Abstract
Neighborhoods matter for youth; yet, most literature focuses on neighborhood deficits rather than strengths. To understand how best to capture neighborhoods, this study used census- and perception-based measures of neighborhood characteristics as suggested by social disorganization and pluralistic neighborhood theories, respectively, to determine the association between structural characteristics and perceptions of positive and negative neighborhood characteristics. The ethnically diverse (59% White and 34% African American) sample (N = 1,414) consisted of early adolescents (53% female) and their mothers. We found that participants perceived distinct positive and negative neighborhood characteristics. For adolescents and mothers, neighborhood structural characteristics were positively associated with risk perceptions (e.g., physical and social disorder) but differently associated with positive neighborhood characteristics. In addition, participants perceived their neighborhoods differently (e.g., adolescents perceived less informal social control but more cohesion than their mothers). We discuss the importance of the neighborhood context, particularly positive neighborhood characteristics, for rural families.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aber, J. L. (1994). Poverty, violence, and child development: Untangling family and community level effects. In C. A. Nelson (Ed.), The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Vol 27. Threats to optimal development: Integrating biological, psychological, and social risk factors (pp. 229–272). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Aber, M. S., & Nieto, M. (2000). Suggestions for the investigation of psychological wellness in the neighborhood context: Toward a pluarlistic neighborhood theory. In D. Cicchetti, J. Rappaport, I. Sandler, & R. Weissberg (Eds.), The promotion of wellness in children and adolescents (pp. 185–220). Washington, DC: CWLA Press.
Allison, K. W., Burton, L., Marshall, S., Perez-Fables, A., Yarrington, J., Kirsch, L., et al. (1999). Life experiences among urban adolescents: Examining the role of context. Child Development, 70(4), 1017–1029.
Aneshensel, C. S., & Sucoff, C. A. (1996). The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 293–310.
Barber, B., & Olsen, J. (1997). Socialization in context: Connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family, school, and neighborhood, and with peers. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 287–315.
Brody, G. H., Ge, X., Conger, R., Gibbons, F. X., Murry, V. M., et al. (2001). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children’s affiliation with deviant peers. Child Development, 72(4), 1231–1246.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Burton, L. M., Price-Spratlen, T., & Spencer, M. B. (1997). On ways of thinking about measuring neighborhoods: Implications for studying context and developmental outcomes for children. In J. Brooks-Gunn, G. J. Duncan, & J. L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Policy implications in studying neighborhoods (pp. 132–144). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cantillon, D. (2006). Community social organization, parents, and peers as mediators of perceived neighborhood block characteristics on delinquent and prosocial activities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37(1/2), 111–127.
Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1990). Separate lives: Why siblings are so different. New York: Basic Books.
Elder, G. H., & Conger, R. D. (2000). Children of the land: Adversity and success in rural America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., Faris, R., Foshee, V. A., DuRant, R. H., et al. (2006). The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(2), 159–186.
Furstenberg, F. F., Cook, T. D., Eccles, J., Elder, G. H., & Sameroff, A. (1999). Managing to make it: Urban families and adolescent success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gifford-Smith, M., Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & McCord, J. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 255–265.
Hoyle, R. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn & M. F. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.
Meyers, S. A., & Miller, C. (2004). Direct, mediated, moderated, and cumulative relations between neighborhood characteristics and adolescent outcomes. Adolescence, 39(153), 121–144.
O’Neill, R., Parke, R. D., & McDowell, D. J. (2001). Objective and subjective features of children’s neighborhoods: Relations to parental regulatory strategies and children’s social competence. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 135–155.
Osgood, D. W., & Chambers, J. M. (2000). Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 38(1), 81–115.
Plunkett, S. W., Abarca-Mortensen, S., Behnke, A. O., & Sands, T. (2007). Neighborhood structural qualities, adolescents’ perceptions of neighborhoods, and Latino youth development. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 29(1), 19–34.
Quane, J. M., & Rankin, B. H. (2006). Does it pay to participate? Neighborhood-based organizations and the social development of urban adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(10), 1229–1250.
Ricketts, T. C., Johnson-Webb, K. D., & Randolph, R. K. (1999). Populations and places in rural America. In T. C. Ricketts (Ed.), Rural health in the United States (pp. 7–24). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ross, C. E., & Jang, S. J. (2000). Neighborhood disorder, fear, and mistrust: The buffering role of social ties with neighbors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(4), 401–420.
Sampson, R. J. (2001). How do communities undergrid or undermine human development? Relevant contexts and social mechanisms. In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Does it take a village? Community effects on children, adolescents, and family (pp. 3–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
Seidman, S., Yoshikawa, H., Roberts, A., Chesir-Teran, D., Allen, L., Friedman, J., et al. (1998). Structural and experiential neighborhood contexts, developmental stage, and antisocial behavior among urban adolescents in poverty. Developmental and Psychopathology, 10(2), 259–281.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). American FactFinder Fact Sheet. Retrieved June 10, 2009 from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/SAFFFacts?_event=Search&geo_id.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, W. J. (1993). The underclass: Issues, perspectives, and public policy. In W. J. Wilson (Ed.), The Ghetto underclass: Social science Perspectives (pp. 1–24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Acknowledgments
The research for this article was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (R01 DA13459) to the second author; the first author’s work was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5 T32 HD007376).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Witherspoon, D., Ennett, S. An Examination of Social Disorganization and Pluralistic Neighborhood Theories with Rural Mothers and Their Adolescents. J Youth Adolescence 40, 1243–1253 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9499-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9499-4