Skip to main content
Log in

A Systemic Model of the Youth Mentoring Intervention

  • Published:
Journal of Primary Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conceptual and empirical work on youth mentoring naturally tends to focus on the relationship between mentor and child. However, the parent/guardian and agency caseworker also may contribute to the success or failure of the mentoring intervention, and program effects may be partially mediated by the child’s interactions with these individuals. This article presents a systemic model of mentoring depicting the interdependent network of relationships established between mentor, child, parent/guardian, and caseworker against the backdrop of agency policies and procedures. Numerous examples illustrate pathways of influence and patterns of communication in the context of this more holistic model of mentoring.

Editors’ Strategic Implications: Drawing upon ecological and systems theories, the author provides a promising conceptual model that focuses on patterns of interpersonal exchange among several key individuals (but not the only possible ones). This model reminds researchers and practitioners that mentoring resides within a mutually reinforcing (or inhibiting) network of other relationships. This systemic thinking has implications for child welfare agency policies and practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, J., & Hinde, R. A. (1988). Triadic interactions: Mother–first-born–second-born. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influences (pp. 181–190). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach (Vol. 4). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Crouter, A. C. (1983). The evolution of environmental models in developmental research. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. I. History, theory, and methods (4th ed., pp. 357–414). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, N., Hamilton, S. F., & Niego, S. (1994). Adolescents’ relations with adults outside the family. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (Vol. 6, pp. 216–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, J. E., Hagan, M. S., Bass, B., Hetherington, E. M., & Clingempeel, G. (1999). Marital interaction in dyadic and triadic contexts: Continuities and discontinuities. Family Process, 38(1), 105–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, D. L., Neville, H. A., Parra, G. R., & Pugh-Lilly, A. O. (2002). Testing a new model of mentoring. In J. E. Rhodes (Ed.), A critical view of youth mentoring (pp. 21–57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. (1993). The kindness of strangers: Adult mentors, urban youth, and the new voluntarism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furano, K., Roaf, P. A., Styles, M. B., & Branch, A. Y. (1993). Big Brothers/Big Sisters: A study of program practices. Philadelphia: Public Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde, P. F. (1986). The interpersonal structure of family interaction settings: Parent–adolescent relations in dyads and triads. Developmental Psychology, 22(3), 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 199–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W., & Laursen, B. (1999). Relationships as developmental contexts: Retrospective themes and contemporary issues. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts (Vol. 30, pp. 13–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Y. (1983). Human service organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451–477). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, T. E. (in press). The stages and development of mentoring relationships. In D. L. DuBois & M. Karcher (Eds.), The handbook of youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Kerig, P. K., & Lindahl, K. M. (Eds.). (2001). Family observational coding systems: Resources for systemic research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavigueur, S., Tremblay, R. E., & Saucier, J.-F. (1995). Interactional processes in families with disruptive boys: Patterns of direct and indirect influence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23(3), 359–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LoSciuto, L., Rajala, A. K., Townsend, T. N., & Taylor, A. S. (1996). An outcome evaluation of Across Ages: An intergenerational mentoring approach to drug prevention. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(1), 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissen, G. J., & Lounsbury, J. W. (1981). A comparison of expectations of volunteers, children, and parents in a Big Brother Big Sister program. Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 250–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. (2003). Elements of effective practice (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family development. Child Development, 56, 289–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, K. V., & Styles, M. B. (1995). Building relationships with youth in program settings. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra, G. R., DuBois, D. L., Neville, H. A., Pugh-Lilly, A. O., & Povinelli, N. (2002). Mentoring relationships for youth: Investigation of a process-oriented model. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 844–872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, J. E., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, N. L. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. Child Development, 71(6), 1662–1671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1990). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In J. Rolf, A. S. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. H. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameroff, A. J. (1983). Developmental systems: Contexts and evolution. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. I. History, theory, and methods (4th ed., pp. 237–294). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, I. N., Miller, P., Short, J., & Wolchik, S. A. (1989). Social support as a protective factor for children in stress. In D. Belle (Ed.), Children’s social networks and social support (pp. 277–307). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, C. L. (2002). Mentoring programs for adolescents: A research summary. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 251–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, C. L., & Roder, A. E. (1999). Mentoring school-age children: A classification of programs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, L. A., & Fleeson, J. (1986). Attachment and the construction of relationships. In W. Hartup & Z. Rubin (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 51–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles, M. B., & Morrow, K. V. (1992). Understanding how youth and elders form relationships: A study of four Linking Lifetimes programs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, J. P., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, J. (1995). Making a difference: An impact study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas E. Keller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, T.E. A Systemic Model of the Youth Mentoring Intervention. J Primary Prevent 26, 169–188 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1850-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1850-2

Keyword

Navigation