Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bearing the Brunt: Co-workers’ Experiences of Work Reintegration Processes

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Work disability research has found co-worker support to be a significant but under-recognised aspect of work reintegration (WR) processes. Although co-workers work alongside returning workers, their practical contribution to WR success or failure is often invisible to others. This study aimed to gain further insight into the role and contribution of co-workers in WR interventions. Method An exploratory qualitative pilot study was conducted in Toronto, Canada in 2011. Three focus groups were conducted with 13 co-workers, recruited for their direct experience of ‘working alongside’ a returning worker. An iterative data gathering and analysis process occurred. Themes were generated from categories in open-ended interview questions and new issues arising from the data. Findings The findings detail co-workers’ practical experiences of WR processes and their reflections on social and work conditions that impacted their participation. Co-workers’ capacity to support returning workers was related to the quality of the WR arrangements, the relationship with the returning worker, work culture, and the duration of the required support. Workplace privacy and confidentiality requirements were identified as a key challenge for co-worker participation. The effects on co-workers of WR processes ranged from the opportunity to learn new skills to disillusionment and withdrawal from the workplace. In worst case scenarios, ‘ripple effects’ including emotional distress, physical injury and termination of co-workers’ employment had occurred. Conclusion Co-workers are not a neutral party in WR procedures. Formalizing the co-worker role to include communication, consideration and recognition might improve co-workers’ WR experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthyesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD publishing; 2010.

  2. Anema J, Prinz C, Prins R. Sickness and disability policy interventions. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, Costa-Black K, Feuerstein M, MacEachen E, Pransky G, editors. Handbook of work disability, prevention and management. Springer; forthcoming.

  3. WorkCover ACT. What is injury management and rehabilitation? [http://www.worksafety.act.gov.au/page/view/1455]. Accessed 12 March 2012.

  4. New York State Workers Compenstaion Board. Return to Work Handbook. [http://www.wcb.ny.gov/content/main/ReturnToWork/RTW_Handbook.pdf]. Accessed 12 March 2011.

  5. WorkCover NSW. Injury Management [http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/injuriesclaims/injurymanagement/Pages/default.aspx]. Accessed 12 March 2012.

  6. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Ontatio. Return to Work. [http://www.wsib.on.ca/en/community/WSIB/230/ArticleDetail/24338?vgnextoid=7466e35c819d7210VgnVCM100000449c710aRCRD&vgnextchannel=91d20b368d5dd110VgnVCM1000000e18120aRCRD]. Accessed 12 March 2012.

  7. Kuoppala J, Lamminp A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):796–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Institute for Work & Health (IWH) Workplace-Based RTW Intervention literature review research team. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sager L, James C. Injured workers’ perspectives of their rehabilitation process under the New South Wales workers compensation system. Aust Occup Ther J. 2005;52(2):127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):311–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adams JH, Williams ACdC. What affects return to work for graduates of a pain management program with chronic upper limb pain? J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(2):91–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. WorkCover WA. Injury management: a guide for employers. Shenton Park: Author; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. WorkCover Tasmania. Injury Management: Making it Work, p. 14. [http://www.workcover.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/163686/Making_it_Work.pdf]. Accessed 12 March 2012.

  14. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Ontatio. The facts about injured worker stigma. [http://www.wsib.on.ca/en/community/WSIB/ArticleDetail?vgnextoid=92b75779bdc6e210VgnVCM100000469c710aRCRD]. Accessed 12 March 2012.

  15. Tjulin Å, Maceachen E, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. The social interaction of return to work explored from co-workers experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21–22):1979–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tjulin Å, Maceachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring the meaning of early contact in return-to-work from workplace actors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(2):137–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Glozier N, Hough C, Henderson M, Holland-Elliott K. Attitudes of nursing staff towards co-workers returning from psychiatric and physical illnesses. Int J Soc Psychiatr. 2006;52(6):525–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2101–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. WorkCover NSW. Guidelines for workplace return to work programs. Gosford: WorkCover Publications; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat J-P, Nordin M, Avouac B, Blotman F, Charlot J, Dreiser RL, Legrand E, Rozenberg S, et al. The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain: Report of the International Paris Task Force on back pain. Spine. 2000; 25 (4S) Supplement:1S–33S.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hagen EM, Eriksen HR, Holger U. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain? Spine. 2000;25(15):1973–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krause N, Dasinger K, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 1998;8(2):113–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Ontatio. Return to work plans [http://www.wsib.on.ca/en/community/WSIB/ArticleDetail?vgnextoid=31f84c23529d7210VgnVCM100000449c710aRCRD] Accessed 12 March 2012.

