Skip to main content
Log in

Self-control motivationally reconsidered: “Acting” self-controlled is different to “being good” at self-control

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-control is typically conceptualized as an inherent human skill, focusing on the imperative control of thoughts, feelings, and behavior. In the present research, we scrutinize this understanding by differentiating between an ability self-concept of self-control strength and experiential acts of self-control. Moreover, by taking a motivational perspective, we analyze how much of a role intrapsychic conflict plays in both conceptions of self-control, and with regard to psychological well-being. In cross-sectional Study 1 (N = 228), we compared a typicality measure of experiential acts of imperative self-control with the widely used Self-Control Scale (Tangney et al. in J Pers 72:271–322, 2004). Findings confirm that “being good” at self-control does not correspond to “acting” self-controlled, and that both measures show opposing relationships to intrapsychic conflict, as well as to well-being. In Study 2 (N = 114), we corroborated these findings by using an experience-sampling approach. Multilevel analyses showed that between-person differences (Level 2) in self-control strength were generally unrelated to experiential acts of self-control in everyday life. By contrast, we found a positive Level 2 effect for acting self-controlled. With regard to momentary affect, both between- and within differences (Level 1) in acting self-controlled served as substantial predictors, in addition to momentary self-determination. Other context-dependent effects (i.e., studying vs. leisure time) further emphasize the need to consider motivational interpretations of self-control (strength).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Following a reviewer comment, we repeated the analysis presented in Model 4 with each of the separate reasons for engagement instead of the joint self-determination score. We found that extrinsic (estimate = 0.05, SE = 0.03, p = 0.09, 95% CI [− 0.008, 0.10]) and introjected reasons (estimate = 0.04, SE = 0.02, p = 0.075, 95% CI [− 0.005, 0.09]) related positively to acting self-controlled, whereas identified (estimate = − 0.15, SE = 0.02, p < 0.001, 95% CI [− 0.19, − 0.11]) and intrinsic reasons (estimate = − 0.56, SE = 0.03, p < 0.001, 95% CI [− 0.61, − 0.51]) related negatively to acting self-controlled. All other major findings remained fairly unaffected in these separate analyses. However, given that some of these indicators were closely related to each other, the interpretation of the joint self-determination score is probably more substantial.

References

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, M., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012344.34008.5c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrams, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2009). Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität: Eine deutsche Adaptation der Kurzform der Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D) [Measuring dispositional self-control capacity. A German adaptation of the short form of the Self-Control Scale]. Diagnostica, 55, 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. C., Kofler, L. M., Forster, D. E., & McCullough, M. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 796–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edn.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ridder, D., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C. F., Stok, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 76–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Ridder, D. T. D., de Boer, B. J., Lugtig, P., Bakker, A. B., & van Hooft, E. A. J. (2011). Not doing bad things is not equivalent to doing the right thing: Distinguishing between inhibitory and initiatory self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1006–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and the “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Tsukayama, E., & Kirby, T. A. (2013). Is it really self-control? Examining the predictive power of the delay of gratification task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213482589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C., & Rummel, J. (2016). I want to keep on exercising but I don’t: The negative impact of momentary lacks of self-control on exercise adherence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 26, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbach, A., & Shah, J. Y. (2006). Self-control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 820–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fries, S., Dietz, F., & Schmid, S. (2008). Motivational interference in learning: The impact of leisure alternatives on subsequent self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries, S., Schmid, S., Dietz, F., & Hofer, M. (2005). Conflicting values and their impact on learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries, S., Schmid, S., & Hofer, M. (2007). On the relationship between value orientation, valences, and academic achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, M., & Hofmann, W. (2016). State mindfulness, self-regulation, and emotional experience in everyday life. Motivation Science, 2, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, K. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galla, B. M., & Duckworth, A. L. (2015). More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galla, B. M., & Wood, J. J. (2015). Trait self-control predicts adolescents’ exposure and reactivity to daily stressful events. Journal of Personality, 83, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, A., Brassler, N. K., & Fries, S. (2014). Torn between study and leisure: How motivational conflicts relate to students’ academic and social adaptation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, A., & Fries, S. (2012). Motivational interference in study-leisure conflicts: How opportunity costs affect the self-regulation of university students. Educational Psychology, 32, 589–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, A., & Fries, S. (2014). Study and leisure interference as mediators between students’ self-control capacities and their domain-specific functioning and general well-being. Learning and Instruction, 31, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, A., & Fries, S. (2018). Understanding procrastination: A motivational approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, A., Fries, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2018). Know your preferences: Self-regulation as need-congruent goal selection. Review of General Psychology.

