Top

Gepubliceerd in:

18-01-2016 | Empirical Research

Promoting Youth Agency Through Dimensions of Gay–Straight Alliance Involvement and Conditions that Maximize Associations

Auteurs: V. Paul Poteat, Jerel P. Calzo, Hirokazu Yoshikawa

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 7/2016

Abstract

Gay–Straight Alliances (GSAs) may promote wellbeing for sexual minority youth (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, or questioning youth) and heterosexual youth. We considered this potential benefit of GSAs in the current study by examining whether three GSA functions—support/socializing, information/resource provision, and advocacy—contributed to sense of agency among GSA members while controlling for two major covariates, family support and the broader school LGBT climate. The sample included 295 youth in 33 Massachusetts GSAs (69 % LGBQ, 68 % cisgender female, 68 % white; M _age = 16.06 years). Based on multilevel models, as hypothesized, youth who received more support/socializing, information/resources, and did more advocacy in their GSA reported greater agency. Support/socializing and advocacy distinctly contributed to agency even while accounting for the contribution of family support and positive LGBT school climate. Further, advocacy was associated with agency for sexual minority youth but not heterosexual youth. Greater organizational structure enhanced the association between support/socializing and agency; it also enhanced the association between advocacy and agency for sexual minority youth. These findings begin to provide empirical support for specific functions of GSAs that could promote wellbeing and suggest conditions under which their effects may be enhanced.

vorige artikel Wanting to See People Like Me? Racial and Gender Diversity in Popular Adolescent Television

volgende artikel Intergenerational Transmission of Tridimensional Cultural Orientations in Chinese American Families: The Role of Bicultural Socialization

Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7–10.CrossRef

Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98–124.CrossRef

Davis, B., Stafford, M. B. R., & Pullig, C. (2014). How Gay–Straight Alliance groups mitigate the relationship between gay-bias victimization and adolescent suicide attempts. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 1271–1278.CrossRefPubMed

Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47, 259–269.CrossRefPubMed

Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75, 159–210.CrossRef

Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 399–419.CrossRefPubMed

Fields, J., & Russell, S. T. (2005). Queer, sexuality, and gender activism. In L. R. Sherrod, C. A. Flanagan, & R. Kassimir (Eds.), Youth activism: An international encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 512–514). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Developmental benefits of extracurricular involvement: Do peer characteristics mediate the link between activities and youth outcomes? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 507–520.CrossRef

Ginwright, S. (2007). Black youth activism and the role of critical social capital in Black community organizations. The American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 403–418.CrossRef

GLSEN. (2015). About gay-straight alliances. Retrieved from http://www.glsen.org.

Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474.CrossRefPubMed

Griffin, P., Lee, C., Waugh, J., & Beyer, C. (2004). Describing roles that Gay–Straight Alliances play in schools: From individual support to social change. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Issues in Education, 1, 7–22.CrossRef

Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403–426.CrossRef

GSA Network. (2015). National directory. Retrieved from http://www.gsanetwork.org.

Heck, N. C., Flentje, A., & Cochran, B. N. (2011). Offsetting risks: High school Gay–Straight Alliances and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 161–174.CrossRef

Heck, N. C., Lindquist, L. M., Stewart, B. T., Brennan, C., & Cochran, B. N. (2013). To join or not to join: Gay–Straight Student Alliances and the high school experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youths. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 25, 77–101.CrossRef

Heck, N. C., Livingston, N. A., Flentje, A., Oost, K., Stewart, B. T., & Cochran, B. N. (2014). Reducing risk for illicit drug use and prescription drug misuse: High school Gay–Straight alliances and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 824–828.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Inkelas, K. K. (2004). Does participation in ethnic cocurricular activities facilitate a sense of ethnic awareness and understanding? A study of Asian Pacific American undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 285–301.CrossRef

Koepke, S., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2012). Dynamics of identity development and separation-individuation in parent–child relationships during adolescence and emerging adulthood—A conceptual integration. Developmental Review, 32, 67–88.CrossRef

Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.CrossRefPubMed

Larson, R. (2006). Positive youth development, willful adolescents, and mentoring. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 677–689.CrossRef

Larson, R., & Angus, R. M. (2011). Adolescents’ development of skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think strategically. Child Development, 82, 277–294.CrossRefPubMed

Mahoney, J. L., Harris, A. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the over-scheduling hypothesis. SRCD Social Policy Report, 20, 3–31.

