Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of Two Mental Health Outcome Measures: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II and Lehman’s Quality of Life Interview

  • Published:
Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

This study presents data on the cultural adaptation to Latino populations of two outcome measures that respond to the need for developing comprehensive instruments for outcome assessments in minority populations. We examined the psychometric properties of outcome measures designed to assess impairment in functioning, and quality of life. Impairment in functioning was measured with the Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DASII) developed by the World Health Organization (1997) and quality of life was measured with A. F. Lehman’s (A. F. Lehman, 1983; A. F. Lehman, 1988) shortened Quality of Life Interview (QOLI). Spanish speaking consumers (N= 198) from Fresno (CA), San Antonio (TX) and San Juan (PR) participated in this study. They were recruited from both mental health outpatient clinics and primary care rural clinics. The WHO-DASII showed good to excellent internal consistency in all sites (α = .72 to .97) except for one subscale (Self-Care α = .47). Test–retest reliability estimates were mostly moderate to substantial (.57 to .83), again with one exception, the Self-Care subscale (.46). For the QOLI internal consistency ranged from .34 to .98 and test–retest reliability ranged from .40 to .86 across all sites. An initial validation strategy using both known-groups and concurrent validity produced promising evidence of the construct validity of both measures. The Spanish versions of the WHO-DASII and the QOLI lend support to the translation and adaptation process to which these instruments were subjected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre-Molina, M., & Molina, C. (1994). Latino populations: Who are they? In C. W. Molina & M. Aguirre-Molina (Eds.), Latino health in the US: A growing challenge. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. California: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attkisson, C., Cook, J., Karno, M., Lehman, A., McGlashan, T. H., Meltzer, H. Y., et al. (1991). Clinical services research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 18, 561–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M., Ribera, J., Rubio-Stipec, M., Canino, G., Shrout, P., Ramírez, R., et al. (2001). Test–retest reliability of the Spanish version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M., Woodbury-Fariña, M., Canino, G., & Rubio-Stipec, M. (1993). The Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) in Puerto Rico. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 17, 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canino, G., & Bravo, M. (1994). The adaptation and testing of diagnostic and outcome measures for cross-cultural research. International Review and Psychiatry, 6, 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canino, G., & Guarnaccia, P. (1997). Methodological challenges in the assessment of Hispanic children and adolescents. Applied Development Science, 1, 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canino, G., Lewis Fernández, R., & Bravo, M. (1997). Methodological challenges in cross-cultural mental health research. Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review, 34, 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, A. A., & Shear, M. K. (2002). Community-based intervention research: coping with the “noise”of real life in study design. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Ormel, J., & Stang, P. E. (2003). Comorbid mental disorders account for the role impairment of commonly occurring chronic physical disorders: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45(12), 1257–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Y. (1956). Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics, 12, 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F. (1983). The well-being of chronic mental patients: Assessing their quality of life. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F. (1995). Measuring quality of life in a reformed health system. Health Affairs, 14, 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F. (1996). Measures of quality of life among persons with severe and persistent mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 31, 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F., & Burns, B. J. (1990). Severe mental illness in the community. In B. Spiker (Ed.). Quality of life assessments in clinical trials (pp. 257–266). New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F., Ward, N. C., & Linn, L. S. (1982). Chronic mental patients: The quality of life issue. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1271–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matías-Carrelo, L., Chavez, L. M., Negrón, G., Canino, G., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., & Hoppe, S. (2003). The Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of five outcome measures. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 27, 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, J., Üstün, B., Saxena, S., Nelson, C. B., Chaterji, S., Ivis, F., et al. (1999), On the development and psychometric testing of the WHO screening instrument to assess disablement in the general population. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 8, 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E. (1998). Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Statistical Methods in Medicine Research, 7, 301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Report by the Secretariat April 9, 2001.

  • World Health Organization. (1997). International classification of impairments, activities and participation. A manual of dimensions of disablement and functioning. Beta-1 draft for field trials. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ligia M. Chávez PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chávez, L.M., Canino, G., Negrón, G. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of Two Mental Health Outcome Measures: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II and Lehman’s Quality of Life Interview. Ment Health Serv Res 7, 145–159 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11020-005-5783-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11020-005-5783-4

Keywords

Navigation