  24. California Department of Industrial Relations. Division of Workers’ Compensation - Employer Information. [http://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/Employer.htm] Accessed 12 March 2012.

  25. Burton AK, Kendall NAS, Pearce BG, Birrell LN, Bainbridge LC. Management of upper limb disorders and the biopsychosocial model. Occup Med. 2009;59:44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

  27. MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Lippel K, Neilson C, Franche R, Pugliese D. The ‘ability’ paradigm in vocational rehabilitation: challenges in an Ontario injured worker retraining program. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(1):105–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. The Australian Institute for Social Research. The role of the workplace in return to work - an evidence base for informing policy and approaches. Discussion Paper. Adelaide; 2008. [http://www.workcover.com/custom/files/Research%20project%20-%20Discussion%20paper%20on%20return%20to%20work%20-%20April%202008.pdf] Accessed 12 March 2012.

  29. Foreman P, Murphy G, Swerissen H. Barriers and facilitators to return to work: a literature review. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Primary Care, La Trobe University; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tjulin A, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;20(3):311–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chiaburu DS, Harrison DA. Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. J Appl Psychol. 2008; 93(5):1082–03.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schneider B. The people make the place. Pers Psychol. 1987;40(3):437–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):227–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Ariëns GAM, van Mechelen W, Bouter LM. High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:323–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, Meloche W. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004;107(1–2):77–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Post M, Krol B, Groothoff JW. Work-related determinants of return to work of employees on long-term sickness absence. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9):481–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Andersen L, Kines P, Hasle P. Owner attitudes and self reported behavior towards modified work after occupational injury absence in small enterprises: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):107–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dekkers S, nchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. A qualitative study of perpetuating factors for long-term sick leave and promoting factors for return to work: chronic work disabled patients in their own words. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(6):544–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dunn EC, Wewiorski NJ, Rogers ES. A qualitative investigation of individual and contextual factors associated with vocational recovery among people with serious mental illness. Am J Orthopsychiat. 2010;80(2):185–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Franche R-L, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabi.l 2005; 15(4):525–42.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Haugli L, Maeland S, Magnussen L. What facilitates return to work? Patients experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):573–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? a qualitative study from employers’ perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):169–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lysaght RM, Larmour-Trode S. An exploration of social support as a factor in the return-to-work process. Work. 2008;30(3):255–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Macaden AS, Chandler BJ, Chandler C, Berry A. Sustaining employment after vocational rehabilitation in acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(14):1140–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Young AE. Return to work following disabling occupational injury—facilitators of employment continuation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E. Institute for work & health (IWH) workplace-based RTW intervention literature review research team. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Eakin JM, MacEachen E, Clarke J. ‘Playing it smart’ with return to work: small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2003;1(2):19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Paton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Charmaz K. Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: revisiting the foundations. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(7):976–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Regional Extended Family Services (REFS). Mediation & conflict resolution training manual. Tamworth, NSW: REFS; 2002.

  51. Rusch FR, Minch KE. Identification of co-worker involvement in supported employment: a review and analysis. Res Dev Disabil. 1988;9(3):247–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gervey R, Bedell JR. Supported employment in vocational rehabilitation. In: Bedell JR, editor. Psychological assessment and treatment of persons with severe mental disorders. Washington: Taylor & Francis; 1994. p. 151–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Work Disability Prevention Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Strategic Training Program Grant (FRN: 53909). We thank the Institute for Work & Health for hosting the working visit that supported this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Discipline of Psychology, School of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia

    Debra A. Dunstan

  2. Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Ellen MacEachen

  3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Ellen MacEachen

Authors
  1. Debra A. Dunstan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ellen MacEachen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra A. Dunstan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunstan, D.A., MacEachen, E. Bearing the Brunt: Co-workers’ Experiences of Work Reintegration Processes. J Occup Rehabil 23, 44–54 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9380-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9380-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation