Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental differences in children’s interpersonal emotion regulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research on interpersonal emotion regulation (ER) in childhood has been rather unsystematic, focusing mainly on children’s prosocial behaviour, and has been conducted in the absence of an integrative emotion theoretical framework. The present research relied on the interpersonal affect classification proposed by Niven et al. (Emotion, 9:498–509, 2009) to investigate children’s use of different interpersonal ER strategies. The study drew on two samples: 180 parents of children aged between 3 and 8 years reported about a situation where their child was able to change what another person was feeling in order to make them feel better. In addition, 126 children between 3- and 8-years old answered two questions about how they could improve others’ mood. Results from both samples showed age differences in children’s use of interpersonal ER strategies. As expected, ‘affective engagement’ (i.e., focusing on the person or the problem) and ‘cognitive engagement’ (i.e., appraising the situation from a different perspective) were mainly used by 7–8 years-old, whereas ‘attention’ (i.e., distracting and valuing) was most used by 3–4 and 5–6 years-old. ‘Humor’ (i.e., laughing with the target) remained stable across the different age groups. The present research provides more information about the developmental patterns for each specific interpersonal emotion regulation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, L. F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Eyssell, K. M. (1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilancia, S. D., & Rescorla, L. (2010). Stability of behavioural and emotional problems over 6 years in children ages 4 to 6 or 6 to 7 at time 1. Journal of Emotion and Behavioural disorders, 18, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blandon, A. Y., Calkins, S. D., Keane, S. P., & O’Brien, M. (2008). Individual differences in trajectories of emotion regulation processes: The effects of maternal depressive symptomatology and children’s physiological regulation. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1110–1123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R. (1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1578–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carthy, T., Horesh, N., Apter, A., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation in children with anxiety disorders. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coan, J. (2011). The social regulation of emotion. In J. Decety & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), Handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 614–623). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, S. A., Bassett, H. H., Mincic, M. M., Kalb, S. C., Way, E., Wyatt, T., & Segal, Y. (2012). Social-emotional learning profiles of preschoolers’ early school success: A person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 178–189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, K., & Zarbatany, L. (1996). Age differences in support processes in conversations between friends. Child Development, 67, 1360–1373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, D., Whalen, C. K., & Flowers, J. V. (1978). Verbal response styles of children and adolescents in a counseling analog setting: Effects of age, sex, and labeling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J. S. (2002). Humor: A coping strategy for pediatric patients. Pediatric Nursing, 28, 123–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfield, K. A. (2014). A construct divided: Prosocial behavior as helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701–708). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Karbon, M., & Murphy, B. C. (1996). Relations of school children’s comforting behavior to empathy-related reactions and shyness. Social Development, 5, 330–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Shepard, S. A., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B. C., & Guthrie, I. K. (1998). Shyness and children’s emotionality, regulation, and coping: Contemporaneous, longitudinal, and across-context relations. Child Development, 69, 767–790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, S. J., & Feldstein, S. W. (2007). Adolescent humor and its relationship to coping, defense strategies, psychological distress and well-being. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 37, 255–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C. W., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabes, R. A., Gaertner, B. M., & Popp, T. K. (2008). Getting along with others: social competence in early childhood. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of early childhood development. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farver, J. M., & Branstetter, W. H. (1994). Preschoolers’ prosocial responses to their peers’ distress. Developmental Psychology, 30, 334–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. H. (1993). Sex differences in emotionality: fact or stereotype? Feminism & Psychology, 3, 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski, N., Teerds, J., Kraaij, V., Legerstee, J., & Van Den Kommer, T. (2004). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms, differences between males and females. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, I., Matheson, K., & Mantler, J. (2006). The assessment of emotional intelligence: A comparison of performance-based and self-report methodologies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 33–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2007). Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, T. (2010). The development of emotion perception in face and voice during infancy. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 28, 219–236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L. (1991). The work of the imagination. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 283–304). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L., & Lipian, M. S. (1989). Understanding emotion and experiencing emotion. In C. Saarni & P. L. Harris (Eds.), Children’s understanding of emotion (pp. 241–258). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffner, C., & Haefner, M. J. (1997). Childrens comforting of frightened coviewers—Real and hypothetical television-viewing situations. Communication Research, 24, 136–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, B. R., Henrich, J., Brosnan, S. F., & Silk, J. B. (2012). The ontogeny of human prosociality: behavioral experiments with children aged 3 to 8. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. T., To, J. T., & Fireman, G. (2007). Children’s understanding and experience of mixed emotions. Psychological Science, 18, 186–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, L., Stein, N., & Liwag, M. (1999). Remember children’s emotions: Sources of concordant and discordant accounts between parents and children. Developmental Psychology, 35, 790–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, C., & Masters, J. C. (1985). The development of children’s strategies for the social control of emotion. Child Development, 56, 1214–1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McRae, K., Ochsner, K. N., Mauss, I. B., Gabrieli, J. J. D., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Gender differences in emotion regulation: An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Ayduk, O. (2004). Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (pp. 99–129). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezlek, J. B., & Derks, P. (2001). Use of humor as a coping mechanism, psychological adjustment, and social interaction. Humor, 14, 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, K., Macdonald, I., & Holman, D. (2012). You spin me right round: Cross-relationship variability in interpersonal emotion regulation. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 394.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, K., Totterdell, P., & Holman, D. (2009). A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies. Emotion, 9, 498–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, K., Totterdell, P., Stride, C. B., & Holman, D. (2011). Emotion regulation of others and self (EROS): The development and validation of a new individual difference measure. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 30, 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Aldao, A. (2011). Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 704–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payton, J. W., Wardlaw, D. M., Grazyk, P. A., Bloodworth, M. R., Tompsett, C. J., & Weissberg, R. P. (2000). Social and emotional learning: a framework for promoting mental health and reducing risk behaviours in children and youth. Journal of School Health, 70, 179–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, G. E. B. (2005). Young children’s prosocial and aggressive behaviors and their experiences of being targeted for similar behaviors by peers. Social Development, 14, 206–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons, F., & Harris, P. (2005). Longitudinal change and longitudinal stability of individual differences in children’s emotion understanding. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1158–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rholes, W. S., & Ruble, D. N. (1984). Children’s understanding of dispositional characteristics of others. Child Development, 55, 550–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–485). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, E. M. (1979). Social perspective-taking ability, cognitive complexity and listener-adapted communication in early and late adolescence. Communication Monographs, 46, 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67, 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roque, L., & Verissimo, M. (2011). Emotional context, maternal behavior, and emotion regulation. Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 617–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (2004). Children’s strategies and goals in response to help-giving and help-seeking tasks within a friendship. Child Development, 75, 745–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., Ziaie, H., & O’Boyle, C. G. (1992). Self-regulation and emotion in infancy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 55, 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarni, C. (1992). Children’s emotional-expressive behaviour as regulators of others’ happy and sad emotional states. New Directions in Child Development, 55, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarni, C., Campos, J. J., Camras, L. A., & Witherington, D. (2006). Emotional development: Action, communication and understanding. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional and personality development (pp. 226–299). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, M., & Petermann, F. (2013). Relating empathy and emotion regulation: Do deficits in empathy trigger emotion dysregulation? Social Neuroscience, 8, 101–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonds, J., Kieras, J. E., Rueda, M. R., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Effortful control, executive attention, and emotional regulation in 7–10-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 22, 474–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegge, H., Terwogt, M. M., Reijnjes, A. H. A., & Van Tijen, N. (2004). Children’s conception of the emotion process: consequences for emotion regulation. In I. Nyklicek, L. Temoshok, & A. Vingerhoets (Eds.), Emotional expression and health: Advances in theory, assessment and clinical applications (pp. 240–254). New York: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stifter, C. A., & Moyer, D. (1991). The regulation of positive affect: Gaze aversion activity during mother-infant interaction. Infant Behavior and Development, 14, 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strick, M., Holland, R. W., Van Baaren, R. B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2009). Finding comfort in a joke: Consolatory effects of humor through cognitive distraction. Emotion, 9, 574–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. In N. Fox (Ed.), The development of emotion regulation: Biological and behavioural considerations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (2–3, Serial 240).

