Skip to main content
Log in

The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Approach motivation is the energization of behavior by, or the direction of behavior toward, positive stimuli (objects, events, possibilities), whereas avoidance motivation is the energization of behavior by, or the direction of behavior away from, negative stimuli (objects, events, possibilities). In this article, I provide a brief overview of this distinction between approach and avoidance motivation. In addition, I provide a brief overview of a model of motivation in which this approach-avoidance distinction plays an integral role—the hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. NY: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. (1960). Emotion and personality. NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. Advances in Social Cognition, 20–27.

  • Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925–945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1779/1879). Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, K. (1999). Pleasure, pain, desire, and dread: Hidden core processes of emotion. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.). Wellbeing: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 525–557). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J., & Bernston, G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, G. (1921). Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Cornell University. American Journal of Psychology, 32, 563–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. (in press). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666–679.

  • Davidson, R. J. (1993). Parsing affective space: Perspectives from neuropsychology and psychophysiology. Neuropsychology, 7, 464–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In P. Pintrich & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (vol. 10, pp. 143–179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Fryer, J. W. (in press). The goal concept in psychology. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivational science (pp. xxx–xxx). NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., Gable, S. L., & Mapes, R. R. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 378–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Mapes, R. R. (2005). Approach-avoidance motivation and self-concept evaluation. In A. Tesser, J. Wood, & D. Stapel (Eds.), On building, defending, and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 171–196). Washington, D.C.: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-determination Research (pp. 361–387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Reis, H. T. (2003). Attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 317–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 171–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1998). Avoidance personal goals and the personality-illness relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1282–1299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of chievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2004). The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 957–971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1915). Repression. In the standard edition of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XIV. London: Hogarth, 1957.

  • Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkin, D. V. (1995). Human factors in air traffic control. NY: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (vol. 2). NY: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. (1995). Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 209–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human Motivation. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougal, W. (1908). An introduction to social psychology. Boston: John W. Luce and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, O. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana

  • Schneirla, T. (1959). An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 1–42). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherington, C. A. (1906). The integrative actions of the nervous system. NY: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shizgal, P. (1999). On the neural computation of utility: Implications from studies of brain stimulation and reward. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 500–524). NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stellar, J. R., & Stellar, E. (1985). The neurobiology of motivation and reward. NY: Springer-Verlag.

  • Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2001). Delimiting and integrating the goal and motive constructs in achievement motivation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 3–21). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptions and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and sociobiology, 11, 375–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this article was supported by grant #2565 from the William T. Grant Foundation. Thanks to Ista Zahn for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Elliot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliot, A.J. The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation. Motiv Emot 30, 111–116 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7

Keywords

Navigation