Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

First use of patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) measures in adults with neurofibromatosis

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) provides clinicians and researchers access to reliable, validated measures of physical, mental, and social well-being. The use of PROMIS can facilitate comparisons among clinical subpopulations and with the U.S. general population. We report on the first study using PROMIS measures in patients with neurofibromatosis (NF). Eighty-six adult patients (mean age = 44; 55% female; 87% white; 50% NF1, 41% NF2 and 9% schwannomatosis) completed a battery of PROMIS computerized adaptive tests (CATs). Across all PROMIS instruments, mean scores for each CAT were between 48.97 and 52.60, which is within ±0.5 SD of the U.S. general population norms. However, scores were distributed across a broad range for each PROMIS measure (±3 SDs). Clinically meaningful scores (defined >1 SD impairment) were observed in 20% (pain interference), 17% (pain behavior), 16% (physical function), 16% (anxiety), 16% (depression), 15% (satisfaction with social roles), 13% (fatigue), 6% (anger), and 5% (satisfaction with discretionary social activities) of the sample. All PROMIS measures were highly interrelated in bivariate analysis (P ≤ .001). There were no differences in PROMIS scores by disease type (NF1, NF2 and schwannomatosis), or self reported learning disabilities, or compared with the US population. Scores suggest a broad continuum of symptoms and functioning in patients with NF that is not affected by NF type, as well as interrelation among the physical and psychosocial domains as measured by PROMIS. PROMIS measures may be useful in clinical practice to monitor changes in symptoms and functioning over time, as well as in clinical trials to determine patient reported changes during drug and psychosocial clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolters PL, Martin S, Merker VL et al (2016) Patient-reported outcomes of pain and physical functioning in neurofibromatosis clinical trials. Neurology 87(7 Suppl 1):S4–S12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferner RE, Shaw A, Evans DG et al (2014) Longitudinal evaluation of quality of life in 288 patients with neurofibromatosis 2. J Neurol 261(5):963–969

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cosetti MK, Golfinos JG, Roland JT Jr. (2015) Quality of life (QoL) assessment in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 153(4):599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neary WJ, Hillier VF, Flute T, Stephens D, Ramsden RT, Evans DG (2010) Use of a closed set questionnaire to measure primary and secondary effects of neurofibromatosis type 2. J Laryngol Otol 124(7):720–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolkenstein P, Zeller J, Revuz J, Ecosse E, Leplege A (2001) Quality-of-life impairment in neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study of 128 cases. Arch Dermatol 137(11):1421–1425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Page PZ, Page GP, Ecosse E, Korf BR, Leplege A, Wolkenstein P (2006) Impact of neurofibromatosis 1 on quality of life: a cross-sectional study of 176 American cases. Am J Med Genet A 140A:1893–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Merker VL, Bredella MA, Cai W et al (2014) Relationship between whole-body tumor burden, clinical phenotype, and quality of life in patients with neurofibromatosis. Am J Med Genet A 164(6):1431–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vranceanu AM, Merker VL, Park E, Plotkin SR (2013) Quality of life among adult patients with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2 and schwannomatosis: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurooncol 114(3):257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang DL, Smith KB, Esparza S et al (2012) Emotional functioning of patients with neurofibromatosis tumor suppressor syndrome. Genet Med 14(12):977–982

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vranceanu AM, Merker VL, Plotkin SR, Park ER (2014) The relaxation response resiliency program (3RP) in patients with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, and schwannomatosis: results from a pilot study. J Neurooncol 120(1):103–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cella D, Chang CH (2000) A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med Care 38(9 Suppl):II66–II72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al (2007) The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first 2 years. Med Care 45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Cella D, Gershon R et al (2010) Representativeness of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system internet panel. J Clin Epidemiol 63(11):1169–1178

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D (2005) The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(5 Suppl 39):S53–S57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fries JF, Cella D, Rose M, Krishnan E, Bruce B (2009) Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. J Rheumatol 36(9):2061–2066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz CE, Bode R, Repucci N, Becker J, Sprangers MA, Fayers PM (2006) The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift. Qual Life Res 15(9):1533–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mautner VF, Granstrom S, Leark RA (2012) Impact of ADHD in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1: associated psychological and social problems. J Atten Disord 19(1):35–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pride NA, Crawford H, Payne JM, North KN (2013) Social functioning in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. Res Dev Disabil 34(10):3393–3399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The funding was provided by National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Defense and Children’s Tumor Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana-Maria Vranceanu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Mojtaba Talaei-Khoei, Eric Riklin, Monica R. Sheridan and Justin T. Jordan report no disclosures. Vanessa L. Merker receives research support from the Program in Cancer Outcomes Research Training (NCIR25CA92203) and a Young Investigator Award from the Children’s Tumor Foundation. Scott R. Plotkin receives research support from the Children’s Tumor Foundation, NIH, and Department of Defense Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials Consortium. Ana-Maria Vranceanu receives research support from the Children’s Tumor Foundation.

Additional information

Scott R. Plotkin and Ana-Maria Vranceanu have contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talaei-Khoei, M., Riklin, E., Merker, V.L. et al. First use of patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) measures in adults with neurofibromatosis. J Neurooncol 131, 413–419 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2314-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2314-7

Keywords

Navigation