Skip to main content
Log in

Is Disgust a Homogeneous Emotion?

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Many theoretical accounts consider disgust to be a unitary emotion, although others have challenged this notion. We predict that if core disgust and socio-moral disgust are different constructs, then their co-associated elicited emotions are likely to be different, and time as well as gender are likely to differentially affect their intensity (via a greater reliance of socio-moral disgust on cognitive appraisal). To test these predictions, participants were shown photographs of core and socio-moral disgust elicitors and asked to provide a wide ranging rating of their emotional response to each at 3 time points. Each elicitor generated a significantly different emotional response. Furthermore, the disgust response to core elicitors weakened over time whereas socio-moral responses intensified. Males and females showed similar levels of disgust to socio-moral elicitors, but females showed higher levels to core elicitors. Overall, the results suggest that a different emotional construct was activated by each type of elicitor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarado, N. (1998). A reconsideration of the structure of the emotion lexicon. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angyal, A. (1941). Disgust and related aversions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basinger, K. S., Gibbs, J. C., & Fuller, D. (1995). Context and the measurement of moral judgement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 537–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, I. C., & Friedman, B. H. (2004). Autonomic specificity of discrete emotion and dimensions of affective space: A multivariate approach. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 51, 143–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L. (1994). Why emotions vary in intensity. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotions: Fundamental questions (pp. 386–393). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., & Centerbar, D. B. (2004). Analyzing anger: How to make people mad. Emotion, 4, 139–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Druschel, B. A., & Scherman, M. F. (1999). Disgust sensitivity as a function of the Big Five and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 739–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Journal of Personal and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., Rozin, P., McCauley, C. R., & Imada, S. (1997). Body, psyche and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 107–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures—Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30, 261–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marzillier, S. L., & Davey, G. C. L. (2004). The emotional profiling of disgust-eliciting stimuli: Evidence for primary and complex disgusts. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. I. (1997). The anatomy of disgust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabi, R. L. (2002). The theoretical versus lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 695–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olatunji, B. O., Tolin, D. F., Huppert, J. D., & Lohr, J. M. (2005). The relation between fearfulness, disgust sensitivity and religious obsessions in a non clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 891–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M., & Dalgleish, T. (1997). Cognition and emotion: From order to disorder. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royzman, E. B., & Sabini, J. (2001). Something it takes to be an emotion: The interesting case of disgust. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (1993). Disgust. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 575–594). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (1999). Disgust: The body and the soul emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 429–445). London: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Lowery, L., & Ebert, R. (1994). Varieties of disgust faces and the structure of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 870–881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Millman, L., & Nemeroff, C. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 703–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J., Anthony, S. H., Schmeer, S., & Overton, P. G. (in press). Food-related contextual factors substantially modify the disgust response. Food Quality and Preference.

  • Tomkins, S. (1963). Affect, imagery, consciousness: Vol 2. The negative affects. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul G. Overton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simpson, J., Carter, S., Anthony, S.H. et al. Is Disgust a Homogeneous Emotion?. Motiv Emot 30, 31–41 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9005-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9005-1

KEY WORDS:

Navigation