Skip to main content
Log in

Pre-adolescents’ representations of multiple attachment relationships: the role of perceived teacher interpersonal behaviour

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attachment theory proposes that early parent–child relationships provide the basis for all future close relationships of the individual, through childhood and adolescence into later life. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between parental attachment, peer attachment and students’ perceptions of their teacher’s interpersonal behaviour, in order to shed light on the channels through which these constructs relate. In doing so, we examined three proposed theoretical schemes of pre-adolescents’ representations of multiple relationships. As a side-goal, the psychometric properties of the Greek translations of the Revised Inventory of Parental and Peer Attachment (IPPA-R) and the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI-G) were investigated. Two independent samples comprising 270 and 306 pre-adolescents (grades 5–7), respectively participated in the study. Results supported a four-factor structure of the IPPA-R and an elliptical shape for the Interpersonal Teacher Circle measured by the QTI-G. The integrative scheme regarding pre-adolescents’ multiple adult relationships was supported by the data. Parental attachment relationships were found to be an important determinant of students’ perceptions of their teacher interpersonal behaviour, which in turn mediated the relationship between parental and peer attachment relationships. Results are discussed in terms of their theoretical and practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The last two assumptions are considered extremely strict and their empirical verification is approximate.

  2. The Greek elementary school comprises grades 1–6 and the junior high school grades 7–9, which is a policy present in many countries (International Bureau of Education 2008).

  3. A rotation requesting 3 factors was also performed, based on the instrument’s original structure. However, again, only two meaningful factors were extracted. The third factor in each case had a small number of items, which were conceptually distant and had correlations too low to produce reliable factors.

  4. An orthogonal rotation was considered, based on the independence assumption regarding the two factors in terms of the IPC-T (Wubbels et al. 1985).

  5. The examined structure deviated somewhat from the proposed QTI structure for three reasons. First, the current structure meets the basic requirements of the QTI in terms of Interpersonal Theory (i.e. the eight subscales need to represent two uncorrelated dimensions and the subscales should be ordered in a circular position around these dimensions) (den Brok et al. 2003; Kyriakides 2005; Wubbels et al. 2012). Second, previous studies have consistently supported a deviating structure regarding the Control dimension (e.g., Charalampous and Kokkinos 2011, 2013; Fisher et al. 2007; Kyriakides 2005; Scott and Fisher 2004). Finally, evidence from the EFA analysis with the present data clearly supports these deviations, QTI basic requirements and previous literature. In addition, it is not unusual to reformulate the subscales in order to meet the aforementioned requirements in the QTI literature (Zijlstra et al. 2013).

References

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., Moore, C., Kuperminc, G., & Bell, K. (1998). Attachment and adolescent psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 69, 1406–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., Porter, M., McFarland, C., McElhaney, K. B., & Marsh, P. (2007). The relation of attachment security to adolescents’ paternal and peer relationships, depression, and externalizing behavior. Child Development, 78, 1222–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Yagon, M., & Mikulincer, M. (2006). Children’s appraisal of teacher as a secure base and their socio-emotional and academic adjustment in middle childhood. Research in Education, 75, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos 7.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Relationships to well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher–child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi, A. N., & Enders, C. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. I. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

  • Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K. A. (2008). Internal working models in attachment relationships: Elaborating a central construct in attachment theory. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 102–127). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, B. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 136–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buote, C. A. (2000). Relations of autonomy and relatedness to school functioning and psychological adjustment during adolescence (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/11144. Accessed 1 April 2009.

  • Charalampous, K., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2011, January). A cross-cultural adaptation of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction for Greek elementary students with the application of mixed-methods approach. Paper presented at the 24th International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Limassol, Cyprus.

  • Charalampous, K., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2013). The model of interpersonal teacher behavior: A qualitative cross-cultural validation within the Greek elementary education context. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 182–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalampous, K., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2014). Students’ Big three personality traits, perceptions of teacher interpersonal behavior and academic achievement: An application of the reciprocal causation model. Communication Education, 63, 235–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. T., Greenberg, M. T., & Kusche, C. A. (1995, March). People in my life: Attachment relationships in middle childhood. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.

