Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Universal Family-Focused Intervention with Young Adolescents: Effects on Health-Risking Sexual Behaviors and STDs Among Young Adults

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the prevalence and consequences of health-risking sexual behaviors (HRSBs) and STDs among young adults, their prevention is a public health priority. Emerging etiological and prevention outcome literatures suggested study of the long-term effects of universal family-focused interventions on young adult HRSBs and STDs. Although earlier studies have demonstrated intervention impact on adolescent substance misuse, no study has examined universal family-focused intervention effects on young adult HRSBs and STDs via reductions in adolescent misuse. Sixth grade students and their families enrolled in 33 rural Midwestern schools were randomly assigned to experimental conditions. Self-report questionnaires provided data at pretest (Ns = 238, 221, and 208 for the Iowa Strengthening Families Program [ISFP], Preparing for the Drug Free Years [PDFY], and control groups, respectively), with seven data points through young adulthood (age 21). In latent growth modeling, three young adult HRSB measures (number of sexual partners, condom use, substance use with sex) and lifetime STDs were specified as distal outcomes mediated by adolescent substance initiation growth factors (average level and rate of change). Results showed that the models fit the data and, except for condom use, there were significant indirect effects, with a higher frequency of significant findings for ISFP. The model additions of direct intervention effects on young adult outcomes generally were not supported, consistent with a model positing that long-term intervention effects on young adult HRSBs and STDs outcomes are indirect. As an indication of the practical significance of long-term effects, analyses revealed relative reduction rates ranging from 6 % to 46 % for significant outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The estimated sample size of those above the cut points was calculated from the model by multiplying the estimated proportions of those who were above the cut points for each condition by the corresponding condition sample size; the estimated proportion and sample size of those below the cut points were then calculated by subtraction. The predicted percentages above the cut points for intervention and control groups were used to calculate the Relative Reduction Rate (RRR) of each intervention for each outcome. The RRR is calculated by subtracting the estimated percentage of those above the cutoff in the intervention group from the estimated percentage of those above the cutoff in the control group and dividing by the estimated percentage above the cutoff in the control group.

References

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2002). Adolescent and School Health [Electronic version]. CDC Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Available [On-line]: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/index.htm

  • CDC. (1999). Prevention of genital HPV infection and sequelae: Report of an external consultant’s meeting. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2008). Trends in HIV- and STD-related risk behaviors among high school students—United States, 1991–2007. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 57, 817–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2011). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2010. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Dormitzer, C. M., Gutierrez, U., Vittetoe, K., Gonzalez, G. B., & Anthony, J. C. (2004). The adolescent behavioral repertoire as a context for drug exposure: Behavioral autarcesis at play. Addiction, 99, 897–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, H. W., Blandford, J. M., Gift, T. L., Tao, G., & Irwin, K. L. (2004). The estimated direct medical costs of sexually transmitted diseases among American youth, 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 11–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, D. L. (2008). Model misspecification in covariance structure models: Some implications for power and Type 1 error. Methodology, 4, 159–167.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiClemente, R. J. (2001). Development of programmes for enhancing sexual health. Lancet, 358, 1828–1829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., & Duncan, T. E. (1999). Exploring associations in developmental trends of adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior in a high-risk population. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 21–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eng, T. R., & Butler, W. T. (1997). The hidden epidemic: Confronting sexually transmitted diseases. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Pemberton, M., Foshee, V. A., Chuang, Y., King, T. S., & Koch, G. G. (2001). Mediation in a family-directed program for prevention of adolescent tobacco and alcohol use. Preventive Medicine, 33, 333–346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortenberry, J. D. (1995). Adolescent substance use and sexually transmitted diseases at risk: A review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 16, 304–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fouladi, R. T. (2000). Performance of modified test statistics in covariance and correlation structure analysis under conditions of multivariate non-normality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 356–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz, J. G., & Bray, J. H. (2005). Predicting heavy alcohol use among adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75, 102–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J., Chung, I. J., Hill, K., Hawkins, J., Catalano, R., & Abbott, R. (2002). Developmental relationships between adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior in young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 354–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Millstein, S. G., & Ellen, J. M. (1996). Relationship of alcohol use and risky sexual behavior: A review and analysis of findings. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 331–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Abbott, R. D. (2005). Promoting positive adult functioning through social development intervention in childhood: Long-term effects from the Seattle Social Development Project. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 159, 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Spoth, R., Haggerty, K. P., & Zhu, K. (1997). Effects of a preventive parent-training intervention on observed family interactions: Proximal outcomes from Preparing for the Drug Free Years. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, L., & Augustin, R. (2001). Measuring alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems: Comparison of responses from self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews. Addiction, 96, 459–471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I., & deLeeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., Molgaard, V., & Spoth, R. (1996). The Strengthening Families Program for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency (pp. 241–267). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leukefeld, C. G., & Edwards, R. W. (1999). Recommendations to bridge rural/urban drug-use(r) research and practice. Substance Use and Misuse, 34, 785–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R., Holtzman, D., Truman, B. I., Kann, L., Collins, J. L., & Kolbe, L. J. (1994). Substance use and HIV-related sexual behaviors among US high school students: Are they related? American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1116–1120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, N. E., Wells, G. A., Fisher, W. A., Warren, W. K., King, M. A., Doherty, J. A., & Bowie, W. R. (1990). High-risk STD/HIV behavior among college students. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 3155–3159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. A., Kosterman, R., Haggerty, K. P., Hawkins, J. D., Redmond, C., Spoth, R. L., & Shin, C. (2008). Dimensions of adolescent alcohol involvement as predictors of young adult major depression. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 275–285.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., Faden, V. B., Zucker, R. A., & Spear, L. P. (2008). Underage drinking: A developmental framework. Pediatrics, 121, S235–S251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melchior, A. (1998). National evaluation of learn and serve American school and community-based programs. Waltham: Center for Human Resources, Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th edn.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 42, 431–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (2003). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A researched-based guide (NIH Publication No. 04-4212). Rockville: Author.

