Abstract
The three studies reported examine judgment about the attempts of footballers (soccer players) to deceptively exaggerate the effect of a tackle. Study one reveals that non-professional participants agree about which players were attempting deception and those that were not; there was also agreement about the tackles in which the intentions were ambiguous. Study two demonstrates that the intentions of tackled players match the judgment of their intentions by observers. Study three provides a taxonomy of behaviors that are associated with deceptive and non deceptive intentions. We conclude that deceptive intentions in this context are to a degree manifest in behavior and are observable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We selected games from the lower leagues and used old recordings to avoid the participants knowing the particular footballers involved. We did not allow participants to watch clips of their ‘own’ team and we did not use important league games or cup semi-final or finals. No participants reported a particular interest in any of the games or players viewed.
References
Abernethy, B. (1990). Expertise, visual search, and information pick-up in squash. Perception, 19, 63–77.
Abernethy, B., Gill, D. P., Parks, S. L., & Packer, S. T. (2001). Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information. Perception, 30, 233–252.
Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 353–367.
Balmer, N. J., Nevill, A. M., & Lane, A. M. (2005). Do judges enhance home advantage in European championship boxing? Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 409–416.
Cook, M. (2004). 101 youth soccer drills. London: A & C Publishers Limited.
Dasser, V., Ulbaek, I., & Premack, D. (1989). The perception of intention. Science, 243, 365–367.
Dawson, P., Dobson, S., Goddard, J., & Wilson, J. (2007). Are football referees really biased and inconsistent? Evidence on the incidence of disciplinary sanction in the English premier league. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170, 231–250.
Dennet, D. (1989). The intentional stance. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Dohmen, T. (2008). Social pressure influences decisions of individuals: Evidence from the behavior of football referees. Economic Inquiry, 46, 411–424.
Farrow, D., & Abernethy, B. (2003). Do expertise and the degree of perception––action coupling affect natural anticipatory performance? Perception, 32, 1127–1139.
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378–382.
Frank, M. G., & Gilovich, T. (1988). The dark side of self and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sport. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 74–85.
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.
Greenlees, I. A., Bradley, A., Holder, T. P., & Thelwell, R. C. (2005). The impact of two forms of opponents’ non-verbal communication on impression formation and outcome expectations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 103–115.
Greenlees, I., Leyland, A., Thelwell, R., & Filby, W. (2008). Soccer penalty takers’ uniform and pre-penalty kick gaze affect the impressions formed of them by opposing goalkeepers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 569–576.
Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., & Leissing, J. (2008). When the referee sees red…. Psychological Science, 19, 769–771.
Jackson, R. C., Warren, S., & Abernethy, B. (2006). Anticipation and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123, 355–371.
Jones, M. V., Paul, G. G., & Erskine, J. (2002). The impact of a team’s aggressive reputation on the decisions of association football referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 991–1000.
Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265–288.
Matsumoto, D., Konno, J., Hata, S., & Takeuchi, M. (2007). Uniform color and sport competition outcomes. Research Journal of Budo, 39, 1–8.
Michotte, A. (1946/1963). The perception of causality. London: Methuen.
Műller, S., Abernethy, B., & Farrow, D. (2006). How do world-class cricket batsmen anticipate a bowler’s intention? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2162–2186.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.
Plessner, H., & Haar, T. (2006). Sports performance judgments from a social cognitive perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 555–575.
Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The Language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443–458.
Schlottman, A., & Surian, L. (1999). Do 9-month-olds perceive causation at a distance? Perception, 28, 1105–1113.
Schneider, D. J. (2005). The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Publications.
Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 299–309.
Tye, C. M., Amato, S. L., Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., & Peters, D. (1999). The willingness of children to lie and the assessment of credibility in an ecologically relevant laboratory setting. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 92–109.
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Wilkerson, W. S. (1999). From bodily motions to bodily intentions: The perception of bodily activity. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 61–77.
Young, M. E., Beckmann, J. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (2006). Pigeons’ discrimination of Michotte’s launching effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 223–237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morris, P.H., Lewis, D. Tackling Diving: The Perception of Deceptive Intentions in Association Football (Soccer). J Nonverbal Behav 34, 1–13 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0075-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0075-0