Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multitasking and Feeling Good? Autonomy of Additional Activities Predicts Affect

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a consensus that multitasking is becoming more frequent in students’ everyday lives. However, few studies investigated the relationship of multitasking and affect, and those that did found contradictory results. The aim of the current study was to disentangle these results by adopting a self-determination theory perspective. In accordance with self-determination theory, we predicted that multitasking is associated with higher positive and lower negative affect than mono-tasking when the additional activity is motivated autonomously, i.e. when the additional activity is done voluntarily. On the other hand, we hypothesised that multitasking is associated with higher negative and lower positive affect than mono-tasking when the additional activity is motivated because of controlled reasons. In an experience sampling study, 51 students completed 1341 questionnaires over the course of 1 week. For each prompt, students specified their current affect, what they were currently doing as a main activity, whether they were engaged in any additional activity (i.e., multitasking), and how autonomously they were motivated to carry out each of their activities. Results showed that students multitasked 41% of the time. In line with self-determination theory, multitasking with an autonomous additional activity in comparison to mono-tasking was associated with higher positive affect, whereas multitasking with a controlled additional activity in comparison to mono-tasking was associated with higher negative affect. To our knowledge, the current study is the first to demonstrate that the relationship of multitasking and affect depends on the level of autonomy of the additional activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, M. W., Alzahabi, R., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). Media multitasking is associated with symptoms of depression and social anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54(4), 927–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunstein, J. C. (1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1061–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences (Vol. 1). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’Alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P. L., & Conklin, E. M. (2014). What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers & Education, 75, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. G., Bickham, D., Ross, C. S., & Rich, M. (2015). Multitasking with television among adolescents. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.998228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, S., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 1032–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, J. P., Green, P. J., Martin, R., & Suls, J. (1997). Differential roles of neuroticism, extraversion, and event desirability for mood in daily life: An integrative model of top-down and bottom-up influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (1st ed., pp. 416–437). Newbury Park: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. R., Hall, C. R., Wilson, P. M., & Jenny, O. (2010). Exercise motivation: a cross-sectional analysis examining its relationships with frequency, intensity, and duration of exercise. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Trull, T. J. (2009). Ambulatory assessment. European Psychologist, 14(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll (3. ed). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://www.uk.sagepub.com/field3e/main.htm.

  • Floro, M. S., & Miles, M. (2003). Time use and overlapping activities: Evidence from Australia (Electronic Resource). SPRC discussion papers, Vol. 112. Sydney, NSW: SPRC. Retrieved from http://www.sprc.unsw.edu.au/dp/DP113file.pdf.

  • Galluch, P., Long, C., Bratton, T., Gee, M., & Groeber, M. (2009). Losing the battle: Student and instructor perspectives on attention loss in the classroom. In Proceedings of the southern association for information systems conference, Charleston, SC, March 12th–14th, 2009 45, pp. 45–50.

  • Garhammer, M. (2002). Pace of life and enjoyment of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(3), 217–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020676100938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiser, C. (2011). Data analysis using Mplus—A users‘introductio Datenanalyse mit Mplus—Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung (2., durchges. Aufl). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

  • German Psychology Association and the German Professional Association Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie und der Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen e.V. (2004). [Ethical Standards] Ethische Richtlinien. Retrieved from http://www.hw.uni-wuerzburg.de/fileadmin/06020000/download/Ethische_Richtlinien_der_DGPs_und_des_BDP.pdf.

  • Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., Nett, U. E., Pekrun, R., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2014). Types of boredom: An experience sampling approach. Motivation and Emotion, 38(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9385-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science, 333(6051), 1878–1881. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2007). Regulation of Boredom in the Classroom Regulation von Langeweile im Unterricht. Was Schulerinnen und Schuler bei der „Windstille der Seele“(nicht) tun. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 35(4), 312–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graef, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gianinno, S. M. (1983). Measuring intrinsic motivation in everyday life. Leisure Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614368300390121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, A., Grunschel, C., Bruhn, D., & Fries, S. (2015). Torn between want and should: An experience-sampling study on motivational conflict, well-being, self-control, and mindfulness. Motivation and Emotion, 39(4), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9476-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Wolff, E. (2014). Not everything at once! Nicht alles gleichzeitig! Focus Magazin. Retrieved from http://www.focus.de/kultur/medien/kultur-nicht-alles-gleichzeitig_id_3709443.html.

  • Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

  • Ironmonger, D. S. (2003). There are only 24 hurs in a day! Solving the problematic of simultaneous time. In The 25th IATUR conference on time use research, Brüssels, Belgium.

  • Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanning, M., Ebner-Priemer, U., & Brand, R. (2012). Autonomous regulation mode moderates the effect of actual physical activity on affective states: An ambulant assessment approach to the role of self-determination. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34(2), 260–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. In P. Schmuck & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving (pp. 116–131). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, S. (2008). Internet use and time use—The importance of multitasking. Time & Society, 17(2–3), 283–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X08093426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchberg, D. M., Roe, R. A., & van Eerde, W. (2015). Polychronicity and multitasking: A diary study at work. Human Performance, 28(2), 112–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraushaar, J., & Novak, D. (2010). Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznekoff, J., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62(3), 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. M., Wobbrock, J. O., Kaszniak, A. W., & Ostergren, M. (2012). The effects of mindfulness meditation training on multitasking in a high-stress information environment. Graphics Interface.

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marco, C. A., & Suls, J. (1993). Daily stress and the trajectory of mood: spillover, response assimilation, contrast, and chronic negative affectivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. K., & Buschman, T. J. (2015). Working memory capacity: Limits on the bandwidth of cognition. DAEDALUS, 144(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables; User’s Guide Version 7 (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. K., Della Porta, M. D., Jacobs Bao, K., Lee, H. C., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). ‘It’s up to you’: Experimentally manipulated autonomy support for prosocial behavior improves well-being in two cultures over six weeks. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.983959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2011). Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offer, S., & Schneider, B. (2011). Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns: Multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 809–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411425170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1990). Need satisfaction and involvement in personal projects: Toward an integrative model of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. C. (2017). A naturalistic investigation of media multitasking while studying and the effects on exam performance. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pychyl, T. A., Lee, J. M., Thibodeau, R., & Blunt, A. (2001). Five days of emotion: An experience sampling study of undergraduate student procrastination. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(5), 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, L., Aufenanger, S., Beutel, M. E., Dreier, M., Quiring, O., Stark, B., et al. (2017). Digital stress over the life span: the effects of communication load and internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a german probability sample. Media Psychology, 20, 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, D., Zhou, H., & Fu, X. (2009). A deeper look at gender difference in multitasking: Gender-specific mechanism of cognitive control. In H. Wang (Ed.), Fifth international conference on natural computation, 2009: ICNC ‘09; Tianjin, China, 14–16 Aug 2009; held jointly with the 6th international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD 2009) (pp. 13–17). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNC.2009.542.

  • Riediger, M., & Freund, A. M. (2008). Me against myself: Motivational conflicts and emotional development in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 479–494. Retrieved from http://library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/ft/mr/MR_Me_Against_2008.pdf.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, London: Guilford Press. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/subhh/detail.action?docID=4773318.

  • Ryan, R. M., Rigby, S., & King, K. (1993). Two types of religious internalization and their relations to religious orientations and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2011). The multitasking mind. Retrieved from http://gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=590183.

  • Salvucci, D. D., Taatgen, N. A., & Borst, J. P. (2009). Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. In CHI (Ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1819–1828). New York: ACM Press.

  • Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J. M. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck, P., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic goals: Their structure and relationship to well-being in German and U.S. college students. Social indicators research : An international and interdisciplinary journal for quality-of-life measurement, 50(2), 225–241. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007084005278.

  • Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1270–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, S.-I. (2013). A null relationship between media multitasking and well-being. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snir, R., & Zohar, D. (2008). Workaholism as discretionary time investment at work: An experience-sampling study. Applied Psychology—An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 57(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00270.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of theories of social psychology (1st ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, C. (2006). genM: The multitasking generation. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1174696-9,00.html.

  • Wang, H. (Ed.) 2009. Fifth international conference on natural computation, 2009: ICNC ‘09; Tianjin, China, 14–16 Aug. 2009; held jointly with the 6th international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD 2009). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

  • Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The ‘myth’ of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N., & Hodgins, H. S. (2009). The moderating role of autonomy and control on the benefits of written emotion expression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208328165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., Wang, Z., & David, P. (2016). Media multitasking and well-being of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(1), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was founded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), Grant Number: 01PB14003A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany

    Olga Bachmann, Carola Grunschel & Stefan Fries

Authors
  1. Olga Bachmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carola Grunschel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Fries
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Bachmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bachmann, O., Grunschel, C. & Fries, S. Multitasking and Feeling Good? Autonomy of Additional Activities Predicts Affect. J Happiness Stud 20, 899–918 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9973-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9973-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation