Skip to main content
Log in

Preferences for sadness when eliciting help: Instrumental motives in sadness regulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation tested whether people are more willing to experience and express sadness, the more useful they expect sadness to be. Building on assumptions about the function of sadness, we predicted that people would expect sadness to be more useful when eliciting help to prevent a loss (vs. not). In Study 1, we examined preferences for sadness and its expected usefulness when eliciting donations for the sake of preventing a loss (vs. not). In Study 2, participants expected to elicit help to prevent a loss (vs. attain a benefit). In both studies, participants expected sadness to be more useful and were more willing to experience and express sadness when eliciting help to prevent a loss (vs. other reasons). Furthermore, the more useful participants expected experiencing and expressing sadness to be, the more willing they were to experience and to express sadness, respectively. We discuss the implications for research on emotion regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All causes were presented in random order. The loss focused causes included a local homeless shelter, cancer research, a charity fundraiser, hurricane victims, and an impoverished child. The non-loss focused causes included a local art museum, deep sea research, National Public Radio Broadcasting, preservation of a historic site, a politician’s election campaign.

  2. In Study 1, some of the variables were not normally distributed. We therefore ran Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed-ranks tests and found the same pattern of results. Preferences for experiencing sadness remained significantly higher when eliciting donations to prevent losses (vs. non), z = 7.00, p < .001 and the expected usefulness of sadness was also higher in that context, z = 7.38, p < .001. The same pattern was obtained for the expression of sadness, (z = 6.92, p < .001, and, z = 7.57, p < .001, for preferences and expected usefulness, respectively).

References

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R. (1968). Grief: Its nature and significance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 721–748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camras, L. A., & Allison, K. (1989). Children’s and adults’ beliefs about emotion elicitation. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, K. & Clark, M. S. (1991). Anger increases perceived dominance and decreases likeability; sadness increases perceived dependency. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychology Association, Washington, DC.

  • Clark, M. S., & Taraban, C. B. (1991). Reactions to and willingness to express emotion in two types of relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1994). Distinguishing Functional from Dysfunctional Affective Responses. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 131–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. R. (1988). What do you do when you’re happy or blue?: Mood, expectancies, and behavioral interest. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 32, 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 271–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, A., DeLongis, D., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (1994). Emotions Are Functional, Most of the Time. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 112–122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. Emotions, personality, and psychotherapy. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1991). The psychology of emotions. New York, NY, US: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Gross, J. J. (1999). Functionalist accounts of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2, 320–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W. (1999). The intrapersonal functions of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, M. S. (1961). On sadness and grief in infancy and childhood. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16, 332–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P. (1974). Loss and change. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–485). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion. Special Issue: Appraisal and Beyond: The Issue of Cognitive Determinants of Emotion, 7, 233–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, M. (2009). What do people want to feel and why? Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, M., Chiu, C. Y., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Business or pleasure? Utilitarian versus hedonic considerations in emotion regulation. Emotion, 7, 546–554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, M., & Ford, B. Q. (2009). Choosing to be afraid: Preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit. Emotion, 9, 488–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, M., & Ford, B. Q. (2010). Instrumental emotion regulation in negotiations: Goals and the expected usefulness of emotions (in press).

  • Tamir, M., Mitchell, C., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation. Psychological Science, 19, 324–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Affect, imagery, consciousness: II. The negative affects. Oxford, England: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaalberg, R., Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2004). Relations between emotions, display rules, social motives, and facial behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joy Hackenbracht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hackenbracht, J., Tamir, M. Preferences for sadness when eliciting help: Instrumental motives in sadness regulation. Motiv Emot 34, 306–315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9180-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9180-y

Keywords

Navigation