Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Do Women Value Work Shortly After Breast Cancer Surgery and Are Their Valuations Associated With Being on Sick Leave?

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose To investigate how working women, in different age and educational groups who have recently had breast cancer surgery, value work (in terms of importance, satisfaction, and dedication), and whether their valuations are associated with sick leave. Method This cross-sectional study investigated the value of work and its relation to sickness absence among women in Sweden who had had breast cancer surgery, were aged 20–63 years, and worked before diagnosis (n = 605). A questionnaire was distributed at inclusion, about 4–8 weeks after surgery. Inferential statistics and logistic regression were used to estimate odds ratio (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results Two-thirds of the women viewed work as one of the most important things in their lives; 86 % stated that their job provided personal satisfaction; and 54 % rated their vocational situation as satisfying. Older women (≥52 years) were more vocationally satisfied (p = 0.021), as too were those with higher education (p = 0.035). Women with higher education were also more dedicated to their work (p = 0.020). Univariate analyses revealed associations of low vocational satisfaction, younger age and wanting to change profession with sickness absence. Low vocational satisfaction (OR 2.38, 95 % CI 1.66–3.41) and younger age (<52 years) (OR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.02–2.03) remained associated with sick leave in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions Shortly after breast cancer surgery, most women valued work highly, even as one of the most important things in their lives. Accordingly, it is essential to include aspects of work early on in these patients’ treatment and rehabilitation plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jahoda M. Work, employment and unemployment. Values, theories and approaches in social research. Am Psychol. 1981;36(2):184–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Waddell G, Burton K. Is work good for your health and well-being?. London: TSO; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnsson A, et al. Factors influencing return to work: a narrative study of women treated for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19(3):317–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rasmussen DM, Elverdam B. The meaning of work and working life after cancer: an interview study. Psychooncology. 2008;17(12):1232–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy F, et al. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16(1):17–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Munir F, et al. Women’s perceptions of chemotherapy-induced cognitive side affects on work ability: a focus group study. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(9–10):1362–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maunsell E, et al. Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(24):1813–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drolet M, et al. Not working 3 years after breast cancer: predictors in a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(33):8305–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parkin DM, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cancer in Sweden (in Swedish). 2011. Socialstyrelsen: Stockholm.

  11. Pinto AC, de Azambuja E. Improving quality of life after breast cancer: dealing with symptoms. Maturitas. 2011;70(4):343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Denieffe S, Gooney M. A meta-synthesis of women’s symptoms experience and breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20(4):424–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fantoni S, et al. Factors related to return to work by women with breast cancer in Northern France. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):49–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsson M, et al. Return to work after breast cancer: patients’ experiences of encounters with different stakeholders. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15:267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tiedtke C, et al. Supporting return-to-work in the face of legislation: stakeholders’ experiences with return-to-work after breast cancer in Belgium. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):241–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berg Gudbergsson S, Fosså S, Dahl A. Is cancer survivorship associated with reduced work engagement? A NOCWO Study. J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2(3):159–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hakanen JJ, Lindbohm ML. Work engagement among breast cancer survivors and the referents: the importance of optimism and social resources at work. J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2(4):283–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Høyer M, et al. Change in working time in a population-based cohort of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(23):2853–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clausen T, Christensen KB, Borg V. Positive work-related states and long-term sickness absence: a study of register-based outcomes. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(Suppl 3):51–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis F. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9359-z.

  21. Franche RL, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hensing G, Alexanderson K. The association between sex segregation, working conditions, and sickness absence among employed women. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(e7):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fugl-Meyer AR, Eklund M, Fugl-Meyer KS. Vocational rehabilitation in northern Sweden. III. Aspects of life satisfaction. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23(2):83–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hallin A, et al. Areas of concern, quality of life and life satisfaction in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24(3):255–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schaufeli W, et al. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2002;3(1):71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fryers T. Work, identity and health. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2006;31(2):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D’Amato A, Zijlstra F. Toward a climate for work resumption: the nonmedical determinants of return to work. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(1):67–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lampic C, et al. Life values before versus after a breast cancer diagnosis. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25(2):89–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brouwer S, et al. A prospective study of return to work across health conditions: perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):104–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buck R, et al. Common health problems, yellow flags and functioning in a community setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(2):235–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. MacEachen E, et al. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Floderus B, et al. Self-estimated life situation in patients on long-term sick leave. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(5):291–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vingård E, Alexanderson K, Norlund A. Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 9. Consequences of being on sick leave. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(Suppl 63):207–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ockander M, Timpka T. A female lay perspective on the establishment of long-term sickness absence. Int J Soc Welfare. 2001;10(1):74–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(5):239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A. Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 3. Causes of sickness absence: research approaches and explanatory models. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Torp S, et al. Social support at work and work changes among cancer survivors in Norway. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(Suppl 6):33–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnsson A, et al. Factors associated with return to work after breast cancer treatment. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(1):90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sharp L, Timmons A. Social welfare and legal constraints associated with work among breast and prostate cancer survivors: experiences from Ireland. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(4):382–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A. Risk factors for sick leave—general studies. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(Suppl 63):49–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Balak F, et al. Return to work after early-stage breast cancer: a cohort study into the effects of treatment and cancer-related symptoms. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(3):267–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):345–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hassett MJ, O’Malley AJ, Keating NL. Factors influencing changes in employment among women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(12):2775–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hansson T, Jensen I. Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 6. Sickness absence due to back and neck disorders. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:109–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Johnsson A, et al. Work status and life changes in the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. Work. 2011;38(4):337–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lindbohm ML, et al. Cancer as the cause of changes in work situation (a NOCWO study). Psychooncology. 2011;20(8):805–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tiedtke C, et al. Breast cancer treatment and work disability: patient perspectives. The Breast. 2011;20(6):534–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Stewart DE, et al. Long-term breast cancer survivors: confidentiality, disclosure, effects on work and insurance. Psychooncology. 2001;10(3):259–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Braaten T, et al. Explaining the socioeconomic variation in cancer risk in the Norwegian women and cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14(11):2591–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Danø H, et al. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(2):218–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Heck KE, Pamuk ER. Explaining the relation between education and postmenopausal breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(4):366–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Menvielle G, et al. The contribution of risk factors to the higher incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women with higher levels of education in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(1):26–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Employment and unemployment (Labour Force Survey). 2011. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 21 Jun 2011.

  55. Petersson L-M, et al. Work situation and sickness absence in the initial period after breast cancer surgery. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):282–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Voss M, et al. Comparisons of self-reported and register data on sickness absence among public employees in Sweden. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(1):61–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Hensing G. Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 4. Methodological aspects in sickness-absence research. Scand J Pub Health. 2004;32(Suppl 63):44–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Health Care Science Post-Graduate School at Karolinska Institutet, and the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (2006-0920, and 2009-1758).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena-Marie Petersson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petersson, LM., Nilsson, M.I., Alexanderson, K. et al. How Do Women Value Work Shortly After Breast Cancer Surgery and Are Their Valuations Associated With Being on Sick Leave?. J Occup Rehabil 23, 391–399 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9402-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9402-0

Keywords

Navigation