Skip to main content
Log in

The Association Between Cyber Victimization and Subsequent Cyber Aggression: The Moderating Effect of Peer Rejection

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescents experience various forms of strain in their lives that may contribute jointly to their engagement in cyber aggression. However, little attention has been given to this idea. To address this gap in the literature, the present longitudinal study examined the moderating influence of peer rejection on the relationship between cyber victimization at Time 1 (T1) and subsequent cyber aggression at Time 2 (T2; 6 months later) among 261 (150 girls) 6th, 7th, and 8th graders. Our findings indicated that both peer rejection and cyber victimization were related to T2 peer-nominated and self-reported cyber aggression, both relational and verbal, after controlling for gender and T1 cyber aggression. Furthermore, T1 cyber victimization was related more strongly to T2 peer-nominated and self-reported cyber aggression at higher levels of T1 peer rejection. These results extend previous findings regarding the relationship between peer rejection and face-to-face aggressive behaviors to the cyber context. In addition, our findings underscore the importance of utilizing multiple methods, such as peer-nomination and self-report, to assess cyber aggression in a school setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41(4), 387–397. doi:10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badaly, D., Schwartz, D., & Gorman, A. (2012). Social status, perceived social reputations, and perceived dyadic relationships in early adolescence. Social Development, 212(3), 482–500. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00646.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnow, S., Lucht, M., & Freyberger, H. (2005). Correlates of aggressive and delinquent conduct problems in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 31(1), 24–39. doi:10.1002/ab.20033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, S. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(6), 803–833. doi:10.1177/0272431609350927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellmore, A., Jiang, X., & Juvonen, J. (2010). Utilizing peer nominations in middle school: A longitudinal comparison between complete classroom-based and random list methods. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 538–550. doi:10.1111/j.153-7795.2010.00640.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., & Ferron, J. (2002). Emerging risks of violence in the digital age: Lessons for educators from an online study of adolescent girls in the United States. Journal of School Violence, 1(2), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boneva, B., Quinn, A., Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., & Sklovski, I. (2006). Teenage communication in the instant messaging era. In R. Brynin & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Information technology at home (pp. 612–672). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Doyle, A. B., Markiewicz, D., & Bukowski, W. M. (2002). Boyfriends, girlfriends, and same-sex peers: Relations to early adolescents’ emotional, behavioral, and academic adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48(1), 77–103. doi:10.1353/mpq.2002.0001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Lochman, J. E., Terry, R., & Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 783–792. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.60.5.783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722. doi:10.2307/1131945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., Grotpeter, J. K., & Bigbee, M. A. (2002). Relationally and physically aggressive children’s intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. Child Development, 73(4), 1134–1142. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Vollink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngster’s experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 11(2), 217–232. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, A., Sulkowski, M., Dempsey, J., & Storch, E. (2011). Has cyber technology produced a new group of peer aggressors? CyberPsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 14(5), 297–302. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRosier, M. E., & Mercer, S. H. (2009). Perceived behavioral atypicality as a predictor of social rejection and peer victimization: Implications of emotional adjustment and academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 46(4), 375–387. doi:10.1002/pits.20382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVoe, J., & Murphy, C. (2011). Student reports of bullying and cyber-bullying: Results from the 2009 school crime supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2011336.

  • Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2009). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender, and frequently and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12(1), 109–125. doi:10.1177/1461444809341260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L. (2002). Bullying in early adolescence: The role of the peer group. ERIC Digest. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED471912).

  • Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J. (2005). Online victimization: What youth tell us. In S. W. Cooper, R. J. Estes, A. P. Giardino, N. D. Kellogg, & V. I. Vieth (Eds.), Medical, legal, and social science aspects of child sexual exploitation: A comprehensive review of pornography, prostitution, and Internet crimes (Vol. 1, pp. 437–467). St. Louis: GW Medical Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fite, P. J., Colder, C. R., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2007). Pathways from proactive and reactive aggression to substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(3), 355–364. doi:10.1037/0893.164X.21.3.355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 205–213. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 587–599. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.3.587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, D. W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 20(2), 143–156. doi:10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2000). Predictors of peer victimization among urban youth. Social Development, 9(4), 521–543. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, S., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T., Toumbourou, J., et al. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(1), 59–65. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 677–685. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ialongo, N. S., Vaden-Kierman, N., & Kellam, S. (1998). Early peer rejection and aggression: Longitudinal relations with adolescent behavior. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 10(2), 199–213. doi:10.1023/B:JODD.0000036976.48023.a6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • i-SAFE America Inc. (2004). Cyber Bullying: Statistics and tips. Stop Bullying Now. Retrieved from http://www.isafe.org/channels/sub.php?ch=op&sub_id=media_cyber_bullying.

  • Jennings, W., & Komro, K. (2011). A longitudinal examination of the relationship between physical aggression and violent victimization among urban minority Chicago youth and young adults. The Open Family Studies Journal, 4(1), 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerome, L., & Segal, A. (2003). Bullying by internet. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(7), 751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views and peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 105–124). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Steffgen, G. (2010). Cyberbullying as an act of revenge? Australian Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 20(2), 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S22–S30. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2008). Cyber bullying—bullying in the digital age. Hoboken: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kupersmidt, J. B., & Coie, J. D. (1990). Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence. Child Development, 61(5), 1350–1362. doi:10.2307/1130747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Retrieved from: http://web.pewinternet.org/~/media/files/reports/2010/pip_social_media_and_young_adults_report_final_with_toplines.pdf.

  • Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157–170. doi:10.1177/0143034306064547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of adolescents’ experience related to cyberbullying. Educational Research, 50(3), 223–234. doi:10.1080/00131880802309333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, B., Downey, G., Bonica, C., & Paltin, I. (2007). Social causes and consequences of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(3), 481–506. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00531.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, E. E., Olaizola, J. H., Ferrer, B. M., & Ochoa, G. M. (2006). Aggressive and nonaggressive rejected students: An analysis of their differences. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 387–400. doi:10.1002/pits.20152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 387–393. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesdale, D., & Duff, A. (2011). Social identity, peer group rejection, and young children’s reactive, displaced, and proactive aggression. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 823–841. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02012.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 99–128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orobio de Castro, B., Slot, N. W., Bosch, J. D., Koops, W., & Veerman, J. W. (2003). Negative feelings exacerbates hostile attributions of intent in highly aggressive boys. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(1), 57–66. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3201_06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Forms of aggression and peer victimization during early childhood: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(3), 311–322. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9179-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Asher, S. R. (1992). Peer rejection in middle school: Subgroup differences in behavior, loneliness, and interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 231–241. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.2.231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth & Society, 43(2), 727–751. doi:10.1177/0044118X10366951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 807–814. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Malone, P. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2010). Domain specificity in relationship history, social-information processing, and violent behavior in early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 190–200. doi:10.1037/a0017991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81–94. doi:10.1002/ab.20336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of adolescent girls’ externalizing and health risk behaviors: A 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 103–112. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Putallaz, M., Grimes, C., Foster, K., Kupersmidt, J., Coie, J., & Dearing, K. (2007). Overt and relational aggression and victimization: Multiple perspectives within the school setting. Journal of School Psychology, 45(5), 523–547. doi:10.1016/jsp.2007.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raskauskas, J. (2010). Text-bullying: Associations with traditional bullying and depression among New Zealand adolescents. Journal of School Violence, 9(1), 74–97. doi:10.1080/15388220903185605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 564–575. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reijntjes, A., Thomaes, S., Kamphuis, J., Bushman, B., de Castro, B., & Teich, M. (2011). Explaining the paradoxical rejection-aggression link: The mediating effects of hostile intent attributions, anger, and decreases in state self-esteem on peer rejection-induced aggression in youth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 955–963. doi:10.1177/04146167211410247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). Ih8 u: Findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 643–671. doi:10.1080/01411920903071918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children’s self- and peer-perceptions. Child Development, 76(6), 1161–1171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. (2009, August). Cyberbullies: Their motives, characteristics, and types of bullying. Presentation at the XIV. European Conference of Developmental Psychology, Vilnius, Lithuania.

  • Schad, M. M., Szwedo, D. E., Antonishak, J., Hare, A., & Allen, J. P. (2008). The broader context of relational aggression in adolescent romantic relationships: Predictions from peer pressure and links to psychosocial functioning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(3), 346–358. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9226-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., Gorman Hopmeyer, A., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116–1127. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ševcíková, A., & Šmahel, D. (2009). Online harassment and cyberbullying in the Czech Republic: Comparison across age groups. Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 227–229. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, L. M., Clemans, K. H., Graber, J. A., & Lyndon, S. T. (2011). Traditional and cyber aggressors and victims: A comparison of psychosocial characteristics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(4), 392–404. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9575-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soper, D. (2010). Interaction! Unpublished copyrighted software. Retrieved from httpc:www.danielsoper.com.

  • Vandebosch, H., & van Cleemput, K. (2008). Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 499–503. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affect, and sex differences. Child Development, 81(2), 480–486. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624-2009.01411.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., & Tremblay, R. (2007). Peers and violence: A two-sided developmental perspective. In: D. J. Flannery, Alexander T., & Waldman, D. (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Volling, B. L., MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Rabiner, D., & Baradaran, L. P. (1993). Children’s social competence and sociometric status: Further exploration of aggression, social withdrawal, and peer rejection. Development and Psychopathology, 5(3), 459–483. doi:10.1017/S0954579400004521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, L. H., Patchin, J. W., & May, J. D. (2005). Reactions of victimized youth: Strain as an explanation of school delinquency. Western Criminology Review, 6(1), 104–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, N. E., & Crick, N. R. (2004). Maladaptive peer relationships and the development of relational and physical aggression during middle childhood. Social Development, 13(4), 495–514. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00280.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S14–S21. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2012). Kicking the digital dog: A longitudinal investigation of young adults’ victimization and cyber displaced aggression. CyberPsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 15(9), 448–454. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressors, victims, and aggressor/victims: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308–1316. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J. S., Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., & Thompson, B. (2000). Social cognitive differences between aggressive-rejected and aggressive-nonrejected children. Journal of School Psychology, 38(6), 551–570. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(00)00052-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Michelle F. Wright conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination of the study, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the data, and drafted and revised the manuscript. Yan Li participated in the design of the study, and helped with manuscript revisions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michelle F. Wright or Yan Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, M.F., Li, Y. The Association Between Cyber Victimization and Subsequent Cyber Aggression: The Moderating Effect of Peer Rejection. J Youth Adolescence 42, 662–674 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3

Keywords

Navigation