  • Web, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 775–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, T. D. (1989). Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widen, S. C., & Russell, J. A. (2003). A closer look at preschoolers’ freely produced labels for facial expressions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 114–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13, 803–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belén López-Pérez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

The research conducted has obtained ethical approval from the authors’ institution and were in accordance to the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. It has been carried after obtaining informed consent from the participants.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 3.

Table 3 Classification of categories previously identified in the literature within the interpersonal affect classification model

Appendix 2

See Table 4.

Table 4 Example of responses coded in each category in sample 1

Appendix 3

See Table 5.

Table 5 Example of responses coded in each category for the general question and the concrete scenario in sample 2

Appendix 4

Analyses of interpersonal emotion regulation categories previously identified in the literature

For the categories previously identified in the developmental literature, we only conducted analyses for the categories ‘talking about problems’, ‘companionship’, ‘affective display’, and ‘use of comforting objects’ as the frequencies were higher than 5. For ‘talking about problems’ in sample 1, there was only a general effect of the category, χ2 = 1.06, df = 1, p = .98. Thus, there were no significant differences in the use of the strategy between 5–6 and 7–8-year olds (see Appendices E and F). We did not perform any analyses for Sample 2 as the frequencies were lower than 5 for at least two age groups. For ‘companionship’ (χ2 = .91, df = 1, p = .99) and ‘affective display’ (χ2 = .91, df = 1, p = .99), in sample 1, there was only a general effect of the category. In sample 2, there was also a main effect of the category for ‘companionship’ (χ2 = 1.08, df = 6, p = .98), affective display (χ2 = 1.12, df = 6, p = .92), and use of comforting objects (χ2 = 5.96, df = 6, p = .43). Thus, there were no significant differences in the use of the strategy for 3–4 and 5–6-year-olds (Appendix 5). However, in sample 1, for ‘use of comforting objects’ the hi-log-linear produced a final model of Use of comforting objects × Age (χ2 = 1.93, df = 4, p = .75). Thus, 3–4-year-olds used this strategy significantly more than 5–6-year-olds (Appendices E and F).

Overall, these results replicated previous findings. Whereas talking about problems was mainly used by older children, the use of comforting objects was mainly used by younger children, as previously found by McCoy and Masters (1985). Interestingly, although previous literature identified categories such as ‘talking about problems’, ‘optimism’, and ‘account’, according to the IAC model these categories may be classified at affective engagement if they entail only to engage with the target’s feelings or cognitive engagement if they aim to change the target’s mindset about the situation/problem. Thus, although previous categories may provide more fine-grained information the use of models such as the IAC may provide more information regarding the processes targeted by the strategy (i.e., expressive behaviour vs. cognition). Thus, rather than discarding previous categories, the recommendation should be considering different models when analysing children’s ER strategies.

Appendix 5

See Table 6.

Table 6 Frequencies for regulation strategies previously identified in the literature

Appendix 6

See Table 7.

Table 7 Results of log-linear analyses for regulation and regulation strategies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López-Pérez, B., Wilson, E.L., Dellaria, G. et al. Developmental differences in children’s interpersonal emotion regulation. Motiv Emot 40, 767–780 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9569-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9569-3

Keywords

Navigation