Abstract
Academic interest in official systems of racial and ethnic classification has grown in recent years, but most research on such census categories has been limited to small case studies or regional surveys. In contrast, this article analyzes a uniquely global data set compiled by the United Nations Statistical Division to survey the approaches to ethnic enumeration taken in 141 countries. The motives for this analysis combine theoretical, applied, and policy objectives. I find that 63% of the national censuses studied incorporate some form of ethnic enumeration, but their question and answer formats vary along several dimensions that betray diverse conceptualizations of ethnicity (for example, as “race” or “nationality”). Moreover, these formats follow notably regional patterns. Nonetheless, the variety of approaches can be grouped into a basic taxonomy of ethnic classification approaches, suggesting greater commonality in worldwide manifestations of the ethnicity concept than some have recognized.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Kertzer and Arel (2002b) note, however, that even culturalist interpretations of ethnicity can take on an essentialist, almost biological quality, as in 19th-century depictions of culture as physically inheritable, e.g., “in the blood.” For descriptions of contemporary forms of cultural essentialism, see Balibar and Wallerstein (1991) and Taguieff (1991).
The only other nation to suggest such a distinction is Zambia, whose census instructs, “If Zambian enter ethnic grouping, if not mark major racial group.” But by combining the two terms in one question, this formulation departs from the U.S. presumption that the same individual must be classified simultaneously along two different dimensions of identity: an “ethnic” one and a “racial” one.
This emphasis on phenotype is found on only one other census in this sample, that of another former Portuguese colony: Mozambique. Mozambique’s census asks for “tipo somático/origem” and features response categories similar to Brazil’s (Negro; Misto; Branco; Indiano; Outro).
The census questionnaire for El Salvador is missing, and Cuba and Germany did not conduct censuses in the 2000 round (Germany maintains a population register instead).
Note that the American Anthropological Association (1997) has also recommended that the term “ethnicity” replace “race” in federal classification, for the same reason.
References
Alba, R. (1990). Ethnic identity: The transformation of white America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Almey, M., Pryor, E. T., & White, P. M. (1992). National census measures of ethnicity in the Americas. Conference on the Peopling of the Americas, Vera Cruz, Mexico, May 23: International Union for the Scientific Study of Populations.
American Anthropological Association (1997). Response to OMB Directive 15: Race and ethnic standards for federal statistics and administrative reporting. September. Retrieved from: http://www.aaanet.org/gvt/ombdraft.htm. Accessed 27 February 2006.
American Sociological Association (2002). Statement of the American Sociological Association on the importance of collecting data and doing social scientific research on race. Adopted by the elected Council of the American Sociological Association, August 9. Retrieved from: http://www.asanet.org/media/racestmt02.pdf. Accessed 27 February 27 2006.
Anderson, M. J. (1988). The American census: A social history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Balibar, E., & Wallerstein, I. (1991). Race, nation, class: Ambiguous identities. London, England and New York: Verso.
Banton, M. (1983). Chapter 3: Changing conceptions of race. In Racial and ethnic competition (pp. 32–59). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Bean, F. D., & Tienda, M. (1987). The Hispanic population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage.
Blum, A. (2002). Resistance to identity categorization in France. In D. I. Kertzer & D. Arel (Eds.), Census and identity: The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses (pp. 121–147). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Blum, A., & Gousseff, C. (1996). Statistiques Ethniques et Nationales dans l’Empire Russe et en URSS. In J. L. Rallu & Y. Courbage (Eds.), Démographie et Ethnicité. Paris, France: INED.
Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the new Europe. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
del Pinal, J., & Ennis, S. (2005). The racial and ethnic identity of Latin American immigrants in Census 2000. Annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Philadelphia, PA, March 31–April 2.
Eberhardt, P. (2003). Ethnic groups and population changes in twentieth-century central-eastern Europe: History, data, and analysis. Armonk, NY and London, England: M.E. Sharpe.
Fenton, S. (2003). Ethnicity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Fredrickson, G. M. (2002). Racism: A short history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gans, H. (1979). Symbolic ethnicity: The future of ethnic groups and cultures in America. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2(1), 1–19.
Goldberg, D. T. (2002). The racial state. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hannaford, I. (1996). Race: The history of an idea in the West. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Hollinger, D. A. (1998). National culture and communities of descent. Reviews in American History, 26(1), 312–328.
Jenkins, R. (1997). Rethinking ethnicity: Arguments and explorations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jewell, E. J., & Abate, F. (Eds.) (2001). The new Oxford American dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kertzer, D. I., & Arel, D. (Eds.) (2002a). Census and identity: The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kertzer, D. I., & Arel, D. (2002b). Censuses, identity formation, and the struggle for political power. In D. I. Kertzer & D. Arel (Eds.), Census and identity: The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses (pp. 1–42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, S. M. (1993). Racial classifications in the U.S. Census: 1890–1990. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16(1), 75–94.