  • Grund, A., Grunschel, C., Bruhn, D., & Fries, S. (2015). Torn between want and should: An experience-sampling study on motivational conflict, well-being, self-control, and mindfulness. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, A., Schmid, S., & Fries, S. (2015). Studying against your will: Motivational interference in action. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, A., & Senker, K. (2018). Motivational foundations of self-control and mindfulness and their role in studyleisure conflicts. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, M., Kuhnle, C., Kilian, B., & Fries, S. (2012). Cognitive ability and personality variables as predictors of school grades and test scores in adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 22, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, M., Schmid, S., Fries, S., Dietz, F., Clausen, M., & Reinders, H. (2007). Individual values, motivational conflicts, and learning for school. Learning and Instruction, 17, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study on desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., & Patel, P. V. (2015). SurveySignal: A convenient solution for experience sampling research using participants’ own smartphones. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314525117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Psychological Science, 7, 450–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, H. P., & Hofmann, W. (2015). On integrating the components of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 618–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615593382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS). [Investigations with a German version of the PANAS]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Alienation: Ignoring one’s preferences. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 375–390). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J., & Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The volitional components checklist. In J. Heckhausen & C. Dweck (Eds.), Life span perspectives on motivation and control (pp. 15–49). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle, C., Hofer, M., & Kilian, B. (2010). The relationship of value orientations, self-control, frequency of school–leisure conflicts, and life-balance in adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). What’s so great about self-control? Examining the importance of effortful self-control and temptation in predicting real-life depletion and goal attainment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616679237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milyavskaya, M., Inzlicht, M., Hope, N., & Koestner, R. (2015). Saying ‘No’ to temptation: ‘Want-to’ motivation improves self-regulation by reducing temptation rather than by increasing self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M. (2008). Autonomous self-control is less depleting. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M. (2010). Building self-control strength: Practicing self-control leads to improved self-control performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 465–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., & Slessareva, E. (2003). Mechanisms of self-control failure: Motivation and limited resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 894–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, R., & Ryan, R. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F., & Engeser, S. (2010). Motive training and motivational competence. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit Motives (pp. 510–548). Oxford: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, B., Milyavskaya, M., Etz, A., Randles, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018, January 19). Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function: A Bayesian analysis. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BXFSU.

  • Schallberger, U. (2005). Kurzskala zur Erfassung der positiven Aktivierung, negativen Aktivierung und Valenz in Experience Sampling Studien (PANAVA-KS) [Scales for assessing positive/negative activation and valence in experience sampling studies]. Research report. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://www.research-projects.uzh.ch/p6975.htm.

  • Senécal, C., Julien, E., & Guay, F. (2003). Role conflict and academic procrastination: A self-determination perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all goals are personal goals: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298245010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, K. (1997). Sequentielle und Imperative Konzepte des Willens [Sequential and imperative theories of volition]. Psychologische Beiträge, 39, 346–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8, 454–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U. (2004). Die temporalen Facetten der Lebenszufriedenheit: Eine deutsche Adaptation der Skala von Pavot, Diener und Suh (1998) [The temporal facet of life satisfaction]. Diagnostica, 50, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, F. (1987). Bildhafte Vorstellungen des Willens [Metaphoric conceptions of will]. In H. Heckhausen, P. M. Gollwitzer & F. Weinert (Eds.), Jenseits des Rubikon: Der Wille in den Humanwissenschaften (pp. 10–26). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a research grant of the Bielelder Nachwuchsfond, Bielefeld University, Germany, to Axel Grund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Grund.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 60 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grund, A., Carstens, CA. Self-control motivationally reconsidered: “Acting” self-controlled is different to “being good” at self-control. Motiv Emot 43, 63–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9721-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9721-3

Keywords

Navigation