  • Crowell, J. A., & Waters, E. (1994). Bowlby’s theory grown up: The role of attachment in adult love relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student–teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Brok, P., Fisher, D. L., Brekelmans, M., Rickards, T., Wubbels, T., Levy, J., & Waldrip, B. (2003, April). Students’ perceptions of secondary teachers’ interpersonal style in six countries: A study on the validity of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • den Brok, P., van Tartwijk, J., Wubbels, T., & Veldman, I. (2010). The differential effect of the teacher–student interpersonal relationship on student outcomes for students with different ethnic backgrounds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne, S., & Larose, S. (2007). Adolescent parental attachment and academic motivation and performance in early adolescence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1501–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, G. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). Adolescents’ satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school engagement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. L., den Brok, P., & Rickards, T. (2006). Factors influencing students’ perceptions of their teachers’ interpersonal behavior: A multilevel analysis. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: Worldviews (pp. 51–74). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. L., Waldrip, B., Dorman, J., & den Brok, P. (2007, April). Interpersonal behavior styles of science teachers in primary education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (2005). Research on teacher–student relationships and learning environments: Context, retrospect and prospect. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnman, W., Simon, V. A., Shaffer, L., & Bouchey, H. A. (2002). Adolescents’ working models and styles for relationships with parents, friends, and romantic partners. Child Development, 73, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Validation of an elementary school version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Psychological Reports, 79, 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., & Goldwyn, R. (2002). Attachment disorganisation and psychopathology: New findings in attachment research and their potential implications for developmental psychopathology in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 835–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarnieri, S., Ponti, L., & Tani, F. (2010). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA): A study on the validity of styles of adolescent attachment to parents and peers in an Italian sample. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 17, 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullone, E., & Robinson, K. (2005). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment Revised (IPPA-R) for children: A psychometric investigation. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurtman, M. B. (2009). Exploring personality with the interpersonal circumplex. Social Psychology Compass,. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2099.00172.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. (2012). The factor structure of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment in a clinic-referred sample of anxious Latino youth (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from Florida International University Electronic Theses and Dissertations (paper 652).

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M. L., & Strack, S. (2011). Handbook of interpersonal psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. (1999). Attachment relationships in the context of multiple caregivers. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 671–687). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. (2000). Social-emotional classroom climate in child care, child–teacher relationships and children’s second grade peer relations. Social Development, 9, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Philipsen, L. C. (1998). Stability and continuity of caregiver and child–peer relationships. Child Development, 69, 418–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C., Matheson, C. C., & Hamilton, C. E. (1994). Maternal, teacher, and child care history correlates of children’s relationships with peers. Child Development, 65, 264–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Bureau of Education. (2008). International congress of educationNational report: Greece. The author. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/National_Reports/ICE_2008/greece_NR08.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2012.

  • Jacobite, D., & Hazen, N. (1999). Developmental pathways from infant disorganization to childhood peer relationships. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (pp. 671–687). New York: Milford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, T., & Hofmann, V. (1997). Children’s attachment representations: Longitudinal relations to school behavior and academic competency in middle childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 33, 703–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. N., Ketring, S. C., & Abshire, C. (2003). The revised inventory of parent attachment: Measuring attachment in families. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25, 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerns, K. A., Schlegelmilch, A., Morgan, T. A., & Abraham, M. M. (2005). Assessing attachment in middle childhood. In K. A. Kerns & R. A. Richardson (Eds.), Attachment in middle childhood (pp. 46–70). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2008). The effects of children’s perceptions of attachment security and emotion regulation on school disengagement among elementary school truants (Doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Louisiana, USA.

