Skip to main content
Log in

A Conceptual Definition of Vocational Rehabilitation Based on the ICF: Building a Shared Global Model

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is a conceptual framework and classification system by the World Health Organization (WHO) to understand functioning. The objective of this discussion paper is to offer a conceptual definition for vocational rehabilitation (VR) based on the ICF. Method We presented the ICF as a model for application in VR and the rationale for the integration of the ICF. We also briefly reviewed other work disability models. Results Five essential elements of foci were found towards a conceptual definition of VR: an engagement or re-engagement to work, along a work continuum, involved health conditions or events leading to work disability, patient-centered and evidence-based, and is multi-professional or multidisciplinary. Conclusions VR refers to a multi-professional approach that is provided to individuals of working age with health-related impairments, limitations, or restrictions with work functioning and whose primary aim is to optimize work participation. We propose that the ICF and VR interface be explored further using empirical and qualitative works and encouraging stakeholders’ participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Labour Organization. About the ILO. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/global/About_the_ILO/lang--en/index.htm. 2010.

  2. World Health Organization. Workers’ health: global plan of action. 60th World Assembly. WHA60.26. 2007.

  3. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland; 2001.

  4. Gobelet C, Franchignoni F. Vocational rehabilitation. Paris: Springer; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ellenbogen PS, Meade MA, Jackson MN, Barrett K. The impact of spinal cord injury on the employment of family caregivers. J Vocat Rehabil. 2006;25(1):35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boden LI. Running on empty: families, time, and workplace injuries. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(11):1894–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams RM, Westmorland M. Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work. 2002;19(1):87–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tate DG. Workers’ disability and return to work. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;71(2):92–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):796–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Straaton KV, Fine PR. Addressing work disability through vocational rehabilitation services. Bull Rheum Dis. 1997;46(3):1–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shrey DE. Worksite disability management model for effective return-to-work planning. Occup Med. 2000;15(4):789–801.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Briand C, Durand MJ, St-Arnaud L, Corbiere M. How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability? J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(2):207–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schultz IZ. Disentangling the disability quagmire in psychological injury: part 1- disability and return to work: theories, methods, and applications. Psychol Inj and Law. 2008;1:94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Escorpizo R, Ekholm J, Gmunder HP, Cieza A, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Developing a core set to describe functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(4):502–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peterson DB. Psychological aspects of functioning, disability, and health. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson DB. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): an introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:105–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Loisel P, Durand P, Abenhaim L, Gosselin L, Simard R, Turcotte J, et al. Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study. Occup Environ Med. 1994;51(9):597–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):233–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, et al. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004;107(1–2):77–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehabil. 1991;1(1):5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ. 2010;340:c1035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, Knol DL, Loisel P, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: graded activity or workplace intervention or both? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(3):291–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steenstra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, van Mechelen W. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):557–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu YW, Chan CC, Lam CS, Li-Tsang CW, Lo-Hui KY, Gatchel RJ. Rehabilitation of injured workers with chronic pain: a stage of change phenomenon. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):727–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li-Tsang WPC, Chan HHK, Lam CS, Lo-Hui KYL, Chan CCH. Psychosocial aspects of injured workers’ returning to work (RTW) in Hong Kong. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;17:279–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Holmes J. Vocational rehabilitation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kielhofner G, Burke JP. A model of human occupation, part 1. Conceptual framework and content. Am J Occup Ther. 1980;34(9):572–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(3):195–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Trexler LE, Trexler LC, Malec JF, Klyce D, Parrott D. Prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation on community participation and vocational outcome following brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(6):440–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bond GR. Supported employment: evidence for an evidence-based practice. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;27(4):345–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pransky G, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Loisel P. Improving return to work research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):453–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stucki G, Cieza A, Melvin J. The International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): a unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):279–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Selander J. Unemployed sick-leavers and vocational rehabilitation - a person-level study based on a national social insurance material; PhD thesis, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Rehabbilitation Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden. 1999.

  37. Marnetoft S-U. The Challenges of Vocational Rehabilitation in Sweden. Kuntoutus Fin J Rehabil. 2009;4:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  38. Verbeek JH. How can doctors help their patients to return to work? PLoS Med. 2006;3(3):e88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parker RM, Szymanski EM, Patterson JB. editors. Rehabilitation counseling: basics and beyond. 4th ed. Austin: Pro-Ed; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sandqvist JL, Henriksson CM. Work functioning: a conceptual framework. Work. 2004;23(2):147–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. MacDonald-Wilson K, Rogers ES, Anthony WA. Unique issues in assessing work function among individuals with psychiatric disabilities. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11(3):217–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Maronner J, Gandolfo C, Gold M, Hoff D. If you think work is bad for people with mental illness, then try poverty, unemployment, and social isolation. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2000;23(2):187–93.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Suzuki Y, Kikuchi E, Watanabe S. Assessment of vocational opportunities and continuing job placement for persons with mental disabilities: factors indicating levels of necessary support. Work. 2008;30(2):185–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Council on Rehabilitation Education. Revised core accreditation standards. Section II CORE accreditation manual. 2010;1–21.

  45. Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Soc Health Illn. 2004;26(3):287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Borell L, Asaba E, Rosenberg L, Schult ML, Townsend E. Exploring experiences of “participation” among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13(2):76–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Whalley-Hammell K. Deviating from the norm: a skeptical interrogation of the classificatory practices of the ICF. Br J Occup Ther. 2004;67(9):408–11.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stubbs J, Deaner G. When considering vocational rehabilitation: describing and comparing the Swedish and American systems and professions. Work. 2005;24(3):239–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Young AE. Return to work following disabling occupational injury - facilitators of employment continuation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):766–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lagerveld SE, Bultmann U, Franche RL, van Dijk FJ, Vlasveld MC, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, et al. Factors associated with work participation and work functioning in depressed workers: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):275–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sanderson K, Nicholson J, Graves N, Tilse E, Oldenburg B. Mental health in the workplace: using the ICF to model the prospective associations between symptoms, activities, participation and environmental factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(17):1289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Heerkens Y, Engels J, Kuiper C, Van der Gulden J, Oostendorp R. The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(17):1060–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kirsh B, Krupa T, Cockburn L, Gewurtz R. A Canadian model of work integration for persons with mental illnesses. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(22):1833–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Debra Homa (Department of Rehabilitation and Counseling, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie WI, USA), Eva Schonstein (Medibank Health Solutions and The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia), Urban Studer (Schweizerische Bundesbahnen SBB, Bern, Switzerland), and Jos Verbeek (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland) for serving as reviewers of the manuscript prior to submission. We also would like to thank the other members of the International Work Rehabilitation Network (i-NetWork) for their active participation during the conference on the ICF Core Set Development for Vocational Rehabilitation: Alex Burdorf (The Netherlands), Tania Buys (South Africa), Jain Holmes (UK), Stefan Koch (Germany), Jan Kool (Switzerland), Dennis Nowak (Germany), Rahel Oertli (Switzerland), Soo-Kyung Park (South Korea), Robin Pickard (UK), Stefan Staubli (Switzerland), and Frank Staudenmann (Switzerland). i-NetWork is an informal network of researchers, practitioners, and advocates whose interest is to advance the field of work rehabilitation. Special thanks to Monika Finger and Miriam Lückenkemper for reviewing the manuscript prior to submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reuben Escorpizo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Escorpizo, R., Reneman, M.F., Ekholm, J. et al. A Conceptual Definition of Vocational Rehabilitation Based on the ICF: Building a Shared Global Model. J Occup Rehabil 21, 126–133 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9292-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9292-6

Keywords

Navigation