Skip to main content
Log in

Retaining Ethnic Minority Parents in a Preventive Intervention: The Quality of Group Process

  • Published:
Journal of Primary Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This study examined relations between group process variables and retention of ethnic minority (African American and Hispanic) caregivers in a family-focused preventive intervention. Data from the Familias Unidas/SEPI project (Coatsworth, Pantin, & Szapocznik, 2002), a randomized, controlled intervention trial, were used to cluster participants according to their patterns of retention over 30 intervention sessions. These person-centered analyses identified three broad patterns: (a) dropouts; (b) variable-attenders; and (c) consistent-high-attenders. Two subgroups of the variable-attender group were also identified: (a) intermittent-attenders, and (b) continual-attenders. Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) with follow-up Analysis of Variance tested for differences among the three main retention groups on facilitator ratings of participants’ general level of participation, leadership, positive alliance with the group, and negative alliance with the group during the first half of the intervention. Leadership and positive alliance significantly discriminated the broad retention patterns. Mean level of participation was not significantly different across retention groups. Results of DFA and ANOVA analyses using leadership, alliance, and participation variables from the first and second halves of the intervention indicated only leadership and positive alliance during the second half of the intervention discriminated continual-attenders from intermittent-attenders.

Editors’ Strategic Implications: The authors describe a promising approach to studying facilitators’ assessments of client involvement in a family-focused preventive intervention. The quality of the participants’ behavior during sessions, rather than their absolute levels of participation, predicted their pattern of retention in the program. Future comparisons of facilitator and parent views may prove helpful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This cutpoint of 60% corresponds roughly to the rates of parent participation in the Fast Track study (Orrell-Valente et al., 1999) and to the average number of sessions attended by families in the Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers (LIFT) intervention conducted by the Oregon Social Learning Center (Reid et al., 1999).

REFERENCES

  • August, G. J., Realmuto, G. M., Hektner, J. M., & Bloomquist, M. L. (2001). An integrated components preventive intervention for aggressive elementary school children: The Early Risers program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 614–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baydar, N., Reid, M. J., & Webster-Stratton, C. (2003). The role of mental health factors and program engagement in the effectiveness of a preventive parenting program for Head Start mothers. Child Development, 74, 1433–1453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. P. (1981). The study of group phase development and emergent leadership. Group, 5, 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. P., Dugo, J. M., Eng, A. M., & Lewis, C. M. (1986). The search for phases in group development: Designing process analysis measures of group interaction. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 615–680). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. P., & Lewis, C. M. (2000). Comparison of the systems of analysis: Concepts and theory. In A. P. Beck & C. M. Lewis (Eds.), The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing change (pp. 415–441). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. (1998). A pattern-oriented approach to studying individual development: Snapshots and processes. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 83–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budman, S. H., Soldz, S., Demby, A., Davis, M. S., & Merry, J. (1993). What is cohesiveness? An empirical examination. Small Group Research, 24, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budman, S. H., Soldz, S., Demby, A., Feldstein, M., Springer, T., & Davis, M. S. (1989). Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 52, 339–350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Mosier, J. (2003). The differential effectiveness of group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic perspective. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Family Studies, (1996). CFS Pre-Intervention Screening Instrument. Unpublished manuscript, University of Miami.

  • Charlebois, P., Vitaro, F., Normandeau, N., Brendgen, M., & Rondeau, R. (2004). Trainers’ behavior and participants’ persistence in a longitudinal preventive intervention for disruptive boys. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coatsworth, J. D., Duncan, L. G., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2006). Patterns of retention in a preventive intervention with ethnic minority families. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 171–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coatsworth, J. D., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2002). Familias Unidas: A family-centered ecodevelopmental intervention to reduce risk for problem behavior among Hispanic adolescents. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 113–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coatsworth, J. D., Santisteban, D. A., McBride, C. K., & Szapocznik, J. (2001). Brief strategic family therapy versus community control: Engagement, retention, and an exploration of the moderating role of adolescent symptom severity. Family Process, 40, 313–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J., Watt, N., Hawkins, S., Ramey, S., Markman, H., Long, B., et al. (1991, June). Prevention research: Conceptual model of strategies and procedures. Paper presented at the National Prevention Conference sponsored by NIMH, Washington, DC.

  • Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2004). A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 5, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University Empowerment Group. (1989). Empowerment through family support. Networking Bulletin, 1(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). Intervening with adolescent problem behavior: A family-centered approach. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. (1999). The antecedents of team competence: Toward a fine-grained model of self- managing team effectiveness. In R. Wageman (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Context, vol. 2 (pp. 201–231). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumka, L. E., Garza, C. A., Roosa, M. W., & Stoerzinger, H. D. (1997). Recruitment and retention of high risk families into a preventive parent training intervention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, C. A., Fleischman, A. R., McCarton, C., Meltzer, A., & Ruff, H. (1988). A neonatal preventive intervention study: Issues of recruitment and retention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 9, 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1983). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. P., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2003). Differentiating completers from non-completers of a family-based prevention program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, L., Thompson, L., Gallagher, D., Cornoyer, L. G., & Gagnon, R. (1998). Alliance, technique, and their interactions in predicting outcome of behavioral, cognitive and brief dynamic therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 190–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman-Smith, D., Tolan, P. H., Henry, D. B., Leventhal, A. (2002). Predictors of participation in a family focused preventive-intervention for substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(4S), S55–S64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, L. R. (2000). Process analysis of group interaction in therapeutic groups. In A. P. Beck & C. M. Lewis (Eds.), The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing change (pp. 23–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D., Julion, W., & Fogg, L. (2001). What motivates participation and dropout among low-income urban families of color in a prevention intervention? Family Relations, 50, 246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, A. W., & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (pp. 39–51). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1997). Effective recruitment for parenting programs within ethnic minority communities. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 14, 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2004). Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. In M. J. Lambert, A. E. Bergin, & S. L. Garfield (Eds.) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 5th ed., (pp. 72–113). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagwood, K. E. (2005). Family-based services in children’s mental health: A research review and synthesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 690–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., Stolar, M. J., & Marciano, P. L. (1995). Risk factors for dropping out of treatment among white and black families. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 402–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., & Alvarado, R. (2003). Family-strengthening approaches for the prevention of youth problem behaviors. American Psychologist, 58, 457–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. M., Beck, A. P., Dugo, J. M., & Eng, A. M. (2000). The group development process and analysis measure. In A. P. Beck & C. M. Lewis (Eds.), The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing change (pp. 221–261). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. A., Yalom, I. D., & Miles, M. B. (1973). Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marziali, E., Munroe-Blum, H., & McCleary, L. (1997). The contribution of group cohesion and group alliance to the outcome of group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 47, 475–497.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, M., Piper, W. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., & Joyce, A. S. (2002). Early process and dropping out from short-term group therapy for complicated grief. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6, 243–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. M., Gonzalez, J., Stone, S., Ryland, D., & Kohner, K. (1995). Multiple family therapy groups: A responsive intervention model for inner city families. Social Work with Groups, 18, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. M., Gonzales, J., Quintana, E., Kim, L., & Abdul-Adil, J. (1999). Multiple family groups: An alternative for reducing disruptive behavioral difficulties of urban children. Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. M., McCadam, K., & Gonzales, J. (1996). Addressing the barriers to mental health services for inner city children and their caretakers. Community Mental Health Journal, 32, 353–361.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orrell-Valente, J., Pinderhughes, E., Valente, E., Laird, R., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). If it’s offered, will they come? Influences on parents’ participation in community-based conduct problems prevention program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 753–783.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pantin, H., Coatsworth, J. D., Feaster, D. J., Newman, F. L., Briones, E., Prado, G. et al. (2003). Familias Unidas: The efficacy of an intervention to increase parental investment in Hispanic immigrant families. Prevention Science, 4, 189–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pantin, H., Schwartz, S., Sullivan, S., Coatsworth, J. D., & Szapocznik, J. (2003). Preventing substance abuse in Hispanic immigrant adolescents: An ecodevelopmental, parent-centered approach. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 469–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, A. T. (2001). Informal leaders and the development of group efficacy. Small Group Research, 32, 74–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, A. T. (2002). Emergent leaders and managers of group emotion. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W. E., Marrache, M., Lacroix, R., Richardson, M., & Jones, B. D. (1983). Cohesion as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., Joyce, A. S., McCallum, M., Rosie, J. S., O’Kelly, J. G. et al. (1999). Prediction of dropping out in time-limited, interpretive individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 36, 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrino, T., Coatsworth, J. D., Briones, E., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2001). Initial engagement to parent-centered prevention interventions: A family systems perspective. Journal of Primary Prevention, 22, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, R. J., Smith, E. P., Dumas, J. E., Laughlin, J. E., White, D. W., & Barron, R. (2001). Recruitment and retention of participants in prevention trials involving family-based interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 31–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, R. J., & Miller, G. E. (1996). Parental engagement in interventions for children at risk for conduct disorder. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Prevention and early intervention: Childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency (pp. 161–183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. B., Eddy, J. M., Fetrow, R. A., & Stoolmiller, M. (1999). Description and immediate impacts of a preventive intervention for conduct problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 483–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. S., Alexander, J. F., & Turner, C. W. (2000). Disrupting defensive family interactions in family therapy with delinquent adolescents. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 688–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. S., Turner, C. W., Alexander, J. F., & Perez, G. A., (2003). Alliance and dropout in family therapy for adolescents with behavior problems: Individual and systemic effects. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 534–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soldz, S., Budman, S., & Demby, A. (1992). The relationship between main actors behaviors and treatment outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldz, S., Budman, S., Demby, A., & Feldstein, M. (1990). Patient activity and outcome in group psychotherapy: New findings. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 40, 53–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. L., Kavanagh, K. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2002). Family-centered preventive intervention science: Toward benefits to larger populations of children, youth, and families. Prevention Science, 3(3), 145–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Goldberg, C., & Redmond, C. (1999). Engaging families in longitudinal preventive intervention research: Discrete time survival analysis of socioeconomic and social-emotional risk factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 157–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2000). Research on family engagement in preventive interventions: Toward improved use of scientific findings in primary prevention practice. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Hockaday, C., & Shin, C. (1996). Barriers to participation in family skills preventive interventions and their evaluations: A replication and extension. Family Relations, 45, 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Kahn, J., & Shin, C. (1997). A prospective validation study of inclination, belief, and context predictors of family-focused prevention involvement. Family Process, 36, 403–429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Lepper, H. (1999). Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: One- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supp13, 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2000). Modeling factors influencing enrollment in family-focused preventive intervention research. Prevention Science, 1, 213–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1999). An ecodevelopmental framework for organizing risk and protection for drug abuse: A developmental model of risk and protection. In M. Glantz & C. R. Hartel (Eds.), Drug abuse: Origins and interventions (pp. 331–366). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th edition). New York: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolan, P. H., Hanish, L. D., McKay, M. M., & Dickey, M. H. (2002). Evaluating process in child and family intervention: Aggression prevention as an example. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 220–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Stratton, C., & Herbert, M. (1994). Troubled families- problem children. Working with parents: A collaborative process. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2001). Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: A parent and teacher training partnership in Head Start. Journal of Community-Psychology, 30, 283–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, M. F. (1993). Role of the leader in group psychotherapy. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive group psychotherapy 3rd ed. (pp. 84–98). Baltimore, MD: Wilkins & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy 4th ed.. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was funded by Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Grant 1 UR6 SPO7961 to José Szapocznik, Principal Investigator. We thank the families who participated and the three facilitators who led the intervention groups: Cecilia Ferro, Dolores Perdomo, and Monica Zarate.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Douglas Coatsworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coatsworth, J.D., Duncan, L.G., Pantin, H. et al. Retaining Ethnic Minority Parents in a Preventive Intervention: The Quality of Group Process. J Primary Prevent 27, 367–389 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-006-0043-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-006-0043-y

KEY WORDS:

Navigation