Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Risk Assessment to Predict Recurrent Maltreatment: A Classification and Regression Tree Analysis (CART)

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has suggested that recurrent maltreatment may be best predicted by a combination of factors that vary across families. The present study set out to determine whether a pattern-centered analytic approach would better predict families at high risk for recurrence when compared to logistic regression methods. Archival data from substantiated investigations during 2003 were collected from a Connecticut Department of Children and Families county branch. Families (n = 244) with a substantiated index case were followed for 18 months to identify the presence of additional substantiated cases within the CPS system. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analyses revealed that prior CPS involvement was the best predictor of recurrent maltreatment. Further, risk items that were associated with recurrence were different for families with and without previous CPS investigations. Families with only prior unsubstantiated CPS investigations and poor child visibility within the community were at high risk for recurrence. Families without prior CPS involvement that were not actively involved in case planning and had a history of domestic violence were at high risk for recurrence. These findings suggest that pattern-centered analyses may be a useful approach to informing site-specific predictors of maltreatment recurrence by creating clear decision points that delineate high risk subgroups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, C. (1988). Development of risk assessment indices for the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. In T. Tatara (Ed.), Validation research in CPS risk assessment: Three recent studies (Vol. Occasional Monograph Series No. 2). Washington, DC: American Public Welfare Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, C., & Wagner, D. (2000). The relative validity of actuarial- and consensus-based risk assessment systems. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, M. E. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered approaches in the study of developmental courses and transitions in alcohol use: Introduction to the special section. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 878–881.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. (1993). Etiology of child maltreatment: A developmental-ecological analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 413–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Ohlsen, R. A., and Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belmont: Wadsworth International Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, D., & Webster, D. (1999). Child welfare in the United States: Policy, practice and innovations in service delivery. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8, 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. W., & Hollander, M. (1977). Statistics: A biomedical introduction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camasso, M. J., & Jagannathan, R. (1995). Prediction accuracy of the Washington and Illinois risk assessment instruments: An application of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Social Work Research, 19, 174–183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, S. J. (2001). Risk assessment in child welfare: The art and science. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1995). A developmental psychopathology perspective on child abuse and neglect (Special Article). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 541–565.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DePanfilis, D., & Zuravin, S. J. (1998). Rates, patterns, and frequency of child maltreatment recurrences among families known to CPS. Child Maltreatment, 3, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePanfilis, D., & Zuravin, S. J. (1999). Epidemiology of child maltreatment recurrences. Social Service Review, 73, 218–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, D. J., Marshall, D. B., & Orme, M. (1999). Characteristics of repeated referrals to child protective services in Washington State. Child Maltreatment, 4, 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluke, J. D., Shusterman, G. R., Hollinshead, D., & Yuan, Y. (2005). Rereporting and recurrence of child maltreatment: Findings from NCANDS. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluke, J. D., Yuan, Y.-Y. T., & Edwards, M. (1999). Recurrence of maltreatment: An application of the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS). Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 633–650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G. E., & Miyoshi, T. J. (1994). A survival analysis of the revictimization of children: The case of Colorado. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 1063–1071.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T. L., Wells, S. J., & Cotton, E. E. (2001). Predictors of maltreatment recurrence at two milestones in the life of a case. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E., & Shlonsky, A. (2000). Risk assessment in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 813–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1977). The human ecology of child maltreatment: A conceptual model for research. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 39, 721–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. E., & Browne, K. D. (1999). Recurrent maltreatment during childhood: A survey of referrals to police child protection units in England. Child Maltreatment 4, 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, D. J., & McCabe, M. P. (2000). Multi-type maltreatment and the long-term adjustment of adults. Child Abuse Review, 9, 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, D. J., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Multiple forms of child abuse and neglect: Adult retrospective reports. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 547–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindley, N., Ramchandani, P. G., & Jones, D. P. (2006). Risk factors for recurrence of maltreatment: A systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91, 744–752.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howing, P. T., Wodarski, J. S., Kurtz, P., & Gaudin, J. M. (1989). Methodological issues in child maltreatment research. Social Work Research & Abstracts 25, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, M., & Halfon, N. (1997). Recidivism in child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review, 19, 139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R., & Camasso, M. J. (1996). Risk assessment in child protective services: A canonical analysis of the case management function. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20, 599–612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. A., Brown, C. H., & Wells, S. J. (2002). Using classification and regression tress (CART) to support worker decision making. Social Work Research, 26, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., & L’Esperance, J. (1984). Predicting the recurrence of child abuse. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 20, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Trocme, N. (2005). Reviewing the evidence on assessing risk for child abuse and neglect. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 5, 310–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, H. C. (1992). Evaluating medical tests. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. S., Leeb, R. T., English, D., Graham, J., Briggs, E. C., Brody, K. E., et al. (2005). What’s in a name? A comparison of methods for classifying predominant type of maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 533–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, S. C., Roy, J., Clark, M. A., Friedmann, P. D., & Rakowski, W. (2003). Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: Methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 172–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H. B., Markovic, J., Chaudhry, U., Ahart, S., & Torres, H. (1995). Reabuse rates in a sample of children followed for 5 years after discharge from a child abuse inpatient assessment program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 1363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J. (2000). An introduction to classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, CA.

