Abstract
This paper examines cross-country happiness interdependencies. The sample under study includes 116 countries of diverse characteristics using averaged data for the year 2006. We divide the entire data into six groups of countries, viz., Income domain (developed and developing); Income inequality (equal and unequal); Level of political history (socialist and non-socialist). A spatial econometric technique is used to estimate the spillover effects of one country’s well-being on the well-being of the neighboring countries. Both spatial and non-spatial results indicate that corruption, health and national income serve as the best indicators of happiness for developed and equal countries, whereas unemployment affects the developing, non-socialist and unequal nations. Corruption appears to be the most significant factor, implying that a better quality government makes everybody happy. Furthermore, we find significant happiness spillovers among the above specified groups, thus indicating the importance of group clustering in the studies of happiness. The result suggests that the more homogenous the group is, the higher will be the spillover among them. We observe positive spillover for developed countries and negative spillover for socialist and equal countries. Ignoring such spatial spillover effect may lead to misunderstanding of various policy implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The terms well-being, life satisfaction and happiness are often used interchangeably, as empirically they seem to measure a very similar concept (Hayo 2004).
For an introduction to the spatial econometric methods see for instance Anselin (1988).
Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Gowdy (2007) shows that regional dummies are important for determining the relationship between environmental concerns and wellbeing.
When Comparing between developed and developing countries, it is true that income and happiness are positively related and that the marginal utility falls with higher income. Higher income clearly raises happiness in developing countries, while the effect is only small, if it exists at all, in rich countries (Frey and Stutzer 2002, p. 90).
A broad introduction to the relevance of happiness research for economics can be found in Frey and Stutzer (2002).
World database of happiness is a comprehensive database that allows a comparison of the countries covering all continents with a wide range of economic, socio-demographic and institutional characteristics.
Only countries in which all explanatory variables used in the regression analyses were available are considered.
World bank world development indicators; downloadable from http://www.worldbank.org/data/wdi/worldview.html;
Helliwell (2003) employed panel data from 49 countries to show the existence of substantial well-being benefits from improved quality of governance (a composite measure that includes accountability, effectiveness and stability of government, the rule of law and control of corruption.
One could imagine that people live long in a country but not happily, for instance because blind use of medical technology stretches out life and makes it too long. Likewise, one could imagine that people live happy in a country but not long, possibly as a result of too much indulgence.
Comparison of OLS and ordinary logit regressions in fact finds differences to be negligible (Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Frijters 2004).
The spatial lag model can also be estimated by generalized method-of-moments (GMM) (Anselin 2006) or by the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method (LeSage and Pace 2009, Ch. 5). Software packages to estimate spatial econometric models are Stata, Spacestat, Geoda (freely downloadable) and Matlab (see URL: www.spatial-econometrics.com).
Income inequality signals future mobility and increases present satisfaction. This implies a positive relation between income inequality and life satisfaction (the Hirschman/Rothschild mechanism). The second mechanism is that a rise in income inequality leads to an increase in relative deprivation and a decrease in life satisfaction (the Runciman/Yitzhaki mechanism).
Both competing for greater well-being, however wellbeing of one is achieved at the cost of the others.
If social mobility is perceived as high, (potential) welfare recipients might even fear the costs of redistribution more than they value its benefits.
The spatial multiplier captures the magnitude and distribution of the spatial spillovers in the system. For a more detailed discussion see (e.g. Anselin 2003).
References
Alesina, A., DiTella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Anselin, L. (2003). Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 153–166.
Anselin, L. (2006), Spatial econometrics,” In T.C. Mills and K. Patterson (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics: Econometric Theory. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, Vol. 1, pp. 901–969.
Bjornskov, C. (2008). Healthy and happy in Europe? On the association between happiness and life expectancy over time. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1750–1759.
Blanchflower D.G. (2008). International evidence on well-being. IZA Discussion Paper No.3354.
Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New York, USA: New Brunswick.
Clark, A., Fabrice, E., Fabien, V., Claudia, S., & Karine, S. (2005). Heterogeneity in reported well-being: Evidence from twelve European Countries. Economic Journal, 115(502), 118–132.
Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.
Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53–72.
Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. J. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25–46.
Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91(1), 335–341.
Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomic of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 809–827.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.
Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of All? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–48.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Gowdy, J. M. (2007). Environmental degradation and happiness. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 509–516.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy, and institution. Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.
Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality, 4, 107–122.
Griffith, D. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: Gaining understanding through theory and scientific visualization. Berlin: Springer.
Hayo, B. (2004). Happiness in Eastern Europe. Mimeo, Philipps University Marburg, Number 12/2004.
Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modeling, 20, 331–360.
Helliwell, J., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619.
Hirschman, A. O., & Michael, R. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development; with a mathematical appendix. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566.
Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285.
Kenny, C. (2005). Does development make you happy? Subjective well-being and economic growth in developing countries. Social Indicators Research, 73, 199–219.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness. Mimeo: London School of Economics.
Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and public policy: A challenge to the profession. Economic Journal, 116(510), C24–C33.
Leigh, A., & Wolfers, J. (2006). Happiness and the human development index: Australia is not a paradox. Australian Economic Review, 39(2), 176–184.
LeSage, J. P., & Pace, K. R. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.
Ott, J. C. (2005). Level and equality of happiness in nations: Does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness? Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(4), 397–420.
Ovaska, T., & Ryo, T. (2006). Economic policy and the level of self-perceived well-being: An international comparison. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 308–325.
Steimetz, S. S. C. (2010). Spatial multipliers in hedonic analysis: a comment on Spatial hedonic models of airport noise, proximity, and housing prices. Journal of Regional Science, 50, 995–998.
Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1–34.
Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicator Research, 37, 1–46.
Veenhoven, R. (2000). Well-being in the welfare state: Level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2, 91–125.
Veenhoven, R. (2008a). World database of happiness, item bank. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Assessed March (2009) http://www.worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl.
Veenhoven, R. (2008b). World database of happiness, distributional findings in nations. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Assessed March 2009 http://www.worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the anonymous referees insightful comments and suggestions. We also thank the financial support for this project from Jubilee Foundation for Economic Ethics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, CH.A., Lahiri, S. & Hsu, CP. Happiness and Regional Segmentation: Does Space Matter?. J Happiness Stud 15, 57–83 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9416-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9416-0