Skip to main content
Log in

Positive Child Well-Being: An Index Based on Data for Individual Children

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health are used to develop an index of positive child well-being that has several innovative and important characteristics. It distinguishes child well-being from contexts of child development; it is built with rich micro-data (rather than population-level macro-data) to create unique measures of well-being for individual children; and it focuses on positive, rather than negative, aspects of development. These data can be aggregated to provide a perspective on the proportions of children in the population who are doing well on all, some, or no developmental domains. Based on child development theory and research, the index is constructed within a framework of four conceptually distinct developmental domains, each of which is comprised of three sub-domains. The index distinguishes among children in predicted directions, by poverty level and parental education. White children tend to do better than Hispanic or black children in all domains, though neither minority subgroup is consistently better or worse off than the other subgroup. Girls score slightly higher than boys on the index. About three in four children score positively on three or four domains. The index provides a composite, multidimensional view of positive child well-being that can be useful to researchers and policy analysts, and which addresses some weaknesses of other similar indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Consulted were: Elizabeth Hair, Ph.D., Sharon Vandivere, MPP Christine Theokas, Ph.D., Brett Brown, Ph.D., Bill O’Hare, Ph.D., and Kristin A. Moore, Ph.D.

  2. Comparisons of the distribution of index scores across the states with Census state-level data on child poverty reveals a similar pattern. State rankings on the indices tend to mirror rankings on other, theoretically related measures of child well-being, such the teen birth rate, and other well-being indices, such as the composite state rankings published by KIDS COUNT. For example, children in Vermont and Minnesota do well on our index, while children in Mississippi and Louisiana do poorly.

References

  1. Moore, K. A. (1997). Criteria for indicators of child well-being. In R. M. Hauser, B. B. Brown, & W. R. Prosser (Eds.), Indicators of child well-being. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, B., & Corbett, T. (1997). Social indicators and public policy in the age of devolution. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2010). KIDS COUNT data book (p. 2010). Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Foundation for Child Development. (2010). 2010 Child and youth well-being index. New York: Foundation for Child Development.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Hare, W., & Gutierrez, F. (2011). Comprehensive assessment of child well-being indices: The state of the art. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, K. A., Evans, V. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Roth, J. (2001). What are good child outcomes? In A. Thornton (Ed.), The well-being of children and families: Research and data needs. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington DC: National Research Council Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moore, K. A., Lippman, L., & Brown, B. (2004). Indicators of child well-being: The promise for positive youth development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, K. A., & Theokas, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a monitoring system for indicators in middle childhood. Child Indicators Research, 1, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lippman, L. H, Moore, K. A., & McIntosh, H. (2009). Positive indicators of child well-being: A conceptual framework, measures and methodological issues. Innocenti Working Paper No. 2009-21. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

  11. Carle, A. C., Blumberg, S. J., Moore, K. A., & Mbwana, K. (2011). Advanced psychometric methods for developing and evaluating cut-point-based indicators. Child Indicators Research, 4, 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Hare, W., & Lee, M. (2007). Factors affecting state differences in child well-being. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Margot Bloch, Elizabeth Hair, and Sharon Vandivere for their consultation. We further thank the Annie E. Casey Foundation for financial support under grant # 202.0913.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin A. Moore.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Content of the child well-being and contextual well-being indices and percentage of children (ages 6–17) classified as achieving well-being on the indicator, subdomain, or domain composite

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, K.A., Murphey, D. & Bandy, T. Positive Child Well-Being: An Index Based on Data for Individual Children. Matern Child Health J 16 (Suppl 1), 119–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1001-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1001-3

Keywords

Navigation