Malone, N., Baluja, K. F., Costanzo, J. M., & Davis, C. J. (2003). The foreign-born population: 2000. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Census 2000 Brief CENBR/01-1, C2KBR-34.
Marx, A. W. (1998). Making race and nation: A comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Morning, A. (2003). New faces, old faces: Counting the multiracial population past and present. In H. DeBose & L. Winters (Eds.), New faces in a changing America: Multiracial identity in the 21st century (pp. 41–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morning, A., & Sabbagh, D. (2005). From sword to plowshare: Using race for discrimination and antidiscrimination in the United States. International Social Science Journal, 57(183), 57–73.
Nobles, M. (2000). Shades of citizenship: Race and the census in modern politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Office of Management and Budget (1997). Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity. Retrieved from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/ombdir15.html. Accessed 27 February 27 2006.
Omi, M. A. (2001). The changing meaning of race. In N. J. Smelser, W. J. Wilson, & F. Mitchell (Eds.), America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences (pp. 243–263). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Prewitt, K. (2005). Racial classification in America: Where do we go from here? Daedalus, 134(1), 5–17.
Rallu, J.-L., Piché, V., & Simon, P. (2004). Démographie et Ethnicité: Une Relation Ambiguë. In G. Caselli, J. Vallin, & G. Wunsch (Eds.), Démographie: Analyse et Synthèse (pp. 481–515). Paris, France: Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques.
Rodríguez, C. E. (2000). Changing race: Latinos, the census, and the history of ethnicity in the United States. New York: New York University Press.
Simon, P., & Stavo-Debauge, J. (2004). Les Politiques Anti-Discrimination et les Statistiques: Paramètres d’une Incohérence. Sociétés Contemporaines, 53, 57–84.
Skerry, P. (2000). Counting on the census? Race, group identity, and the evasion of politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Smelser, N. J., Wilson, W. J., & Mitchell, F. (Eds.) (2001). America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Statistics Canada, U.S. Census Bureau (1993). Challenges of measuring an ethnic world: Science, politics, and reality. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Taguieff, P.-A. (1991). Les Métamorphoses Idéologiques du Racisme et la Crise de l’Antiracisme. In P.-A. Taguieff (Ed.), Face au Racisme (pp. 13–63). Paris, France: Éditions la Découverte.
Telles, E. E. (2004). Race in another America: The significance of skin color in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
United Nations Statistical Division (1998). Principles and recommendations for population and housing censuses. ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/67/Rev.1, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division.
United Nations Statistical Division (2003). Ethnicity: A review of data collection and dissemination. Unpublished document, Demographic and Social Statistics Branch, United Nations Statistical Division.
Wagley, C. (1965). On the concept of social race in the Americas. In D. B. Heath & R. N. Adams (Eds.), Contemporary cultures and societies in Latin America (pp. 531–545). New York: Random House.
Washington, S. L. (2005). Principles of racial taxonomy. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Princeton University.
Waters, M. (1990). Ethnic options: Choosing identities in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Waters, M. C. (1999). Black identities: West Indian immigrant dreams and American realities. New York and Cambridge, MA: Russell Sage Foundation and Harvard University Press.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wolfe, P. (2001). Land, labor, and difference: Elementary structures of race. The American Historical Review, 106(3), 866–905.
Zuberi, T. (2005). The limits of racial and ethnic data. Demographic and Social Statistics Branch Seminar, New York, June 9, United Nations Statistical Division.
Acknowledgments
The author warmly thanks the following people and institutions for their contributions: Kevin Deardorff (U.S. Census Bureau); United Nations Statistical Division (Department of Economic and Social Affairs), Demographic and Social Statistics Branch (particularly Mary Chamie, Jeremiah Banda, Yacob Zewoldi, Margaret Mbogoni, Lisa Morrison-Puckett, and intern Julia Alemany); International Programs Center, U.S. Census Bureau; Adrian Hayes (Australian National University); Caroline Persell and Sylvia Simson (New York University); Leslie Stone (Inter-American Development Bank); Gerald Haberkorn (Secretariat of the Pacific Community); Patrick Corr (Australian Bureau of Statistics); and anonymous reviewers. I also wish to thank the attendees at the following presentations of this research: U.S. Census Bureau Migration Speaker Series; Population Association of America; International Union for the Scientific Study of Population; American Sociological Association; and the Demographic and Social Statistics Branch (United Nations) Speaker Series. The initial version of this research was funded by the U.S. Census Bureau Immigration Statistics Branch. However, the conclusions—and the shortcomings—are solely those of the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morning, A. Ethnic Classification in Global Perspective: A Cross-National Survey of the 2000 Census Round. Popul Res Policy Rev 27, 239–272 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-007-9062-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-007-9062-5