Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Similarities and Differences in the Association Between Risk and Protective Factors and Self-Reported Serious Delinquency

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Boys consistently report higher rates of serious offending during late adolescence than do girls, yet research is mixed regarding the ways in which males and females may differentially experience risk and protection in their families, schools, peer groups, and as individuals. This article examines gender differences in 22 psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with serious delinquency. Based on self-reported information from 7,829 10th-grade students completing the Communities That Care Youth Survey, all psychosocial factors were significantly related to serious delinquency for both sexes. For 12 of the 22 factors, the strength of the association was significantly greater for males, and, for 18 factors, boys reported higher levels of risk exposure and lower levels of protection than did girls. Together, these findings suggest that boys’ greater involvement in serious delinquency is due to the combination of experiencing more risk and less protection than girls and the greater association of these predictors with serious delinquency for boys compared to girls. Implications for prevention programming are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data from 10th graders was available from only 40 of the 41 communities in 2002.

References

  • Arnold, R. A. (1990). Processes of victimization and criminalization of black women. Social Justice, 17, 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni Jr., A. J. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and criminal justice (2nd edn.). Cincinnati, OH: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitstein, J. L., Murray, D. M., Lytle, L. A., Birnbaum, A. S., & Perry, C. L. (2005). Predictors of violent behavior in an early adolescent cohort: Similarities and differences across genders. Health Education and Behavior, 32, 175–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, J., Ireland, M., & Blum, R. W. (2003). Gender differences in youth violence: A report from Add Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 234–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bottcher, J. (1995). Gender as social control: A qualitative study of incarcerated youths and their siblings in greater Sacramento. Justice Quarterly, 12, 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter, R. J. (1982). Family correlates of male and female delinquency. Criminology, 20, 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cernkovich, S., & Giordano, P. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25, 295–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination-The American Society of Criminology 1993 Presidential Address. Criminology, 32, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, A. A. (2001). The gendered cycle of violence: Comparing the effects of child abuse and neglect on criminal offending for males and females. Violence and Victims, 16, 457–474.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & Painter, K. A. (2003). Gender differences in offending: implications for risk-focused prevention. London: Home Office RDA Online Report OLR09/04.

  • Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2002). Male and female offending trajectories. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 159–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. R., Van Horn, M. L., Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2005). Measurement properties of the Communities That Care Youth Survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 73–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 87–114). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, L. A., & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Communities That Care prevention strategies guide. South Deerfield, MA: Channing Bete.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., & Harachi, T. W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders (pp. 106–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., et al. (2000). Predictors of youth violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, K. (1995). Gender, race, and the pathways to delinquency: an interactionist perspective. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 140–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Kaplan, H. B. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in adolescent delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of mediating mechanisms. Criminology, 37, 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: Vol. 7 (pp. 29–149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, P. (1998). Gender, general strain, and delinquency: An empirical examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P., Ploeger, M., & Warr, M. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., & White, N. A. (2003). Gender and adolescent relationship violence: A contextual examination. Criminology, 41, 1207–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge Studies in Criminology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrica, 54, 557–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus 3.1 (Version 3.1). Los Angeles.

  • Piquero, N. L., & Sealock, M. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew's Gender/GST hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 21, 125–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. D., Ireland, M., & Borowsky, I. (2004). Youth violence perpetration: What protects? What predicts? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 424.e421–424.e410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richie, B. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of Black battered women. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. C., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Flannery, D. J. (1995). Sex differences in crime: Do means and within-sex variation have similar causes? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N. (2003). Juvenile arrests 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widom, C. S. (1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244, 160–166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebush, R. G., Baird, C., Kinsberg, B., & Onek, D. (1995). Risk assessment and classification for serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 171–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multiple group data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 219–240, 269–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA10768-01A1), and (R01 DA015183-01A1) with co-funding from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Child Health and Development, the National Institute on Mental Health, and the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology in Nashville, TN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abigail A. Fagan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagan, A.A., Van Horn, M.L., Hawkins, J.D. et al. Gender Similarities and Differences in the Association Between Risk and Protective Factors and Self-Reported Serious Delinquency. Prev Sci 8, 115–124 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1

Keywords

Navigation