Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental Mentoring Match Characteristics: Correspondence between Mentors’ and Mentees’ Assessments of Relationship Quality

  • Published:
Journal of Primary Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the factors that contribute to high-quality mentoring relationships is critical to developing and sustaining effective mentoring programs. In study 1, sixty-three adolescent mentors, from two high schools, were surveyed four to six weeks after being matched with elementary-age mentees. Hierarchical regression models revealed that mentees’ academic and behavioral risk status, parental involvement, and program quality all explained variance in mentor-perceived relationship quality, but none remained significant predictors after mentors’ self-efficacy, motivations for self-enhancement, and assessments of their mentees’ support seeking behaviors were accounted for. Study 2 cross-validates the regression model in study 1 and examines the concurrent validity and predictive validity of a measure of mentoring match characteristics using mid-year and end-of-year assessments from mentees and mentors.

Editors’ Strategic Implications: The focus on mentors’ initial impressions of their mentees and the relationship represents a novel contribution to the study of relationship formation and persistence. The authors provide a promising strategy – and descriptions of specific measures – to help programs study relationships that endure or terminate. Coordinators will benefit from the knowledge that if mentors feel efficacious and if the mentoring relationship is strong, mentors are more likely to persist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aseltine, R. H., Dupre, M., & Lamlein, P. (2000). Mentoring as a drug prevention strategy: An evaluation of Across Ages. Adolescent and Family Health, 1,(1), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainer, D. L., & Didham, C. (1994). Mentoring and other support behaviors in elementary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 87(4), 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blechman, E. A. (1992). Mentors for high-risk minority youth: From effective communication to bicultural competence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21(2), 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blocher, K. M. (1993). Factors in sustaining adult voluntary mentoring relationships with at-risk youth. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(6-A).

  • Blum, D. J., & Jones, L. A. (1993). Academic growth group and mentoring program for potential dropouts. School Counselor, 40(3), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, C., & Colson, S. (1984). Mentoring: An effective career guidance technique. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 32(3), 192–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron-Jones, M. O., & Hara, P. (1995). Mentors’ perceptions of their roles with students in initial teacher training. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(2), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clary, E. G., & Orenstein, L. (1991). The amount and effectiveness of help: The relationship of motives and abilities to helping behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(1), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J, & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 1516–1530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. A., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diem, R. A. (1991). Dealing with the tip of the iceberg: School responses to at risk behaviors. High School Journal, 75(2), 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, D. L., & Neville, H. A. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 291–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. (1993). The kindness of strangers: Adult mentors, urban youth, and the new volunteerism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Program. Evaluation Review, 22(3), 403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 199–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. T., & Nakkula, M. J. (1999). Match Characteristics Questionnaire (MCQ). Unpublished measure, Harvard Graduate School of Education.

  • Karcher, M. J. (1999). Developmental mentoring in the schools: A manual for program implementation and evaluation. Unpublished manual, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Karcher, M. J., Davis, C., & Powell, B. (2002). Developmental mentoring in the schools: Testing connectedness as a mediating variable in the promotion of academic achievement. The School Community Journal, 12(2), 36–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karcher, M. J. & Lindwall, J. (2003). Social interest, connectedness, and challenging experiences: What makes high school mentors’ persist? Journal of Individual Psychology, 59, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoSciuto, L., Rajala, A. K., Townsend, T. N., & Taylor, A. S. (1996). An outcome evaluation of Across Ages: An intergenerational mentoring approach to drug prevention. Special Issue: Preventing adolescent substance abuse. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(1), 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. (2001). Do I matter? Construct validation of adolescents’ perceived mattering to parents and friends. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 473–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, K., & Styles, M. (1995). Building relationships with youth in program settings: A study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, V. (1997). Cross-age mentoring program for social skills development. The School Counselor, 44, 239–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, J. E. (1994). Older and wiser: Mentoring relationships in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Primary Prevention, 14, 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, J. E., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, N. L. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. Child Development, 71(6), 1662–1671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). What do adolescents need for healthy development: Implications for youth policy. SRCD Social Policy Report, 14(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, C. L. (2000). Mentoring adolescents: What have we learned? Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

  • Slicker, E. K., & Palmer, D. J. (1993). Mentoring at-risk high school students: Evaluation of a school-based program. School Counselor, 40(5), 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stukas, A. A., Clary, G. E., & Snyder, M. (2000). Service learning: Who benefits and why. Social Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 13(4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education (1996). Mentoring in schools. In Creating safe and healthy schools: An action guide. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L., & Borland, J. H. (1992). A special friend: Adolescent mentors for young, economically disadvantaged, potentially gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Karcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karcher, M.J., Nakkula, M.J. & Harris, J. Developmental Mentoring Match Characteristics: Correspondence between Mentors’ and Mentees’ Assessments of Relationship Quality. J Primary Prevent 26, 93–110 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1847-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1847-x

Keyword

Navigation