Coburn, C., Toure, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111, 1115–1161.
Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.
Ellickson, P. L. (1995). Schools. In R. H. Coombs & D. Ziedonis (Eds.), Handbook on drug abuse prevention: A comprehensive strategy to prevent the abuse of alcohol and other drugs (pp. 93–120). Needham Heights: Ally & Bacon.
Ennett, S. T., Ringwalt, C. L., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., Vincus, A., Simons-Rudolph, A., et al. (2003). A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings. Prevention Science, 4, 1–14.
Estabrooks, P. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Translating effective clinic-based physical activity interventions into practice. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31, 45–56.
Fagan, A. A., & Mihalic, S. (2003). Strategies for enhancing the adoption of school-based prevention programs: Lessons learned from the blueprints for violence prevention replications of the Life Skills Training program. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 235–253.
Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2008). Bridging science to practice: Achieving prevention program implementation fidelity in the community youth development study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 235–249.
Flay, B. (2009). School-based smoking prevention programs with the promise of long-term effects. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 5, 6.
Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness, and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.
Ginexi, E., Mabry, P., Collins, L., Rivera, D., Ridenour, T., Valente, T., et al. (2010). Systems science methodology for prevention science. Paper presented at the Society for Prevention Research 18th Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado.
Gingiss, P. M., Roberts-Gray, C., & Boerm, M. (2006). Bridge-It: A system for predicting implementation fidelity for school-based tobacco prevention programs. Prevention Science, 7, 197–207.
Green, L. W., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 29, 126–153.
Greenberg, M. T. (2010). School-based prevention: Current status and future challenges. Effective Education, 2, 27–52.
Gregory, A., Henry, D. B., & Schoeny, M. E. (2007). School climate and implementation of a preventive intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 250–260.
Hallfors, D., & Godette, D. (2002). Will the ‘Principles of Effectiveness’ improve prevention practice? Early findings from a diffusion study. Health Education Research, 17, 461–470.
Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. New York: Chapman and Hall/VRV, Taylor & Francis Group.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Kreuter, M. W., & Bernhardt, J. M. (2009). Reframing the dissemination challenge: A marketing and distribution perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2123–2127.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593.
Mihalic, S., Fagan, A., & Argamaso, S. (2008). Implementing the Life Skills Training drug prevention program: Factors related to implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 3, 5.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus: User’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
National Cancer Institute, & Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2010). Research-tested intervention programs. Retrieved from http://rtips.cancer.gov/rtips/index.do.
National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Health, & United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A research-based guide. Retrieved from http://www.nida.nih.gov/Prevention/Prevopen.html.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. In M. E. O’Connell, T. Boat, & K. E. Warner (Eds.), Committee on the prevention of mental disorders and substance abuse among children, youth, and young adults: Research advances and promising interventions. Washington: The National Academies Press.
Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools, & United States Department of Education. (2010). Exemplary and promising: Safe, disciplined, and drug-free schools programs. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/safety/exemplary01/report_pg9.html.
Payne, A. A., Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2006). School predictors of the intensity of implementation of school-based prevention programs: Results from a national study. Prevention Science, 7, 225–237.
Quality Education Direct Inc. (2009). QED California district 2008 database: Data users guide. Denver: Quality Education Direct Inc.
Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Vincus, A., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., & Simons-Rudolph, A. (2002). The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in US middle schools. Prevention Science, 3, 257–265.
Ringwalt, C., Hanley, S., Vincus, A., Ennett, S., Rohrbach, L., & Bowling, J. (2008). The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in the nation’s high schools. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29, 479–488.
Roberts-Gray, C., Gingiss, P. M., & Boerm, M. (2007). Evaluating school capacity to implement new programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 247–257.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rohrbach, L. A., Howard-Pitney, B., Unger, J. B., Dent, C. W., Howard, K. A., Cruz, T. B., et al. (2002). Independent evaluation of the California tobacco control program: Relationships between program exposure and outcomes, 1996–1998. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 975–984.
Rohrbach, L. A., Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S. T., & Vincus, A. A. (2005). Factors associated with adoption of evidence-based substance use prevention curricula in US school districts. Health Education Research, 20, 514–526.
Rohrbach, L. A., Grana, R., Sussman, S., & Valente, T. W. (2006). Type II translation: Transporting prevention interventions from research to real-world settings. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 29, 302–333.
Rohrbach, L. A., Gunning, M., Grana, R., Gunning, G., & Sussman, S. (2010). Dissemination of Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND): Findings from a survey of program adopters. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 2551–2566.
Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. B. (2008). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 465–486). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
SAS Institute Inc. SAS/C Online Doc TM. (2000). Release 9.0. Cary: SAS Institute.
Shinn, M. (2003). Understanding implementation of programs in multilevel systems. Prevention & Treatment, 6.
Skara, S., & Sussman, S. (2003). A review of 25 long-term adolescent tobacco and other drug use prevention program evaluations. Preventive Medicine, 37, 451–474.
Snyder, F., Vuchinich, S., Acock, A., Washburn, I., Beets, M., & Li, K. K. (2010). Impact of the positive action program on school-level indicators of academic achievement, absenteeism, and disciplinary outcomes: A matched-pair, cluster randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 26–55.
Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 33–63.
Spoth, R., Rohrbach, L., Greenberg, M., Leaf, P., Brown, C. H., Fagan, A., et al. (2013). Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: The translation science to population impact (TSci Impact) framework. Prevention Science, 14, 319–351.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, & United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). SAMHSA model programs. Retrieved from http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/.
United States Department of Health and Human Services, & Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2010). National registry of evidence-based programs and practices (NREPP). Retrieved from http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/index.asp.
Yu, C.-Y., & Muthén, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a dissertation grant from the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (grant #19DT-0002) to Melissa Little (P.I.). During development of the project, Dr. Little was supported as a predoctoral fellow on a training grant from the National Cancer Institute (grant #T32-CA 009492; Pentz, P.I.). While writing the manuscript, Dr. Little was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the National Cancer Institute (grant #R25 CA90956; Maskarinec, P.I.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Little, M.A., Pokhrel, P., Sussman, S. et al. The Process of Adoption of Evidence-based Tobacco Use Prevention Programs in California Schools. Prev Sci 16, 80–89 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0457-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0457-8