Skip to main content
Log in

Content Analyses of the Beliefs of Academic Procrastinators

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although relevant nomothetically-based personality literature has made great advances in recent years correlating traits to measures of procrastination, little is known about the specific irrational beliefs of procrastinators, especially when they are actively avoiding tasks or situations. Based on theories from Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), it was hypothesized that compared to non-procrastinators, college student academic procrastinators would show greater self depreciation, greater other depreciation, greater life condition depreciation, and a lower frustration tolerance. Academic procrastination was operationally defined by quartile distributions on two self- report measures and three classroom-based assignments. Procrastinators and non-procrastinating students were given instructions to write approximately 500 words about their thoughts and feelings while they were in the process of actively putting off a specific, real event. While actually procrastinating, students logged on to a web site and made text entries describing what was going through their minds. Data were analyzed with the Psychiatric Content and Diagnosis Program Version 3 (PCAD 3; Gottschalk and Bechtel in Psychiatric content and diagnosis: the PCAD 3. GB Software, Brighton, MI, 2007). Procrastinators and non-procrastinators differed on relevant PCAD scales, supporting the hypotheses derived from REBT theory. Treatment implications and directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In a pilot study we found four factors, one of which appeared to be a general factor, two appeared to be method factors and the last factor was uninterruptable. The first factor in this pilot sample accounted for about 48% of the variance. Factor loadings combining questionnaire and behavioral data may be influenced by when in the academic year data was collected and whether students have received recent positive or negative feedback about classroom performance.

References

  • Dryden, W. (2009). Rational emotive behaviour therapy: Distinctive features. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (1990). The essential Albert Ellis: Seminal writings on psychotherapy. New York: Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (1997). The practice of rational emotive behavior therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L., & McCown, W. G. (1995). Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, L. A. (1985). Hope and other deterrents to illness. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 39(4), 515–524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, L., & Bechtel, R. (2007). Psychiatric content and diagnosis: The PCAD 3. Brighton, MI: GB Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, L., & Gleser, G. (1969). The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior. Oxford: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröpel, P., & Steel, P. (2008). A mega-trial investigation of goal setting, interest enhancement, and energy on procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(5), 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, N. (2007). Frustration intolerance as a multidimensional concept. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 25(3), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoigaard, J. C. (2008). The content analysis of verbal behavior in psychotherapy sessions: Machine scoring vs. hand scoring. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzman, P. S. (1964). On procrastinating. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 46(1), 98–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbinder, F. C. (2006). Psychodynamics and executive dysfunction: A neurobiological perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 34(4), 515–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knaus, W. (1973). Overcoming procrastination. Rational Living, 8(2), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaus, W. (2002). The procrastination workbook: Your personalized program for breaking free from the patterns that hold you back. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, C. H. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality, 20(4), 474–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lay, C. H. (2004). Some basic elements in counseling procrastinators. In H. C. Schouwenburg, C. H. Lay, T. A. Pychyl, & J. R. Ferrari (Eds.), Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings (pp. 43–58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDermut, W., & Haaga, D. A. F. (2009). Assessment and diagnostic issues in rational emotive behavior therapy: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 27(2), 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neenan, M. (2008). Tackling procrastination: An REBT perspective for coaches. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 26(1), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pychyl, T. A., & Binder, K. (2004). A project-analytic perspective on academic procrastination and intervention. In H. C. Schouwenburg, C. H. Lay, T. A. Pychyl, & J. R. Ferrari (Eds.), Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings (pp. 149–165). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schostrom, E. (1965). Three approaches to psychotherapy. Orange County, CA: Psychological Films, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trip, S., Vernon, A., & McMahon, J. (2007). Effectiveness of rational-emotive education: A quantitative meta-analytical study. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 7(1), 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (2004). Behavioral interventions for reducing procrastination among university students. In H. C. Schouwenburg, C. H. Lay, T. A. Pychyl, & J. R. Ferrari (Eds.), Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings (pp. 91–103). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Eerde, W. (2003). A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1410–1418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bill McCown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCown, B., Blake, I.K. & Keiser, R. Content Analyses of the Beliefs of Academic Procrastinators. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 30, 213–222 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-012-0148-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-012-0148-6

Keywords

Navigation