Abstract
This study examined the temporal within-person associations between subjective well-being (life satisfaction, positive affect, low negative affect) and the Big Five personality traits (openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism). A representative American sample was used, collected over a period of approximately two decades and at 3 time points. To separate between-person and within-person levels, the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model was used. Results at the within-person level showed that higher-than-usual levels of subjective well-being were associated with higher-than-usual levels of extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness after about a decade. Higher-than-usual levels of openness were associated with higher-than-usual future levels of subjective well-being. Whereas neuroticism was the strongest correlate of subjective well-being at the between-person level, it had no association with subjective well-being at the within-person level. The results illustrate the importance of distinguishing within and between levels when examining associations between personality traits and well-being.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data and study materials are publicly available. More information can be found at http://midus.wisc.edu/data/index.php.
References
Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226
Anusic, I., & Schimmack, U. (2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000066
Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2008). Auxiliary variables predicting missing data. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/AuxM2.pdf
Bleidorn, W., Schwaba, T., Zheng, A., Hopwood, C. J., Sosa, S. S., Roberts, B. W., & Briley, D. A. (2022). Personality stability and change: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 148(7–8), 588–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000365
Brim, O. G., Ryff, C. D., & Kessler, R. C. (2004). The MIDUS National survey: An overview. In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we?: A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 1–34). The University of Chicago Press.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004
Diener, E. & Lucas, R. E. (2023). Personality traits. In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: DEF publishers. Retrieved from http://noba.to/96u8ecgw
Diener, E. (1998). Subjective well-being and personality. In D. F. Barone, M. Hersen, & V. B. Van Hasselt (Eds.), Advanced personality (pp. 311–334). Springer.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6
Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000041
Fetvadjiev, V. H., & He, J. (2019). The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem: A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000212
Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 439–492). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the royal society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
Fredrickson, B. L. (2008). Promoting positive affect. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 449–468). Guilford Press.
Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 1025–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x
Geiser, C. (2020). Longitudinal structural equation modeling with Mplus: A latent state-trait perspective. Guilford publications.
Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. G. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
Hudson, N. W., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2017). Day-to-day affect is surprisingly stable: A 2-year longitudinal study of well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662129
Joshanloo, M. (2017). Factor structure and criterion validity of original and short versions of the negative and positive affect scale (NAPAS). Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.060
Joshanloo, M. (2019). Investigating the relationships between subjective well-being and psychological well-being over two decades. Emotion, 19(1), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000414
Joshanloo, M. (2021). There is no temporal relationship between hedonic values and life satisfaction: A longitudinal study spanning 13 years. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104125
Joshanloo, M. (2022a). Longitudinal relationships between personality traits and social well-being: A two-decade study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(6), 2969–2983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00534-1
Joshanloo, M. (2022b). Reciprocal relationships between personality traits and psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 114(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12596
Joshanloo, M. (2023). How stable are life domain evaluations over time? A 20-year study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(2), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00618-6
Kandler, C., Kornadt, A. E., Hagemeyer, B., & Neyer, F. J. (2015). Patterns and sources of personality development in old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000028
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
Lachman, M. E. (2005). Addendum for MIDI Personality Scales: MIDUS II version. Retrieved from https://www.brandeis.edu/departments/psych/lachman/pdfs/revised-midi-scales.pdf
Lucas, R. E. (2018). Exploring the associations between personality and subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. DOI:nobascholar.com
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
Magee, C. A., Miller, L. M., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2013). Personality trait change and life satisfaction in adults: The roles of age and hedonic balance. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(6), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.05.022
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
Metler, S. J., & Busseri, M. A. (2015). Further evaluation of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Evidence from longitudinal and experimental studies. Journal of Personality, 85(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12233
Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349.
Newsom, J. T. (2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. Routledge.
Okbay, A., Baselmans, B. M. L., De Neve, J.-E., Turley, P., Nivard, M. G., Fontana, M. A., Meddens, S. F. W., Linnér, R. K., Rietveld, C. A., Derringer, J., Gratten, J., Lee, J. J., Liu, J. Z., de Vlaming, R., Ahluwalia, T. S., Buchwald, J., Cavadino, A., Frazier-Wood, A. C., Furlotte, N. A., & Garfield, V. (2016). Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses. Nature Genetics, 48(6), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3552
Orth, U., Meier, L. L., Bühler, J. L., Dapp, L. C., Krauss, S., Messerli, D., & Robins, R. W. (2022). Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000499
Pelt, D. H. M., de Vries, L. P., & Bartels, M. (2022). Unraveling the relation between personality and well-being in a genetically informative design. European Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070221134878
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
Røysamb, E., & Nes, R. B. (2018). The genetics of wellbeing. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. DOI:nobascholar.com
Ryff, C. D., & Krueger, R. F. (2018). Approaching human health as an integrative challenge: Introduction and overview. In C. D. Ryff & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of integrative health science. Oxford University Press.
Schunk, F., & Trommsdorff, G. (2022). Longitudinal associations of neuroticism with life satisfaction and social adaptation in a nationally representative adult sample. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12783
Soto, C. J. (2015). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the big five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12081
Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2012). Examining mechanisms of personality maturation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612448197
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138
Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13(5), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5%3c389::AID-PER361%3e3.0.CO;2-A
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-12-00156.1
Sun, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Smillie, L. D. (2018). Unique associations between big five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12301
Womick, J., & King, L. A. (2020). Personality and well-being. In B. J. Carducci & C. Nave (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of personality and individual differences: Clinical, applied, and cross-cultural research (pp. 371–376). Wiley.
Funding
This research received no grant from any funding agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Ethical Approval
MIDUS data collection is reviewed and approved by the Education and Social/Behavioral Sciences and the Health Sciences IRBs at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. For more information see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280664.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Joshanloo, M. Within-Person Associations Between Subjective Well-Being and Big Five Personality Traits. J Happiness Stud 24, 2111–2126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00673-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00673-z