Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2013 | Empirical Research

Motives for Using Facebook, Patterns of Facebook Activities, and Late Adolescents’ Social Adjustment to College

Auteurs: Chia-chen Yang, B. Bradford Brown

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 3/2013

Abstract

Previous studies have confirmed that Facebook, the leading social networking site among young people, facilitates social connections among college students, but the specific activities and motives that foster social adjustment remain unclear. This study examined associations between patterns of Facebook activity, motives for using Facebook, and late adolescents’ social adjustment to the college environment. Anonymous self-report survey data from 193 mostly European American students (M age = 20.32; 54 % female) attending a major Midwestern university indicated that motives and activity patterns were associated directly with social adjustment, but the association between one activity, status updating, and social adjustment also was moderated by the motive of relationship maintenance. Findings provide a more comprehensive portrait of how Facebook use may foster or inhibit social adjustment in college.

vorige artikel Sexual Minority-Related Victimization as a Mediator of Mental Health Disparities in Sexual Minority Youth: A Longitudinal Analysis

volgende artikel Identity Profiles in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth: The Role of Family Influences

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computer in Human Behavior, 26, 100–109.CrossRef

Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., et al. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374.PubMedCrossRef

Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1989). The student adaptation to college questionnaire. http://portal.wpspublish.com/pdf/sacq.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

Bell, N. J., Wieling, E., & Watson, W. (2007). Narrative processes of identity construction: Micro indicators of developmental patterns following transition to university. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 7(1), 1–26.CrossRef

Blais, J. J., Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Connolly, J. (2008). Adolescents online: The importance of Internet activity choices to salient relationships. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 37, 522–536.CrossRef

boyd, d. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), McArthur foundation series on digital learning—youth, identity, and digital media Volume (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Braxton, J. M. (1999). Theory elaboration and research development: Toward a fuller understanding of college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 1(2), 93–97.CrossRef

Braxton, J. M., & McClendon, S. A. (2001/2002). The fostering of social integration and retention through institutional practice. Journal of College Student Retention, 3(1), 57–71.

Braxton, J. M., Sullivan, A. S., & Johnson, R. M. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 107–164). New York: Agathon Press.

Brenner, J. (2012). Pew Internet: Social networking (full detail). Washington, D. C.: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

Buote, V. M., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. W., Adams, G., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., Polivy, J., et al. (2007). The importance of friends: Friendship and adjustment among 1-year university students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 665–689.CrossRef

Chan, D. K.-S., & Cheng, G. H.-L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship quality at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 305–320.CrossRef

Chow, K., & Healey, M. (2008). Place attachment and place identity: First-year undergraduates making the transition from home to university. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 362–372.CrossRef

Cummings, J. N., Lee, J. B., & Kraut, R. (2006). Communication technology and friendship during the transition from high school to college. In R. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the internet: Domesticating information technology (pp. 265–278). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cutrona, C. (1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social adjustment. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A source-book of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 291–309). New York: Wiley-Interscience.

Davies, J. (2012). Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers & Education, 59, 19–29.CrossRef

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.PubMedCrossRef

Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441.CrossRef

Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.CrossRef

Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.CrossRef

Erikson, E. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: W. W. Norton.

Facebook.com. Key facts. http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23(3), 295–302.PubMedCrossRef

Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152–177.CrossRef

Gosling, S. D., Augustine, A. A., Vazire, S., Holtzman, N., & Gaddis, S. (2011). Manifestations of personality in online social networks: Self-reported facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 483–488.CrossRef

Hays, R. B., & Oxley, D. (1986). Social network development and functioning during a life transition. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 50(2), 305–313.CrossRef

Ho, S. M. Y., & Lee, T. M. C. (2001). Computer usage and its relationship with adolescent lifestyle in Hong Kong. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 258–266.PubMedCrossRef

Hum, N. J., Chamberlin, P. E., Hambright, B. L., Portwood, A. C., Schat, A. C., & Bevan, J. L. (2011). A picture is worth a thousand words: A content analysis of facebook profile photographs. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1828–1833.CrossRef

Hussong, A. M., Galloway, C. A., & Feagans, L. A. (2005). Coping motives as a moderator of daily mood-drinking covariation. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66(3), 344–353.PubMed

Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. Proceedings of the 2008 CHI (pp. 1027–1036). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Jones, S. (2003). Let the games begin: Gaming technology and entertainment among college students. Washington, D. C.: PEW Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2003/PIP_College_Gaming_Reporta.pdf.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

Junco, R. (2012a). The relationship between frequency of facebook use, participation in facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162–171.CrossRef

Junco, R. (2012b). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198.CrossRef

Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 183–189.CrossRef

Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Kim, J., & Lee, J.-E. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 359–364.CrossRef