  • Lipien, L., & Forthofer, M. S. (2004). An event history analysis of recurrent child maltreatment reports in Florida. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litrownik, A. J., Lau, A., English, D. J., Briggs, E., Newton, R. R., Romney, S., et al. (2005). Measuring the severity of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 553–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, P., Doueck, H. J., & Wodarski, J. S. (1996). Risk assessment for child protective services: A review of the empirical literature on instrument performance. Social Work Research 20, 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J., & McDonald, T. (1989). Predicting recurrence of maltreatment. Risk assessment in child protective services (vol. 4). National Child Welfare Resource Center for Management and Administration.

  • Marshall, D. B., & English, D. J. (1999). Survival analysis of risk factors for recidivism in child abuse and neglect. Child Maltreatment, 4, 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, T., & Marks, J. (1991). A review of risk factors assessed in child protective services. Social Service Review, 65, 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy-Berman, V. (1994). A conceptual framework for thinking about risk assessment and case management in child protective service. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 193–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1993). Panel on research on child abuse and neglect. Understanding child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecora, P. J. (1991). Investigating allegations of child maltreatment: The strengths and limitations of current risk assessment systems. Child & Youth Services, 15, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittner, B. (2002). The use of risk assessment instruments in child protective services case planning and closures. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rycus, J. S., & Hughes, R. C. (2003). Issues in risk assessment in child protective services: Policy white paper. Columbus, OH: North American Resource Center for Child Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, C. (2004). Re-visioning risk assessment for human service decision making. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, A., & Wagner, D. (2005). The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, D., & Colla, P. (1997). CART–Classification and regression trees. San Diego, CA: Salford Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services (2003). National study of child protective services systems and reform efforts: Review of State CPS Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, M. S., & Woolverton, M. (1990). Risk assessment: The emperor’s new clothes? Child Welfare, 69, 483–511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, J., Torti, T., & Zunder, P. (1988). Vermont division of social services family risk assessment matrix: Research and evaluation. In T. Tatara (Ed.), Validation Research in CPS Risk Assessment: Three Recent Studies. (Occational Monograph Series No.2). Washington D.C.: American Public Welfare Association.

  • Wolock, I., Sherman, P., Feldman, L. H., & Metzger, B. (2001). Child abuse and neglect referral patterns: A longitudinal study. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. M. (1997). Risk predictors for re-abuse or re-neglect in a predominantly Hispanic population. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Ellen Burgess and all of the DCF case workers for their support of the project. Further, we would like to thank Nick Perrine, Gretchen Kishbauch, and the entire Wesleyan research team for their assistance in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eve M. Sledjeski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sledjeski, E.M., Dierker, L.C., Brigham, R. et al. The Use of Risk Assessment to Predict Recurrent Maltreatment: A Classification and Regression Tree Analysis (CART). Prev Sci 9, 28–37 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0079-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0079-0

Keywords

Navigation