  • Oesterle, S., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Guo, J., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2004). Adolescent heavy episodic drinking trajectories and health in young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65, 204–212.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Offord, D. R., & Bennett, K. J. (2002). Prevention. In M. Rutter & E. Taylor (Eds.), Child and adolescent psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 881–899). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. J., & Farkas, G. (1990). The effects of economic opportunity and family background on adolescent cohabitation and childbearing among low-income blacks. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satcher, D. (2001). The Surgeon General’s call to action to promote sexual health and responsible sexual behavior. Available at http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/news/pressreleases/pr_sexualhealth.pdf

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Goldman, M. S. (1995). Self-reported drinking and alcohol-related problems among early adolescents: Dimensionality and validity over 24 months. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 383–394.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, C. D., Morisky, D. E., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Lee, S.-J., & Ebin, V. J. (2004). Indices of lifetime polydrug use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 239–249.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and thier standard erroes in covariance structure models. In. N. B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 159-186). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1994). Effective recruitment of parents into family-focused prevention research: A comparison of two strategies. Psychology and Health: An International Journal, 9, 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Hockaday, C., & Yoo, S. (1996a). Protective factors and young adolescent tendency to abstain from alcohol use: A model using two waves of intervention study data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 749–770. PMID: 9194328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Yoo, S., Kahn, J. H., & Redmond, C. (1996b). A model of the effects of protective parent and peer factors on young adolescent alcohol refusal skills. Journal of Primary Prevention, 16, 373–394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (1998). Direct and indirect latent-variable parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: Extending a public health-oriented research base. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 385–399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Goldberg, C., & Redmond, C. (1999). Engaging families in longitudinal preventive intervention research: Discrete-time survival analysis of socioeconomic and social-emotional risk factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 157–163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2001). Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: Adolescent substance use outcomes four years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 627–642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Guyll, M., & Day, S. X. (2002). Universal family-focused interventions in alcohol-use disorder prevention: Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of two interventions. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 219–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., & Turrisi, R. (2008). Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking: State of the evidence and steps toward public health impact. Pediatrics, 21, 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Guyll, M., & Shin, C. (2009a). Universal intervention as a protective shield against exposure to substance use: Long-term outcomes and public health significance. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2026–2033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Trudeau, L., Guyll, M., Shin, C., & Redmond, C. (2009b). Universal intervention effects on substance use among young adults mediated by delayed adolescent substance initiation. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 77, 620–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Trudeau, L., Guyll, M., & Shin, C. (2012). Benefits of universal intervention effects on a youth protective shield 10 years after baseline. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 414–417.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, Iowa.

  • Temple, M. T., Leigh, B. C., & Schafer, J. (1993). Unsafe sexual behavior and alcohol use at the event level: Results of a national survey. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 6, 393–401.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. (1999). Dangerous liaisons: Substance abuse and sex. NY: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L., Perry, C. L., Dudovitz, B., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Anstine, P. S., Komro, K. A., & Toomey, T. L. (1995). A home-based prevention program for sixth-grade alcohol use: Results from Project Northland. Journal of Primary Prevention, 16, 125–147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. D., Read, J. P., Mitchell, R. E., & Brand, N. H. (2004). Do parents still matter? Parent and peer influences on alcohol involvement among recent high school graduates. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 18, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 219–240). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarber, W. L., Milhausen, R. R., Huang, B., & Crosby, R. A. (2008). Do rural and non-rural single, young adults differ in their risk and protective HIV/STD behaviors: Results from a national survey. The Health Education Monograph Series, 25, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Spoth.

Additional information

Work on this paper was supported by research grants DA007029 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and by grant AA014702-13 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spoth, R., Clair, S. & Trudeau, L. Universal Family-Focused Intervention with Young Adolescents: Effects on Health-Risking Sexual Behaviors and STDs Among Young Adults. Prev Sci 15 (Suppl 1), 47–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0321-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0321-2

Keywords

Navigation