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74.CrossRef

Lahey, B. B., Applegate, B., Waldman, I. D., Loft, J. D., Hankin, B. L., & Rick, J. (2004). The structure of child and adolescent psychopathology: Generating new hypotheses. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(3), 358–385.PubMedCrossRef

Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 167–170). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Ledesma, R. D., & Valero-Mora, P. (2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out Parallel Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(2). http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n2.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

Lenhart, A., Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Macgill, A. R., Evans, C., & Vitak, J. (2008). Teens, video games, and civics. Washington, D. C.: PEW Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Teens_Games_and_Civics_Report_FINAL.pdf.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Washington, D. C.: PEW Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/198/report_display.asp. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, D. C.: PEW Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 446–458.CrossRef

Manago, A. M., Taylor, T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2012). Me and my 400 friends: The anatomy of college students’ facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 369–380.PubMedCrossRef

Mesch, G. S., & Talmud, I. (2010). Wired youth: The social world of adolescence in the information age. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L. A., Egan, K. G., Cox, E., Young, H., Gannon, K. E., et al. (2011). Feeling bad on Facebook: Depression disclosure by college students on a social networking site. Depression and Anxiety, 28(6), 447–455.PubMedCrossRef

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402.CrossRef

Oswald, D. L., & Clark, E. M. (2003). Best friends forever?: High school best friendships and the transition to college. Personal Relationships, 10, 187–196.CrossRef

Park, N., Kee, K., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–733.CrossRef

Patil, V. H., Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Donavan, D. T. (2008). Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the ‘eigenvalue greater than one’ criterion. Journal of Business Research, 61, 162–170.CrossRef

Paul, E., & Brier, S. (2001). Friendsickness in the transition to college: Precollege predictors and college adjustment correlates. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79, 77–89.CrossRef

Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238.CrossRef

Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. (2006). Characteristics and motives of adolescents talking with strangers on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 526–530.CrossRef

Pornsakulvanich, V., Haridakis, P., & Rubin, A. M. (2008). The influence of dispositions and Internet motivation on online communication satisfaction and relationship closeness. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2292–2310.CrossRef

Reich, S. M. (2010). Adolescents’ sense of community on MySpace and Facebook: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(6), 688–705.CrossRef

Reich, S. M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Espinoza, G. (2012). Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents’ offline and online social networks. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 356–368.PubMedCrossRef

Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40.PubMedCrossRef

Scanlon, L., Rowling, L., & Weber, Z. (2007). ‘You don’t have to like an identity…you are just lost in a crowd’: Forming a student identity in the first-year transition to university. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(2), 223–241.CrossRef

Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67–75.CrossRef

Steinfield, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434–445.CrossRef

Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420–433.CrossRef

Swenson, L. M., Nordstrom, A., & Hiester, M. (2008). The role of peer relationships in adjustment to college. Journal of College Student Development, 49(6), 551–567.CrossRef

Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Toma, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). A new twist on love’s labor: Self-presentation in online dating profiles. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 41–55). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Tosun, L. P. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1510–1517.CrossRef

Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12(2), 215–229.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277.PubMedCrossRef

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59, 79–97.CrossRef

Weiser, E. B. (2001). The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(6), 723–742.CrossRef

Yang, C.-c., & Brown, B. B. (2009). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students’ peer relations. In B. B. Brown & P. M. Greenfield (Chairs), Electronic connections: Impact of communication media on adolescents’ peer relationships. Symposium presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver.

Ye, J. (2006). Traditional and online support networks in the cross-cultural adaptation of Chinese international students in the United States. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 863–876.CrossRef

Zhang, F., Shen, M., Xu, M., Zhu, H., & Zhou, N. (2006). A structural equation modeling of motives, behaviors of Internet use and related social-psychological health. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(3), 407–413.

Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816–1836.CrossRef

Titel: Motives for Using Facebook, Patterns of Facebook Activities, and Late Adolescents’ Social Adjustment to College
Auteurs: Chia-chen Yang
B. Bradford Brown
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2013
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9836-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2013

Identity Profiles in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth: The Role of Family Influences

Damon Barrett (ed.): Children of the Drug War: Perspectives on the Impact of Drug Policies on Young People. The International Debate Education Association, New York, 2011, 241 pp, ISBN: 978-1-61770-018-7

Family Relationships and Adolescent Well-Being: Are Families Equally Protective for Same-Sex Attracted Youth?

James W. Messerschmidt: Gender, heterosexuality, and youth violence: The struggle for recognition

Sexual Minority-Related Victimization as a Mediator of Mental Health Disparities in Sexual Minority Youth: A Longitudinal Analysis

Associations Between Adolescents’ Perceived Discrimination and Prosocial Tendencies: The Mediating Role of Mexican American Values