Abstract
Background: Despite considerable multidisciplinary research on return to work (RTW), there has been only modest progress in implementation of study results, and little change in overall rates of work disability in developed countries. Methods: Thirty RTW researchers, representing over 20 institutions, assembled to review the current state of the art in RTW research, to identify promising areas for further development, and to provide direction for future investigations. Results and Conclusion: Six major themes were selected as priority areas: early risk prediction; psychosocial, behavioral and cognitive interventions; physical treatments; the challenge of implementing evidence in the workplace context; effective methods to engage multiple stakeholders; and identification of outcomes that are relevant to both RTW stakeholders and different phases of the RTW process. Understanding and preventing delayed RTW will require application of new concepts and study designs, better measures of determinants and outcomes, and more translational research. Greater stakeholder involvement and commitment, and methods to address the unique challenges of each situation are required.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Linton SJ. Early identification and intervention in the prevention of musculoskeletal pain. Am J Ind Med 2002; 41: 433–442.
Gatchel RJ. Musculoskeletal disorders: Primary and secondary interventions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004; 14: 161–170.
Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: A critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12: 277–295.
Waddell G, Aylward M, Sawney P. Back pain, incapacitiy for work and social security benefits: An international literature review and analysis. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2002.
Pransky G, Benjamin K, Hill-Fotouhi C, Fletcher KE, Himmelstein J, Katz JN. Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain: A multidimensional analysis. Spine 2002; 27: 864–870.
Burton WN, Pransky G, Conti DJ, Chen CY, Edington DW. The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med 2004; 46: S38–S45.
Pransky G, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J, Mundt K, Morgan W, Feuerstein M, Koyamatsu K, Hill-Fotouhi C. Work-related upper-extremity disorders: Prospective evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41: 884–892.
Linton SJ, Gross D, Schultz IZ, Main C, Côté P, Pransky G, Johnson W. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: Research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 459–474.
Sullivan MJL, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 475–489.
Staal JB, Rainville J, Fritz J, van Mechelen W. Physical exercise interventions to improve disability and return-to-work in low back pain: Current insights and opportunities for improvement. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 491–505.
Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, Webster B. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 507–524.
Franche R-L, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: Optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 525–542.
Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, Anema JR, van Poppel MNM. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 543–556.
Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 557–568.
Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan TJ, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001; 40: 464–484.
Wyatt M, Underwood MR, Scheel IB, Cassidy JD, Nagel P. Back pain and health policy research: The what, why, how, who, and when. Spine 2004; 29: E468–E475.
Bernacki EJ, Guidera JA, Schaefer JA, Tsai S. A facilitated early return to work program at a large urban medical center. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42: 1172–1177.
Wickizer TM, Franklin GM, Mootz RD, Fulton-Kehoe D, Plaeger-Brockway R, Drylie D, Turner JA, Smith-Weller T. A communitywide intervention to improve outcomes and reduce disability among injured workers in Washington State. Milbank Q 2004; 82: 547–567.
Loisel P, Durand MJ, Diallo B, Vachon B, Charpentier N, Labelle J. From evidence to community practice in work rehabilitation: The Quebec experience. Clin J Pain 2003; 19: 105–113.
Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Systematic review. BMJ 2001; 322: 1511–1516.
Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. 2001 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: Effects of a media campaign on back pain beliefs and its potential influence on management of low back pain in general practice. Spine 2001; 26: 2535–2542.
Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 129–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pransky, G., Gatchel, R., Linton, S.J. et al. Improving Return to Work Research. J Occup Rehabil 15, 453–457 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8027-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8027-y