  • Kokkinos, C. M., Charalambous, K., & Davazoglou, A. (2009). Interpersonal teacher behavior in primary school classrooms: A cross-cultural validation of a Greek translation of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research, 12, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinos, C. M., Charalambous, K., & Davazoglou, A. (2010). Primary school teacher interpersonal behavior through the lens of students’ Eysenckian personality traits. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1990). The role of poor peer relationships in the development of disorder. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood: Cambridge studies in social and emotional development (pp. 274–305). New York: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides, L. (2005). Drawing from teacher effectiveness research and research into teacher interpersonal behavior to establish a teacher evaluation system: A study on the use of student ratings to evaluate teacher behavior. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40, 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (1998). Attachment to parents, social support expectations, and socioemotional adjustment during the high school–college transition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, T. (1957). An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald-Press Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. L. (2008). An examination of three models of the relationships between parental attachments and adolescents’ social functioning and depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainhard, M. T., Pennings, H. J. M., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2012). Mapping control and affiliation in teacher–student interaction with state space grids. Teaching and Teacher Education,. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. H., & DeRosier, M. E. (2008). Teacher preference, peer rejection, and student aggression: A prospective study of transactional influence and independent contributions to emotional adjustment and grades. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 661–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor, N., Zinbarg, R. E., Craske, M. G., Mineka, S., Uliaszek, A., Rose, R., et al. (2008). Evaluating the invariance of the factor structure of the EPQ-R-N among adolescents. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, A. B., & Nagle, R. J. (2005). Parent and peer attachment in late childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikiforou, M., Georgiou, S. N., & Stavrinides, P. (2013). Attachment to parents and peers as a parameter of bullying and victimization. Journal of Criminology,. doi:10.1155/2013/484871.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E. E., & McCartney, K. (2006). Testing associations between young children’s relationships with mothers and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E. E., Collins, B. A., & Supplee, L. (2012). Behavior problems in late childhood: The roles of early maternal attachment and teacher–child relationship trajectories. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2012). Education at a glance 2012: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. S., San Martini, P., & Zavattini, G. C. (2011). The factor structure of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA): A survey of Italian adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantouli, E. M. (2012). Adolescents’ perception of their bonding with their mother, their father and their friends [Αντιλήψεις των εφήβων για το δέσμο με τη μητέρα, τον πατέρα και τους φίλους τους] (Doctoral dissertation). Aristotle University of Thessaloniki: Thessaloniki, Greece.

  • Pennings, H. J., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., van der Want, A. C., Claessens, L. C., & van Tartwijk, J. (2014). A nonlinear dynamical systems approach to real-time teacher behavior: Differences between teachers. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 18, 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992, April). Relationships between children and their kindergarten teachers. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meetings, Seattle.

  • Ridenour, T. A., Greenberg, M. T., & Cook, E. T. (2006). Structure and validity of people in my life: A self-report measure of attachment in late childhood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 1037–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudasill, K. M., Niehaus, K., Buhs, E., & White, J. M. (2013). Temperament in early childhood and peer interactions in third grade: The role of teacher–child relationships in early elementary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. H., Atkinson, L., & Tardif, C. (2001). Child–parent attachment and children’s peer relations: A quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 37, 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. H., & Younger, A. J. (1996). Adolescent–parent attachment and adolescents’ relations with their peers: A closer look. Youth and Society, 28, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. H., & Fisher, D. L. (2004). Development, validation and application of a Malay translation of an elementary version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Research in Science Education, 34, 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Screen, K. E. (2011). The influence of childparent and childteacher relationships on the academic performance of children aged 1012 years (Doctoral dissertation). Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Shochet, I., Homel, R., & Montgomery, D. (2008). How do school connectedness and attachment to parents interrelate in predicting adolescent depressive symptoms? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 676–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, S., & Horowitz, L. M. (2011). Introduction. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 1–13). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijs, J., Koomen, H. M. Y., Roorda, D., & ten Hagen, J. (2011). Explaining teacher–student interactions in early childhood: An interpersonal theoretical approach. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. A. (2008). Early attachment and later development: Familiar questions, new answers. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 348–365). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Goldberg, S., Kroonenberg, P. M., & Frenkel, O. J. (1992). The relative effects of maternal and child problems on the quality of attachment: A meta-analysis of attachment in clinical samples. Child Development, 63, 840–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignoli, E., & Mallet, P. (2004). Validation of a brief measure of adolescents’ parent attachment based on Armsden and Greenberg’s three-dimension model. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In H. R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T. (1993). Teacher-student relationships in science and mathematics classes (What research says to the science and mathematics teacher, No. 11). Perth: National Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology.

  • Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Levy, J., Mainhard, T., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2012). Let’s make things better. In T. Wubbels, P. Den Brok, J. Van Tartwijk, & J. Levy (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships in education: An overview of contemporary research (pp. 225–250). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In C. Evertson & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research practice and contemporary issues (pp. 1161–1191). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Wijsman, L., Mainhard, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2014). Teacher–student relationships and classroom management. In E. T. Emmer & E. J. Saborne (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management (pp. 363–386). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T., Créton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985, March–April). Discipline problems of beginning teachers: Interactional teacher behavior mapped out. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago.

  • Zijlstra, H., Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2013). Child perceptions of teacher interpersonal behavior and associations with mathematics achievement in Dutch early grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 517–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyriakos Charalampous.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Charalampous, K., Kokkinos, C.M., Apota, E. et al. Pre-adolescents’ representations of multiple attachment relationships: the role of perceived teacher interpersonal behaviour. Learning Environ Res 19, 63–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9196-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9196-z

Keywords

Navigation