Mayo, C. (2008). Obscene associations: Gay-straight alliances, the Equal Access Act, and abstinence-only policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy: A Journal of the NSRC, 5, 45–55.

Miceli, M. (2005). Standing out, standing together: The social and political impact of Gay–Straight Alliances. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Mustanski, B. (2011). Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: A call to action for a scientifically informed approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 673–686.CrossRefPubMed

Pearce, N. J., & Larson, R. W. (2006). How teens become engaged in youth development programs: The process of motivational change in a civic activism organization. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 121–131.CrossRef

Poteat, V. P., Sinclair, K. O., DiGiovanni, C. D., Koenig, B. W., & Russell, S. T. (2013). Gay–Straight Alliances are associated with student health: A multi-school comparison of LGBTQ and heterosexual youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 319–330.CrossRef

Poteat, V. P., Yoshikawa, H., Calzo, J. P., Gray, M. L., DiGiovanni, C. D., Lipkin, A., et al. (2015). Contextualizing Gay–Straight Alliances: Student, advisor, and structural factors related to positive youth development among members. Child Development, 86, 176–193.CrossRefPubMed

Ramey, H. L., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2012). Contexts of structured youth activities and positive youth development. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 85–91.CrossRef

Russell, S. T. (2005). Beyond risk: Resilience in the lives of sexual minority youth. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Issues in Education, 2, 5–18.CrossRef

Russell, S. T., Muraco, A., Subramaniam, A., & Laub, C. (2009). Youth empowerment and high school Gay–Straight Alliances. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 891–903.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Russell, S. T., Kosciw, J., Horn, S., & Saewyc, E. (2010). Safe schools policy for LGBTQ students. Society for Research in Child Development Social Policy Report, 24(4), 3–17.

Saewyc, E. M. (2011). Research on adolescent sexual orientation: Development, health disparities, stigma, and resilience. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 256–272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 321–335.CrossRefPubMed

Taines, C. (2012). Intervening in alienation: The outcomes for urban youth of participating in school activism. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 53–86.CrossRef

Toomey, R. B., & Russell, S. T. (2013). Gay–Straight Alliances, social justice involvement, and school victimization of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer youth: Implications for school well-being and plans to vote. Youth & Society, 45, 500–522.CrossRef

Walls, N. E., Kane, S. B., & Wisneski, H. (2010). Gay–Straight Alliances and school experiences of sexual minority youth. Youth & Society, 41, 307–332.CrossRef

Watson, L. B., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Graybill, E. C. (2010). Gay–Straight Alliance advisors: Negotiating multiple ecological systems when advocating for LGBTQ youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 7, 100–128.CrossRef

Wood, D., Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2009). How adolescents come to see themselves as more responsible through participation in youth programs. Child Development, 80, 295–309.CrossRefPubMed

Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.CrossRef

Titel: Promoting Youth Agency Through Dimensions of Gay–Straight Alliance Involvement and Conditions that Maximize Associations
Auteurs: V. Paul Poteat
Jerel P. Calzo
Hirokazu Yoshikawa
Publicatiedatum: 18-01-2016
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0421-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2016

Parental Acculturative Stressors and Adolescent Adjustment Through Interparental and Parent–Child Relationships in Chinese American Families

The Impact of African American Parents’ Racial Discrimination Experiences and Perceived Neighborhood Cohesion on their Racial Socialization Practices

Advancing Understanding of Acculturation for Adolescents of Asian Immigrants: Person-Oriented Analysis of Acculturation Strategy Among Korean American Youth

Money, Peers and Parents: Social and Economic Aspects of Inequality in Youth Wellbeing

The Everyday Implications of Ethnic-Racial Identity Processes: Exploring Variability in Ethnic-Racial Identity Salience Across Situations

Perspective Taking Explains Gender Differences in Late Adolescents’ Attitudes Toward Disadvantaged Groups