Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Probabilistic Linkage of Assisted Reproductive Technology Information with Vital Records, Massachusetts 1997–2000

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the validity of probabilistic linkage (PL) in combining national surveillance data on assisted reproductive technology (ART) with Massachusetts birth and infant death data, for the purpose of monitoring maternal and child health outcomes of ART. A study conducted in 2006 utilized direct identifiers to match Massachusetts birth records with records on ART procedures performed to Massachusetts residents in fertility clinics located in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, achieving a linkage rate of 87.5%. The present study employed PL using the program Link Plus, without access to direct identifiers. The primary linking variables were maternal and infant dates of birth, and plurality. Ancillary variables such as maternal ZIP code and gravidity helped resolve duplicate matches and capture additional matches. PL linked 5,390 (87.8%) of 6,139 deliveries, correctly identifying 96.4% of the matches previously obtained using deterministic linkage methods. PL yielded a high linkage rate with satisfactory validity; this method may be applied in other states to help monitor the maternal and child health outcomes of ART.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention. (2010). American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2008 Assisted reproductive technology success rate. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention. (1997). American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 1995 Assisted reproductive technology success rate. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reynolds, M. A., Schieve, L. A., Martin, J. A., Jeng, G., & Macaluso, M. (2003). Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997–2000. Pediatrics, 111, 1159–1162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Capri Workshop Group. (2000). Multiple gestation pregnancy. Human Reproduction, 15, 1856–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin, J. A., & Menacker, F. (2007). Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2004. National Vital Statistics Reports, 55(12), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Z., Macaluso, M., Cohen, B., Schieve, L. A., Nannini, A., Chen, M., et al., for the Massachusetts Consortium for Assisted Reproductive Technology Epidemiologic Research (MCARTER). (2009). Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on the Massachusetts birth certificate, 1997–2000. Fertility and Sterility, in press.

  7. Sunderam, S., Schieve, L. A., Cohen, B., Zhang, Z., Jeng, G., Reynolds, M. A., et al., Massachusetts Consortium for the Assisted Reproductive Technology Epidemiologic Research (MCARTER). (2006). Linking birth and infant death records with assisted reproductive technology data: Massachusetts, 1997–1998. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schieve, L. A., Cohen, B., Nannini, A., Ferre, C., Reynolds, M., Zhang, Z., et al., for the Massachusetts Consortium for Assisted Reproductive Technology Epidemiologic Research (MCARTER). (2007). A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11, 517–525.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Korzeniewski, S. J., Grigorescu, V., Copeland, G., Gu, G., Thoburn, K. K., Rogers, J. D., et al. (2010). Methodological innovations in data gathering: newborn screening linkage with live births records, Michigan, 1/2007–3/2008. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(3), 360–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, J. C., Soliman, A. S., Tadgerson, D., Copeland, G. E., Seefeld, D. A., Pingatore, N. L., et al. (2009). Tribal linkage and race data quality for American Indians in a state cancer registry. The American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, 549–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fellegi, I. P., & Sunter, A. B. (1969). A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 1183–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Piper, J. M., Mitchel, E. F., Jr, Snowden, M., Hall, C., Adams, M., & Taylor, P. (1993). Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. American Journal of Epidemiology, 137(7), 758–768.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell, K. M., Deck, D., & Krupski, A. (2008). Record linkage software in the public domain: A comparison of Link Plus, The Link King, and a ‘basic’ deterministic algorithm. Health Informatics Journal, 14, 5–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grigorescu, V., Zhang, Y., Macaluso, M., Durant, T. (2010). Differences in pregnancy outcomes of assisted reproductive technology by infertility diagnosis Michigan, 2000–2004. December 2010. 16th Annual MCH EPI conference, San Antonio, TX, USA.

  15. Westphal, L., Grigorescu, V., Sappenfield, W., Freeman, K. (2010). Maternal demographic characteristics for the Florida assisted reproductive technology-vital records linked file. December 2010. 16th Annual MCH EPI conference, San Antonio, TX, USA.

  16. Cohen, B., Macaluso, M., Molotnikov, L., Sappenfield, W., Silver, M., West, J., Westphal, L., Zhang, Y. (2010). Can birth certificate data be used to assess assisted reproductive technology (the Florida and Massachusetts experience)? December 2010. 16th Annual MCH EPI conference, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Massachusetts Department of Public Health for their support of birth and infant death data and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) for their support of ART data, their contributions are essential to the completion of the research.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yujia Zhang.

Additional information

Disclaimer : The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Cohen, B., Macaluso, M. et al. Probabilistic Linkage of Assisted Reproductive Technology Information with Vital Records, Massachusetts 1997–2000. Matern Child Health J 16, 1703–1708 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0877-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0877-7

Keywords

Navigation