Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-conceptualizing the Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale This study attempted to differentiate statistically the spiritual and religious factors of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS), which was developed based on theoretical conceptualizations that have yet to be adequately empirically validated in a population with significant health disorders. Participants One hundred sixty-four individuals with heterogeneous medical conditions [i.e., brain injury, spinal cord injury (SCI), cancer, stroke, primary care conditions]. Methods Participants completed the BMMRS as part of a pilot study on spirituality, religion, and physical and mental health. Results A principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization identified a six-factor solution (opposed to the expected 8-factor solution) accounting for 60% of the variance in scores, labeled as: (1) Positive Spiritual Experience; (2) Negative Spiritual Experience; (3) Forgiveness; (4) Religious Practices; (5) Positive Congregational Support; and (6) Negative Congregational Support. Conclusions The results suggest the BMMRS assesses distinct positive and negative aspects of religiousness and spirituality that may be best conceptualized in a psychoneuroimmunological context as measuring: (a) Spiritual Experiences (i.e., emotional experience of feeling connected with a higher power/the universe); (b) Religious Practices (i.e., prayer, rituals, service attendance); (c) Congregational Support; and (d) Forgiveness (i.e., a specific coping strategy that can be conceptualized as religious or non-religious in context).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443. doi:10.1037/h0021212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. W., Keefe, F. J., Goli, V., Fras, A. M., Lynch, T. R., Thorp, S. R., et al. (2005). Forgiveness and chronic low back pain: A preliminary study examining the relationship of forgiveness to pain, anger, and psychological distress. Journal of Pain, 6, 84–91. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2004.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R., Pryzbeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The temperament and character inventory. St. Louis: Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. B., & Hill, P. C. (2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75, 709–742. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00454.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. (2005). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), The handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 315–330). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitchett, G., Rybarczyk, B. D., DeMarco, G. A., & Nicholas, J. J. (1999). The role of religion in medical rehabilitation outcomes: A longitudinal study. Rehabilitation Psychology, 44, 333–353. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.44.4.333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, L. K., Ellison, C. G., & Larson, D. B. (2002). Exploring the relationships between religious involvement and health. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 190–200. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1303_04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackney, C. L., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43–55. doi:10.1111/1468-5906.t01-1-00160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T., Hanks, R., Bogner, J. A., Millis, S., & Esselman, P. (2007). Blame attribution in intentional and unintentional traumatic brain injury. Longitudinal changes and impact on subjective well being. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 152–161. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.52.2.152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C., & Hood, R., Jr. (Eds.) (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idler, E. L., Musick, M. A., Ellison, C. G., et al. (2003). Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research on Aging, 25(4), 327–365. doi:10.1177/0164027503025004001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S., Liu, X. Q., Gardner, C. O., McCullough, M. E., Larson, D., & Prescott, C. A. (2003). Dimensions of religiosity and their relationship to lifetime psychiatric and substance use disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(3), 496–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (1966). Measuring the religious variable: Nine proposed dimensions. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 173–190. doi:10.2307/1384880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (1995). The royal free interview for religious and spiritual beliefs: Development and standardization. Psychological Medicine, 25, 1125–1134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (1998). The spiritual variable in psychiatric research. Psychological Medicine, 28, 259–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (1999). The effect of spiritual beliefs on outcome from illness. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1291–1299. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98) 00452-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Hunt, R. (1967). Dimensions of religiosity in “measuring the religious variable”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 173–190. doi:10.2307/1384044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Hunt, R. (1969). Measuring the religious variable: Amended findings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 8, 321–323. doi:10.2307/1384345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Hunt, R. (1972). Measuring the religious variable: Replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 240–266. doi:10.2307/1384548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Hunt, R. (1975). Measuring the religious variable: National replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 13–22. doi:10.2307/1384452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. E., & Hunt, R. A. (1990). Measuring the religious variable: Final comment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(4), 531–535. doi:10.2307/1387319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 194–197. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging research field. The American Psychologist, 58, 24–35. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mokuau, N., Hishinuma, E., & Nishimura, S. (2001). Validating a measure of religousness/spirituality for Native Hawaiians. Pacific Health Dialog, 8(2), 407–416.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, J. A. (2006). Exploring the dimensionality of “religiosity” and “spirituality” in the Fetzer Multidimensional Measure. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(3), 449–459. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00318.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology religion and coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I. (1999). Religious/spiritual coping. In Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for use in Health Research. A report of a national working group supported by Fetzer Institute in collaboration with the National Institute on Aging (pp. 43–56). Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute.

  • Pargament, K., Koenig, H., & Perez, L. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., & Rye, M. (1998). Forgiveness as a method of religious coping. In E. L. Worthington, Jr (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 59–78). Philadephia, PA: The Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, M. J., Little, T. D., & Perez, J. E. (2003). Religiousness and depressive symptoms among adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(2), 267–276. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3202_12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L., Mapa, A. T., & Williams, J. E. G. (2007). A factor analysis of the Fetzer/NIA brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 17, 177–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, L. H., Shahabi, L., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Religion and spirituality. Linkages to physical health. The American Psychologist, 58(1), 36–52. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, O. (2004). How the mind hurts and heals the body. The American Psychologist, 59(1), 29–40. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, R. P., Bagiella, E., & Powell, T. (1999). Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet, 353, 664–667. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98) 07376-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C., & Koeske, G. F. (2006). A preliminary construct validation of the multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality instrument:: A study of southern USA samples. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16(3), 181–196. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr1603_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, L., & Teresi, J. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R. (1994). The measurement of religion in epidemiologic studies: Problems and prospects. In J. S. Levin (Ed.), Religion in aging and health: Theoretical foundations of methodological frontiers (pp. 125–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, D. P., & Lee, E. O. (2004). Religiousness/spirituality and subjective well-being among rural elderly Whites, African Americans, and Native Americans. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 10(1), 191–211. doi:10.1300/J137v10n01_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinnbauer, B. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 21–42). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article was supported with funding from the Center on Religion and the Professions at the University of Missouri-Columbia, funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brick Johnstone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnstone, B., Yoon, D.P., Franklin, K.L. et al. Re-conceptualizing the Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality. J Relig Health 48, 146–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9

Keywords

Navigation