Abstract
Boys consistently report higher rates of serious offending during late adolescence than do girls, yet research is mixed regarding the ways in which males and females may differentially experience risk and protection in their families, schools, peer groups, and as individuals. This article examines gender differences in 22 psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with serious delinquency. Based on self-reported information from 7,829 10th-grade students completing the Communities That Care Youth Survey, all psychosocial factors were significantly related to serious delinquency for both sexes. For 12 of the 22 factors, the strength of the association was significantly greater for males, and, for 18 factors, boys reported higher levels of risk exposure and lower levels of protection than did girls. Together, these findings suggest that boys’ greater involvement in serious delinquency is due to the combination of experiencing more risk and less protection than girls and the greater association of these predictors with serious delinquency for boys compared to girls. Implications for prevention programming are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Data from 10th graders was available from only 40 of the 41 communities in 2002.
References
Arnold, R. A. (1990). Processes of victimization and criminalization of black women. Social Justice, 17, 153–166.
Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni Jr., A. J. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.
Belknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and criminal justice (2nd edn.). Cincinnati, OH: Wadsworth.
Blitstein, J. L., Murray, D. M., Lytle, L. A., Birnbaum, A. S., & Perry, C. L. (2005). Predictors of violent behavior in an early adolescent cohort: Similarities and differences across genders. Health Education and Behavior, 32, 175–194.
Blum, J., Ireland, M., & Blum, R. W. (2003). Gender differences in youth violence: A report from Add Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 234–240.
Bottcher, J. (1995). Gender as social control: A qualitative study of incarcerated youths and their siblings in greater Sacramento. Justice Quarterly, 12, 33–57.
Canter, R. J. (1982). Family correlates of male and female delinquency. Criminology, 20, 149–167.
Cernkovich, S., & Giordano, P. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25, 295–319.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497–535.
Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination-The American Society of Criminology 1993 Presidential Address. Criminology, 32, 1–21.
Fagan, A. A. (2001). The gendered cycle of violence: Comparing the effects of child abuse and neglect on criminal offending for males and females. Violence and Victims, 16, 457–474.
Farrington, D. P., & Painter, K. A. (2003). Gender differences in offending: implications for risk-focused prevention. London: Home Office RDA Online Report OLR09/04.
Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2002). Male and female offending trajectories. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 159–177.
Glaser, R. R., Van Horn, M. L., Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2005). Measurement properties of the Communities That Care Youth Survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 73–102.
Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 87–114). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Greenfeld, L. A., & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Communities That Care prevention strategies guide. South Deerfield, MA: Channing Bete.
Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., & Harachi, T. W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders (pp. 106–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., et al. (2000). Predictors of youth violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Heimer, K. (1995). Gender, race, and the pathways to delinquency: an interactionist perspective. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 140–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Liu, X., & Kaplan, H. B. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in adolescent delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of mediating mechanisms. Criminology, 37, 195–215.
Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: Vol. 7 (pp. 29–149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mazerolle, P. (1998). Gender, general strain, and delinquency: An empirical examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65–91.
Mears, D. P., Ploeger, M., & Warr, M. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 251–266.
Miller, J., & White, N. A. (2003). Gender and adolescent relationship violence: A contextual examination. Criminology, 41, 1207–1248.
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge Studies in Criminology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrica, 54, 557–585.
Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376–398.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus 3.1 (Version 3.1). Los Angeles.
Piquero, N. L., & Sealock, M. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew's Gender/GST hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 21, 125–158.
Resnick, M. D., Ireland, M., & Borowsky, I. (2004). Youth violence perpetration: What protects? What predicts? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 424.e421–424.e410.
Richie, B. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of Black battered women. New York: Routledge.
Rowe, D. C., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Flannery, D. J. (1995). Sex differences in crime: Do means and within-sex variation have similar causes? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 84–100.
Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140–172.
Snyder, H. N. (2003). Juvenile arrests 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.
Widom, C. S. (1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244, 160–166.
Wiebush, R. G., Baird, C., Kinsberg, B., & Onek, D. (1995). Risk assessment and classification for serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 171–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multiple group data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 219–240, 269–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by research grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA10768-01A1), and (R01 DA015183-01A1) with co-funding from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Child Health and Development, the National Institute on Mental Health, and the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology in Nashville, TN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fagan, A.A., Van Horn, M.L., Hawkins, J.D. et al. Gender Similarities and Differences in the Association Between Risk and Protective Factors and Self-Reported Serious Delinquency. Prev Sci 8, 115–124 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1